Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
28901

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 June 2021.#Republic of Lithuania v European Commission.#Appeal – European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – Expenditure excluded from EU financing – Expenditure incurred by the Republic of Lithuania – Regulation (EU) No 65/2011 – Administrative checks – On-the-spot check – Quality of checks – Quality of the applicants – Artificial conditions – Expenditure incurred through projects.#Case C-153/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
28904

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 17 juin 2021.#Simonsen & Weel A/S contre Region Nordjylland og Region Syddanmark.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Marchés publics – Accord-cadre – Directive 2014/24/UE – Article 5, paragraphe 5 – Article 18, paragraphe 1 – Articles 33 et 49 – Annexe V, partie C, points 7, 8 et 10 – Règlement d’exécution (UE) 2015/1986 – Annexe II, rubriques II.1.5 et II.2.6 – Procédures de passation des marchés – Obligation d’indiquer, dans l’avis de marché ou le cahier des charges, d’une part, la quantité estimée ou la valeur estimée et, d’autre part, la quantité maximale ou la valeur maximale des produits à fournir dans le cadre d’un accord-cadre – Principes de transparence et d’égalité de traitement – Directive 89/665/CEE – Article 2 quinquies, paragraphe 1 – Procédures de recours en matière de passation de marchés publics – Absence d’effets du contrat – Exclusion.#Affaire C-23/20.

cjeu_case ·
28905

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 June 2021.#Simonsen & Weel A/S v Region Nordjylland og Region Syddanmark.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Klagenævnet for Udbud.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Framework agreement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 5(5) – Article 18(1) – Articles 33 and 49 – Points 7, 8 and 10 of Part C of Annex V – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1986 – Annex II, fields II.1.5 and II.2.6 – Procurement procedures – Obligation to state, in the contract notice or the tender specifications, first, the estimated quantity or the estimated value and, second, the maximum quantity or the maximum value of the supplies under a framework agreement – Principles of transparency and equal treatment – Directive 89/665/EEC – Article 2d(1) – Procedures for review of the award of public contracts – Ineffectiveness of the contract – Exception.#Case C-23/20.

cjeu_case ·
28906

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 17 June 2021.#Bank Sepah v Overseas Financial Limited and Oaktree Finance Limited.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) – Restrictive measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran – Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 – Freezing of funds of persons, entities or bodies recognised by the Council of the European Union as being engaged in nuclear proliferation – Concepts of ‘freezing of funds’ and ‘freezing of economic resources’ – Possibility of applying a protective measure in respect of frozen funds and economic resources – Claim pre-dating the freezing of assets and unrelated to Iran’s nuclear and ballistic programme.#Case C-340/20.

cjeu_case ·
28907

Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 17 June 2021.#Regione Veneto v Plan Eco Srl.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 – Shipments of waste – Article 3(5) and Article 11(1)(i) – Directive 2008/98/EC – Waste management – Article 16 – Principles of self-sufficiency and proximity – Decision 2000/532/EC – European Waste Catalogue (EWC) – Mixed municipal waste subject to mechanical treatment which does not alter its nature.#Case C-315/20.

cjeu_case ·
28908

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 17 June 2021.#Criminal proceedings against AB and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Bratislava III.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Scope – Article 51 – Implementation of EU law – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Jurisdiction of the Court – Reference made before the issue of a European arrest warrant – Admissibility – Principle ne bis in idem – Article 50 – Concepts of ‘acquittal’ and ‘conviction’ – Amnesty in the issuing Member State – Final decision discontinuing a criminal prosecution – Revocation of the amnesty – Setting-aside of the decision discontinuing the criminal prosecution – Resumption of proceedings – Need for a decision taken after a determination of the criminal liability of the person concerned – Directive 2012/13/EU – Right to information in criminal proceedings – Scope – Concept of ‘criminal proceedings’ – Legislative procedure for the adoption of a resolution relating to the revocation of an amnesty – Judicial procedure for review of the compliance of that resolution with the national Constitution.#Case C-203/20.

cjeu_case ·
28909

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 17 June 2021.#European Commission v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Decision (EU) 2020/245 and 2020/246 – Position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Partnership Council established by the Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Armenia, of the other part – Agreement some provisions of which may be linked with the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) – Adoption of the Rules of Procedure of the Partnership Council and those of the Partnership Committee, subcommittees and other bodies – Adoption of two separate decisions – Choice of legal basis – Article 37 TEU – Article 218(9) TFEU – Voting rules.#Case C-180/20.

cjeu_case ·
28910

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 17 June 2021.#Minister Sprawiedliwości v Prokurator Krajowy – Pierwszy Zastępca Prokuratora Generalnego and Rzecznik Dyscyplinarny Izby Adwokackiej w Warszawie.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Dyscyplinarny Izby Adwokackiej w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Article 267 TFEU – Definition of ‘court or tribunal of a Member State’ – Bar Association Disciplinary Court – Disciplinary investigation initiated against a lawyer – Decision of the Disciplinary Agent finding that there was no disciplinary offence and terminating the investigation – Appeal by the Minister for Justice to the Bar Association Disciplinary Court – Directive 2006/123/EC – Services in the internal market – Article 4, point (6), and Article 10(6) – Authorisation scheme – Withdrawal of authorisation – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Not applicable.#Case C-55/20.

cjeu_case ·