31801Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 10 December 2020.#Granarolo SpA v Ministero dell'Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 2003/87/EC – Greenhouse gas emission allowance trading scheme – Article 3(e) – Concept of ‘installation’ – Article 3(f) – Concept of ‘operator’ – Points 2 and 3 of Annex I – Aggregation rule – Aggregation of the capacities of the activities in an installation – Transfer of an electricity and heat cogeneration unit by the owner of an industrial facility – Contract for the supply of energy between the transferor and transferee undertakings – Updating of the greenhouse gas emissions permit.#Case C-617/19.cjeu_case · 10 décembre 2020
31802Case C-774/19: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 December 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije — Slovenia) — A. B., B. B. v Personal Exchange International Limited (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Article 15(1) — Jurisdiction over consumer contracts — Concept of ‘consumer’ — Poker playing contract concluded online between a natural person and an organiser of games of chance — Natural person earning a living from online poker games — Knowledge of that person — Regularity of that activity)cjeu_case · 10 décembre 2020
31803Case C-735/19: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 December 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) — Latvia) — Euromin Holdings (Cyprus) Limited (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Company law — Directive 2004/25/EC — Takeover bid — First and second subparagraphs of Article 5(4) — Protection of minority shareholders — Mandatory bid — Method of calculating the share value to determine the equitable price — Power to adjust the equitable price — Exceptions to the standard calculation method under clearly defined circumstances and criteria — Liability of the Member State concerned — Damage suffered by the offeror resulting from a bid that is too high)cjeu_case · 10 décembre 2020
31804Case C-620/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 December 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v D.-H. T. acting as insolvency administrator in relation to the assets of J & S Service UG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Personal data — Regulation (EU) 2016/679 — Article 23 — Restrictions to the data subject’s rights — Significant financial interest — Enforcement of civil law claims — National legislation referring to the provisions of EU law — Tax data concerning a legal entity — Lack of jurisdiction of the Court)cjeu_case · 10 décembre 2020
31805Case C-616/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 December 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland) — Ireland) — M.S., M.W., G.S. v Minister for Justice and Equality (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Asylum policy — Procedure for granting and withdrawing refugee status — Directive 2005/85/EC — Article 25(2) — Grounds for inadmissibility — Rejection by one Member State of an application for international protection as inadmissible due to the earlier grant to the applicant of subsidiary protection in another Member State — Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 — Regulation (EU) No 604/2013)cjeu_case · 10 décembre 2020
31806Case C-347/19: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 December 2020 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Environment — Energy efficiency — Directive 2012/27/EU — Article 9(3) — Heating, cooling and hot water consumption — Installation of individual consumption meters in buildings)cjeu_case · 10 décembre 2020
31807Case C-160/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 10 December 2020 — Comune di Milano v European Commission (Appeal — State aid — Air transport sector — Groundhandling services at Milan-Linate (Italy) and Milan-Malpensa (Italy) airports — Capital injections made by the operator of those airports into its wholly owned subsidiary providing those services — Public shareholding of the operator — Decision declaring those State aid measures unlawful and incompatible with the internal market — Article 107(1) TFEU — Concepts of ‘State resources’, ‘measure imputable to the State’ and ‘economic advantage’ — Private operator principle — Private investor test — Burden of proof — Complex financial assessments — Intensity of judicial review — Distortion of the evidence)cjeu_case · 10 décembre 2020
31808Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 10 décembre 2020.#Finanzamt Kaufbeuren mit Außenstelle Füssen contre Golfclub Schloss Igling eV.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Fiscalité – Taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Article 132, paragraphe 1, sous m) – Exonération de “certaines prestations de services ayant un lien étroit avec la pratique du sport ou de l’éducation physique” – Effet direct – Notion d’“organismes sans but lucratif”.#Affaire C-488/18.cjeu_case · 10 décembre 2020
31809Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 December 2020.#Finanzamt Kaufbeuren mit Außenstelle Füssen v Golfclub Schloss Igling e.V.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 132(1)(m) – Exemption for ‘certain services closely linked to sport or physical education’ – Direct effect – Concept of ‘non-profit-making organisations’.#Case C-488/18.cjeu_case · 10 décembre 2020
31810Case C-488/18: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 December 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — Finanzamt Kaufbeuren mit Außenstelle Füssen v Golfclub Schloss Igling e.V. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 132(1)(m) — Exemption of ‘certain provisions of services closely linked to sport or physical education’ — Direct effect — Concept of ‘non-profit-making organisations’)cjeu_case · 10 décembre 2020
31811Case T-721/20: Action brought on 9 December 2020 — Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking v NGcjeu_case · 9 décembre 2020
31812Case T-720/20: Action brought on 9 December 2020 — Perry Street Software v EUIPO — Toolstream (SCRUFFS)cjeu_case · 9 décembre 2020
31813Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 December 2020.#Almea Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Almea – Earlier national word mark MEA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-190/20.cjeu_case · 9 décembre 2020
31814Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 December 2020.#Almea Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Almea – Earlier national word mark MEA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-190/20.cjeu_case · 9 décembre 2020
31815Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 December 2020.#Promed GmbH kosmetische Erzeugnisse v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Promed – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-30/20.cjeu_case · 9 décembre 2020
31816Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 December 2020.#Promed GmbH kosmetische Erzeugnisse v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Promed – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-30/20.cjeu_case · 9 décembre 2020
31817Case T-190/20: Judgment of the General Court of 9 December 2020 — Almea v EUIPO — Sanacorp Pharmahandel (Almea) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark Almea — Earlier national word mark MEA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 9 décembre 2020
31818Case T-30/20: Judgment of the General Court of 9 December 2020 — Promed v EUIPO — Centrumelektroniki (Promed) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark Promed — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 9 décembre 2020
31819Case C-673/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal judiciaire d’Auch (France) lodged on 9 December 2020 — EP v Préfet du Gers, Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiquescjeu_case · 9 décembre 2020
31820Case C-671/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 9 December 2020 — Criminal proceedings against M.M.cjeu_case · 9 décembre 2020