Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
5925

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 June 2025.#Vyacheslav Aleksandrovich Boguslayev v Council of the European Union.#Common Foreign and Security Policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions compromising or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Error of assessment – Non-contractual liability – Damage to reputation and the presumption of innocence – Non-material damage – Reality of the damage.#Case T-297/24.

cjeu_case ·
5926

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 June 2025.#Vyacheslav Aleksandrovich Boguslayev v Council of the European Union.#Common Foreign and Security Policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions compromising or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Error of assessment – Non-contractual liability – Damage to reputation and the presumption of innocence – Non-material damage – Reality of the damage.#Case T-297/24.

cjeu_case ·
5931

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 June 2025.#Sven Benschop v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark ALWAYS RUN 4PRESIDENT – Earlier EU figurative mark PRESIDENT’s – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier mark acquired through use.#Case T-76/24.

cjeu_case ·
5932

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 June 2025.#Sven Benschop v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark ALWAYS RUN 4PRESIDENT – Earlier EU figurative mark PRESIDENT’s – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier mark acquired through use.#Case T-76/24.

cjeu_case ·
5935

Case T-297/24: Judgment of the General Court of 4 June 2025 – Boguslayev v Council (Common Foreign and Security Policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions compromising or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Error of assessment – Non-contractual liability – Damage to reputation and the presumption of innocence – Non-material damage – Reality of the damage)

cjeu_case ·
5938

Case T-76/24: Judgment of the General Court of 4 June 2025 – Benschop v EUIPO – Seven Bell Group (ALWAYS RUN 4PRESIDENT) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark ALWAYS RUN 4PRESIDENT – Earlier EU figurative mark PRESIDENT’s – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier mark acquired through use)

cjeu_case ·
5939

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 June 2025.#Balneari Rimini v Comune di Rimini.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to provide reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court – Manifest inadmissibility in part – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Directive 2006/123/EC – Directive 2014/23/EU – Scope – Concessions of State-owned coastal land used for tourism and recreational purposes – Action for damages – No automatic extension.#Case C-464/24.

cjeu_case ·
5940

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 June 2025.#Balneari Rimini v Comune di Rimini.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di Rimini.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to provide reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court – Manifest inadmissibility in part – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Directive 2006/123/EC – Directive 2014/23/EU – Scope – Concessions of State-owned coastal land used for tourism and recreational purposes – Action for damages – No automatic extension.#Case C-464/24.

cjeu_case ·