Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
31261

Case T-844/19: Judgment of the General Court of 20 January 2021 — Apologistics v EUIPO — Peikert (discount-apotheke.de) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark discount-ap*theke.de — Earlier EU word marks APODISCOUNTER and APO and earlier figurative marks apo-discounter.de, apo.co and apo.de — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
31262

Case T-831/19: Judgment of the General Court of 20 January 2021 — Palírna U Zeleného stromu v EUIPO — Bacardi (BLEND 42 FIRST CZECH BLENDED VODKA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark BLEND 42 FIRST CZECH BLENDED VODKA — Earlier EU word mark and international figurative mark 42 BELOW — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Relevant public — Similarity of the goods and services — Similarity of the signs — Global assessment of the likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
31263

Case T-830/19: Judgment of the General Court of 20 January 2021 — Palírna U Zeleného stromu v EUIPO — Bacardi (BLEND 42 VODKA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark BLEND 42 VODKA — Earlier EU word mark and international figurative mark 42 BELOW — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Relevant public — Similarity of the goods and services — Similarity of the signs — Global assessment of the likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
31264

Case T-829/19: Judgment of the General Court of 20 January 2021 — Palírna U Zeleného stromu v EUIPO — Bacardi (BLEND 42 VODKA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark BLEND 42 VODKA — Earlier EU word mark and international figurative mark 42 BELOW — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Relevant public — Similarity of the goods and services — Similarity of the signs — Global assessment of the likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
31271

Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 20 janvier 2021.#Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Sibiu et Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Braşov contre LN.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Fiscalité – Taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Article 2 – Article 9 – Notions d’“activité économique” et d’“assujetti” – Opérations qui visent à retirer d’un bien des recettes ayant un caractère de permanence – Acquisition par un créancier d’immeubles saisis dans le cadre d’une procédure d’exécution forcée engagée en vue du recouvrement de prêts assortis de garanties hypothécaires et vente de ces immeubles – Simple exercice du droit de propriété par son titulaire.#Affaire C-655/19.

cjeu_case ·
31272

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 January 2021.#Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Sibiu and Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Braşov v LN.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 2 – Article 9 – Concepts of ‘economic activity’ and ‘taxable person’ – Transactions which seek to obtain income from goods on a continuing basis – Acquisition by a creditor of immovable property in the context of an enforcement procedure carried out for the purpose of the recovery of loans secured by mortgage guarantees and the sale of those buildings – Simple exercise of the right of ownership by its holder.#Case C-655/19.

cjeu_case ·
31273

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 January 2021.#Land Baden-Württemberg v D.R.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Aarhus Convention – Directive 2003/4/EC – Public access to environmental information – ‘Stuttgart 21’ infrastructure project – Refusal of a request for environmental information – Article 4(1) – Grounds for refusal – Term ‘internal communications’ – Scope – Limitation in time of the protection of such communications.#Case C-619/19.

cjeu_case ·
31274

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 January 2021.#Land Baden-Württemberg v D.R.#Request for a preliminary ruling from Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Aarhus Convention – Directive 2003/4/EC – Public access to environmental information – ‘Stuttgart 21’ infrastructure project – Refusal of a request for environmental information – Article 4(1) – Grounds for refusal – Term ‘internal communications’ – Scope – Limitation in time of the protection of such communications.#Case C-619/19.

cjeu_case ·
31275

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 20 janvier 2021.#Lexel AB contre Skatteverket.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 49 TFUE – Liberté d’établissement – Impôt sur les sociétés – Imposition d’entreprises associées – Réglementation fiscale nationale interdisant à une société ayant son siège dans un État membre la déduction d’intérêts payés à une société établie dans un autre État membre, appartenant au même groupe de sociétés, en cas d’obtention d’un avantage fiscal substantiel.#Affaire C-484/19.

cjeu_case ·
31276

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 January 2021.#Lexel AB v Skatteverket.#Request for a preliminary ruling from Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 49 TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Corporation tax – Taxation of associated companies – National tax legislation prohibiting a company which is established in one Member State from deducting interest paid to a company established in another Member State, belonging to the same group of companies, in the case where a substantial tax benefit is gained.#Case C-484/19.

cjeu_case ·
31277

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 20 janvier 2021.#Maksu- ja Tolliamet contre Heavyinstall OÜ.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Directive 2010/24/UE – Article 16 – Recouvrement des créances relatives aux taxes, impôts, droits et autres mesures – Assistance mutuelle – Demande de mesures conservatoires – Décision judiciaire de l’État membre requérant aux fins de la mise en œuvre de mesures conservatoires – Compétence de la juridiction de l’État membre requis pour apprécier et réévaluer la justification de ces mesures – Principes de confiance mutuelle et de reconnaissance mutuelle.#Affaire C-420/19.

cjeu_case ·
31278

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 January 2021.#Maksu- ja Tolliamet v Heavyinstall OÜ.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2010/24/EU – Article 16 – Recovery of claims relating to taxes, duties and other measures – Mutual assistance – Request for precautionary measures – Judicial decision of the applicant Member State for the purpose of implementing precautionary measures – Jurisdiction of the court of the requested Member State to assess and reassess the justification of those measures – Principles of mutual trust and of mutual recognition.#Case C-420/19.

cjeu_case ·
31279

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 20 janvier 2021.#Commission européenne contre Printeos SA.#Pourvoi – Concurrence – Ententes – Décision constatant une infraction à l’article 101 TFUE – Amendes – Annulation – Remboursement du montant principal de l’amende – Article 266 TFUE – Intérêts moratoires – Distinction entre intérêts moratoires et intérêts compensatoires – Calcul des intérêts – Article 90, paragraphe 4, sous a), seconde phrase, du règlement délégué (UE) no 1268/2012.#Affaire C-301/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
31280

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 January 2021.#European Commission v Printeos, SA.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Decision finding infringement of Article 101 TFEU – Fines – Annulment – Repayment of the principal amount of the fine – Article 266 TFEU – Default interest – Distinction between default interest and compensatory interest – Calculation of interest – Article 90(4)(a), second sentence, of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1268/2012.#Case C-301/19 P.

cjeu_case ·