Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

35041

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 April 2020.#Kerry Luxembourg Sàrl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark TasteSense — Earlier EU word mark MultiSense — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-109/19.

cjeu_case · 29 апреля 2020 г.

35042

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 April 2020.#Kerry Luxembourg Sàrl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark TasteSense — Earlier EU word mark MultiSense — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-109/19.

cjeu_case · 29 апреля 2020 г.

35043

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 April 2020.#Kerry Luxembourg Sàrl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark TasteSense By Kerry — Earlier EU word mark MultiSense — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-108/19.

cjeu_case · 29 апреля 2020 г.

35044

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 April 2020.#Kerry Luxembourg Sàrl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark TasteSense By Kerry — Earlier EU word mark MultiSense — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-108/19.

cjeu_case · 29 апреля 2020 г.

35045

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 April 2020.#Abarca - Companhia de Seguros SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark ABARCA SEGUROS — Earlier EU word mark ABANCA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-106/19.

cjeu_case · 29 апреля 2020 г.

35046

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 April 2020.#Abarca - Companhia de Seguros SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark ABARCA SEGUROS — Earlier EU word mark ABANCA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-106/19.

cjeu_case · 29 апреля 2020 г.

35047

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 April 2020.#Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — European Union figurative mark green cycles — Genuine use of the mark — Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Article 10(3) and (4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 — Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character — Lack of use of the sign as a company logo.#Case T-78/19.

cjeu_case · 29 апреля 2020 г.

35048

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 April 2020.#Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — European Union figurative mark green cycles — Genuine use of the mark — Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Article 10(3) and (4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 — Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character — Lack of use of the sign as a company logo.#Case T-78/19.

cjeu_case · 29 апреля 2020 г.

35049

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 29 April 2020.#Bergslagernas Järnvaruaktiebolag v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a wood-splitting tool — Earlier national design — Ground for invalidity — No individual character — No different overall impression — Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Infringement of the rights of the defence — Article 62 of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-73/19.

cjeu_case · 29 апреля 2020 г.

35050

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 29 April 2020.#Bergslagernas Järnvaruaktiebolag v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a wood-splitting tool — Earlier national design — Ground for invalidity — No individual character — No different overall impression — Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Infringement of the rights of the defence — Article 62 of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-73/19.

cjeu_case · 29 апреля 2020 г.

35051

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 April 2020.#Cimpress Schweiz GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark CIMPRESS — Earlier EU figurative mark impress — Earlier national word mark Impress-Media — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-37/19.

cjeu_case · 29 апреля 2020 г.

35052

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 April 2020.#Cimpress Schweiz GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark CIMPRESS — Earlier EU figurative mark impress — Earlier national word mark Impress-Media — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-37/19.

cjeu_case · 29 апреля 2020 г.

35053

Case T-497/19: Judgment of the General Court of 29 April 2020 — CZ and Others v EEAS (Civil service — Officials — Remuneration — Weighting — Fixed entertainment allowance — Accommodation expenses — Obligation to state reasons — Duty of care — Equivalence in purchasing power — Equal treatment)

cjeu_case · 29 апреля 2020 г.

35054

Case T-496/19: Judgment of the General Court of 29 April 2020 — CV and Others v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Remuneration — Weighting — Fixed entertainment allowance — Accommodation expenses — Obligation to state reasons — Duty of care — Equivalence in purchasing power — Equal treatment)

cjeu_case · 29 апреля 2020 г.

35055

Case T-109/19: Judgment of the General Court of 29 April 2020 — Kerry Luxembourg v EUIPO — Döhler (TasteSense) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark TasteSense — Earlier EU word mark MultiSense — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case · 29 апреля 2020 г.

35056

Case T-108/19: Judgment of the General Court of 29 April 2020 — Kerry Luxembourg v EUIPO — Döhler (TasteSense By Kerry) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark TasteSense By Kerry — Earlier EU word mark MultiSense — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case · 29 апреля 2020 г.

35057

Case T-106/19: Judgment of the General Court of 29 April 2020 — Abarca v EUIPO — Abanca Corporación Bancaria (ABARCA SEGUROS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark ABARCA SEGUROS — Earlier EU word mark ABANCA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 29 апреля 2020 г.

35058

Case T-78/19: Order of the General Court of 29 April 2020 — Lidl Stiftung v EUIPO — Plásticos Hidrosolubles (green cycles) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — European Union figurative mark green cycles — Genuine use of the mark — Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Article 10(3) and (4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 — Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character — Lack of use of the sign as a company logo)

cjeu_case · 29 апреля 2020 г.

35059

Case T-73/19: Judgment of the General Court of 29 April 2020 — Bergslagernas Järnvaru v EUIPO — Scheppach Fabrikation von Holzbearbeitungsmaschinen (Wood-splitting tool) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a wood-splitting tool — Earlier national design — Ground for invalidity — No individual character — No different overall impression — Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Infringement of the rights of the defence — Article 62 of Regulation No 6/2002)

cjeu_case · 29 апреля 2020 г.

35060

Case T-37/19: Judgment of the General Court of 29 April 2020 — Cimpress Schweiz v EUIPO — Impress Media (CIMPRESS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark CIMPRESS — Earlier EU figurative mark impress — Earlier national word mark Impress-Media — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 29 апреля 2020 г.