Legal documents catalogue (cjeu_case)

104,314 documents
3669

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 23 October 2025.#B.F. (1) and B.F. (2) v Z. sp. z o.o.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive (EU) 2015/2302 – Package travel and linked travel arrangements – Performance of the package – Lack of conformity of the services provided – Article 14(1) – Right to an appropriate price reduction – Article 14(2) – Right to receive appropriate compensation for damages – Article 14(3)(b) – Circumstances precluding the traveller’s entitlement to compensation – Lack of conformity of the services provided that is attributable to a third party unconnected with the provision of the travel services included in the package travel contract and is unforeseeable or unavoidable – Demonstration of fault – Article 4 – Level of harmonisation – Full refund despite partial supply of services – Article 1 – High level of consumer protection – Article 25 – Penalties – Article 3(12) – Concept of ‘unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances’ – Act of public authority.#Case C-469/24.

cjeu_case ·
3670

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 23 October 2025.#B.F. (1) and B.F. (2) v Z. sp. z o.o.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Rzeszowie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive (EU) 2015/2302 – Package travel and linked travel arrangements – Performance of the package – Lack of conformity of the services provided – Article 14(1) – Right to an appropriate price reduction – Article 14(2) – Right to receive appropriate compensation for damages – Article 14(3)(b) – Circumstances precluding the traveller’s entitlement to compensation – Lack of conformity of the services provided that is attributable to a third party unconnected with the provision of the travel services included in the package travel contract and is unforeseeable or unavoidable – Demonstration of fault – Article 4 – Level of harmonisation – Full refund despite partial supply of services – Article 1 – High level of consumer protection – Article 25 – Penalties – Article 3(12) – Concept of ‘unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances’ – Act of public authority.#Case C-469/24.

cjeu_case ·
3671

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 October 2025.#LQ v Zamestnik izpalnitelen direktor na Darzhaven fond „Zemedelie“.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) – Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 – Support for strategic plans – Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Direct payment for farmers – Areas at the farmers’ disposal – Legal basis for use of those areas – Rules for registration of that legal basis – Areas declared under aid schemes greater than those for which a legal basis was registered – Administrative penalties in cases of over-declaration of areas – Penalties under Article 19a of Regulation (EU) No 640/2014 – Article 19a – Penalties – Applicability of that article following the repeal of Regulation No 640/2014.#Case C-466/24.

cjeu_case ·
3672

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 October 2025.#LQ v Zamestnik izpalnitelen direktor na Darzhaven fond „Zemedelie“.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad - Varna.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) – Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 – Support for strategic plans – Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Direct payment for farmers – Areas at the farmers’ disposal – Legal basis for use of those areas – Rules for registration of that legal basis – Areas declared under aid schemes greater than those for which a legal basis was registered – Administrative penalties in cases of over-declaration of areas – Penalties under Article 19a of Regulation (EU) No 640/2014 – Article 19a – Penalties – Applicability of that article following the repeal of Regulation No 640/2014.#Case C-466/24.

cjeu_case ·
3673

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 23 October 2025.#European Commission v EO.#Appeal – Language arrangements – Open competition EPSO/AD/323/16 – Notice of competition – Limitation of the choice of the second language of the competition to English, French and German – Non-inclusion on the reserve list – Annulment of that notice in another direct action, on account of the language arrangements provided for by that notice – Plea of illegality of that notice of competition – Consequences of that annulment for the examination of the admissibility and of the merits of that plea of illegality – Obligation to examine the existence of a close connection between the grounds of the decision of non-inclusion on that list and the provisions of the competition notice concerned relating to language arrangements.#Case C-385/24 P.

cjeu_case ·
3674

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 23 October 2025.#European Commission v EO.#Appeal – Language arrangements – Open competition EPSO/AD/323/16 – Notice of competition – Limitation of the choice of the second language of the competition to English, French and German – Non-inclusion on the reserve list – Annulment of that notice in another direct action, on account of the language arrangements provided for by that notice – Plea of illegality of that notice of competition – Consequences of that annulment for the examination of the admissibility and of the merits of that plea of illegality – Obligation to examine the existence of a close connection between the grounds of the decision of non-inclusion on that list and the provisions of the competition notice concerned relating to language arrangements.#Case C-385/24 P.

cjeu_case ·
3675

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 October 2025.#Кanevi Komers DS EOOD v Zamestnik izpalnitelen direktor na Darzhaven fond „Zemedelie“.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common agricultural policy (CAP) – Direct support schemes – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 640/2014 – Article 15(1) – Exceptions from the application of administrative penalties – Incorrect aid application – Withdrawal of such an application – Notification to the competent national authorities – Administrative penalties in cases of over-declaration of areas – Penalties under Article 19a of Delegated Regulation No 640/2014 – Applicability of that article following the repeal of Delegated Regulation No 640/2014.#Case C-267/24.

cjeu_case ·
3676

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 October 2025.#Кanevi Komers DS EOOD v Zamestnik izpalnitelen direktor na Darzhaven fond „Zemedelie“.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad - Varna.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common agricultural policy (CAP) – Direct support schemes – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 640/2014 – Article 15(1) – Exceptions from the application of administrative penalties – Incorrect aid application – Withdrawal of such an application – Notification to the competent national authorities – Administrative penalties in cases of over-declaration of areas – Penalties under Article 19a of Delegated Regulation No 640/2014 – Applicability of that article following the repeal of Delegated Regulation No 640/2014.#Case C-267/24.

cjeu_case ·
3677

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 23 October 2025.#Brose Prievidza spol. s r. o. v Direktor na Direktsia 'Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika' - Sofia pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 138(1) – Directive 2008/9/EC – Article 4(b) – Refund of VAT to taxable persons not established in the Member State of refund – Principal supply and ancillary supply – Artificial splitting of a single supply – No dispatch of the object of the supply.#Case C-234/24.

cjeu_case ·
3678

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 23 October 2025.#Brose Prievidza spol. s r. o. v Direktor na Direktsia 'Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika' - Sofia pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 138(1) – Directive 2008/9/EC – Article 4(b) – Refund of VAT to taxable persons not established in the Member State of refund – Principal supply and ancillary supply – Artificial splitting of a single supply – No dispatch of the object of the supply.#Case C-234/24.

cjeu_case ·
3679

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 23 octobre 2025.#Procédure engagée par A Oy.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Fiscalité – Système commun de taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Opérations imposables – Exonération relative à l’octroi de crédits – Article 135, paragraphe 1, sous b) – Exonération relative aux opérations financières – Recouvrement de créances – Article 135, paragraphe 1, sous d) – Affacturage par vente de créances – Affacturage par nantissement.#Affaire C-232/24.

cjeu_case ·
3680

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 23 October 2025.#Proceedings brought by A Oy.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Taxable transactions – Exemption relating to the granting of credit – Article 135(1)(b) – Exemption relating to financial transactions – Debt collection – Article 135(1)(d) – Trade factoring – Invoice factoring.#Case C-232/24.

cjeu_case ·