Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
31984

Case C-642/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Giustizia Amministrativa per la Regione Siciliana (Italy) lodged on 27 November 2020 — Caruter s.r.l. v S.R.R. Messina Provincia S.c.P.A., Comune di Basicò, Comune di Falcone, Comune di Fondachelli Fantina, Comune di Gioiosa Marea, Comune di Librizzi, Comune di Mazzarrà Sant’Andrea, Comune di Montagnareale, Comune di Oliveri, Comune di Piraino, Comune di San Piero Patti, Regione Siciliana — Urega — Ufficio regionale espletamento gare d’appalti lavori pubblici Messina, Regione Siciliana — Assessorato regionale delle infrastrutture e della mobilità

cjeu_case ·
31987

Case T-728/19: Order of the General Court of 27 November 2020 — PL v Commission (Action for annulment — Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to a decision to reassign within the Commission in the interests of the service — Partial refusal of access — Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure — Infringement of essential procedural requirements — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any legal basis)

cjeu_case ·
31988

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 26 November 2020.#Scorify UAB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Prior determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-418/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
31989

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 26 November 2020.#Scorify UAB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Prior determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-418/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
31990

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 26 November 2020.#Colt Technology Services SpA and Others v Ministero della Giustizia and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Principle of non‑discrimination on grounds of nationality – National legislation on pricing of interception activities ordered by judicial authorities – Failure to take into account the principle of full reimbursement of the costs of telecommunications operators – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Lack of sufficient details concerning the factual and regulatory framework of the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need to reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-318/20.

cjeu_case ·
31991

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 26 November 2020.#Colt Technology Services SpA and Others v Ministero della Giustizia and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Principle of non‑discrimination on grounds of nationality – National legislation on pricing of interception activities ordered by judicial authorities – Failure to take into account the principle of full reimbursement of the costs of telecommunications operators – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Lack of sufficient details concerning the factual and regulatory framework of the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need to reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-318/20.

cjeu_case ·
31992

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 November 2020.#VO and Others v SATA International – Azores Airlines SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights – Article 3(3) – Scope – Not included – Passengers travelling for free or at a reduced fare not available directly or indirectly to the public.#Case C-316/20.

cjeu_case ·
31993

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 November 2020.#VO and Others v SATA International – Azores Airlines SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca dos Açores.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights – Article 3(3) – Scope – Not included – Passengers travelling for free or at a reduced fare not available directly or indirectly to the public.#Case C-316/20.

cjeu_case ·
31997

Case C-318/20: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 26 November 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Colt Technology Services SpA, Wind Tre SpA, Telecom Italia SpA, Voidafone Italia SpA, Ministero della Giustizia, Ministero dello Sviluppo economico, Ministero dell’economia e delle finanze v Ministero della Giustizia, Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico, Ministero dell’economia e delle finanze, Wind Tre SpA, Procura generale della Repubblica presso la Corte d’appello di Reggio Calabria, Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Cagliari, Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Roma, Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Locri (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Principle of non-discrimination on grounds of nationality — National legislation on pricing of interception activities ordered by judicial authorities — Failure to take into account the principle of full reimbursement of the costs of telecommunications operators — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Lack of sufficient details concerning the factual and regulatory framework of the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need to reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
31998

Ordonnance de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 26 novembre 2020.#Autostrada Torino Ivrea Valle D’Aosta – Ativa SpA contre Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Attribution de contrats de concession – Directive 2014/23/UE – Article 2, paragraphe 1, premier alinéa – Article 30 – Liberté des pouvoirs adjudicateurs de définir et d’organiser la procédure conduisant au choix du concessionnaire – Réglementation nationale interdisant le recours au financement de projets pour les contrats de concession d’autoroute.#Affaire C-835/19.

cjeu_case ·
31999

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 November 2020.#Autostrada Torino Ivrea Valle D’Aosta – Ativa S.p.A. v Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Award of concession contracts – Directive 2014/23/EU – Article 2(1), first subparagraph – Article 30 – Freedom of contracting authorities to establish and organise the procedure leading to the choice of concessionaire – National legislation prohibiting the use of project financing for motorway concessions.#Case C-835/19.

cjeu_case ·
32000

Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 26 novembre 2020.#Procédure engagée par « DSK Bank » EAD et « FrontEx International » EAD.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure – Protection des consommateurs – Directive 93/13/CEE – Articles 3 et 6 à 8 – Directive 2008/48/CE – Article 22 – Clauses abusives dans les contrats conclus avec les consommateurs – Examen d’office par le juge national – Procédure nationale d’injonction de payer.#Affaire C-807/19.

cjeu_case ·