Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
27145

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Global Translation Solutions ltd v European Commission.#Public service contracts – Tendering procedure – Translation services – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid – Award of the contract to another tenderer – Award criteria – Method of evaluation – Manifest error of assessment – Equal treatment – Transparency – Obligation to state reasons – Duty of diligence – Principle of sound administration.#Case T-404/20.

cjeu_case ·
27146

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Global Translation Solutions ltd v European Commission.#Public service contracts – Tendering procedure – Translation services – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid – Award of the contract to another tenderer – Award criteria – Method of evaluation – Manifest error of assessment – Equal treatment – Transparency – Obligation to state reasons – Duty of diligence – Principle of sound administration.#Case T-404/20.

cjeu_case ·
27149

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Dermavita Company SARL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark JUVEDERM – Genuine use of the mark – Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the mark is registered – Use with the consent of the proprietor – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-372/20.

cjeu_case ·
27150

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Dermavita Company SARL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark JUVEDERM – Genuine use of the mark – Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the mark is registered – Use with the consent of the proprietor – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-372/20.

cjeu_case ·
27151

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Indo European Foods Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Abresham Super Basmati Selaa Grade One World’s Best Rice – Earlier non-registered word mark BASMATI – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union and Euratom – Transition period – Interest in bringing proceedings – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Rules governing common law actions for passing off – Likelihood of misrepresentation – Likelihood of dilution of the reputation of the earlier mark.#Case T-342/20.

cjeu_case ·
27152

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Indo European Foods Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Abresham Super Basmati Selaa Grade One World’s Best Rice – Earlier non-registered word mark BASMATI – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union and Euratom – Transition period – Interest in bringing proceedings – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Rules governing common law actions for passing off – Likelihood of misrepresentation – Likelihood of dilution of the reputation of the earlier mark.#Case T-342/20.

cjeu_case ·
27153

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Dochirnie pidpryiemstvo Kondyterska korporatsiia "Roshen" v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Application for an EU figurative mark representing a lobster – Absolute grounds for refusal – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Right to be heard – Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-254/20.

cjeu_case ·
27154

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Dochirnie pidpryiemstvo Kondyterska korporatsiia "Roshen" v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Application for an EU figurative mark representing a lobster – Absolute grounds for refusal – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Right to be heard – Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-254/20.

cjeu_case ·
27155

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#M/S. Indeutsch International v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark representing chevrons between two parallel lines – Absolute ground for refusal – Sign of which an EU trade mark may consist – Article 7(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Obligation to rule on the action – Article 71(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Cross-claim.#Case T-124/20.

cjeu_case ·
27156

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#M/S. Indeutsch International v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark representing chevrons between two parallel lines – Absolute ground for refusal – Sign of which an EU trade mark may consist – Article 7(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Obligation to rule on the action – Article 71(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Cross-claim.#Case T-124/20.

cjeu_case ·
27157

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#IP v European Commission.#Civil service – Members of the contract staff – OLAF investigation – Reimbursement of medical expenses – Disciplinary penalty – Termination of contract without notice – Article 10(h) of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Repeated misconduct – Article 27 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Decision granting a request for the deletion from the personal file of all reference to an earlier penalty – Article 26 of the Staff Regulations – Impossibility of using against an official, and relying on against that official, a penalty, all reference to which has been deleted from the personal file.#Case T-121/20.

cjeu_case ·
27158

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#IP v European Commission.#Civil service – Members of contract staff – OLAF investigation – Reimbursement of medical expenses – Disciplinary penalty – Termination of contract without notice – Article 10(h) of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Repeated misconduct – Article 27 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Decision granting a request for the deletion from the personal file of all reference to an earlier penalty – Article 26 of the Staff Regulations – Impossibility of using against an official, and relying on against that official, a penalty, all reference to which has been deleted from the personal file.#Case T-121/20.

cjeu_case ·
27159

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Jérôme Rivière and Others v European Parliament.#Institutional law – European Parliament – Measure adopted by the President of the European Parliament forbidding national flags being placed on the desks of Members of Parliament – Standards of conduct of Members of Parliament – Article 10(3) of the Parliament’s Rules of Procedure – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility.#Case T-88/20.

cjeu_case ·
27160

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Jérôme Rivière and Others v European Parliament.#Institutional law – European Parliament – Measure adopted by the President of the European Parliament forbidding national flags being placed on the desks of Members of Parliament – Standards of conduct of Members of Parliament – Article 10(3) of the Parliament’s Rules of Procedure – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility.#Case T-88/20.

cjeu_case ·