Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
26181

Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 2 December 2021.#Meta Platforms Ireland Limited v Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände - Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband eV.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 80 – Representation of the data subjects by a not-for-profit association – Representative action brought by a consumer protection association in the absence of a mandate and independently of the infringement of specific rights of a data subject – Action based on the prohibition of unfair commercial practices, the infringement of a consumer protection law or the prohibition of the use of invalid general terms and conditions.#Case C-319/20.

cjeu_case ·
26182

Case C-484/20: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 December 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht München — Germany) — Vodafone Kabel Deutschland GmbH v Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände — Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive (EU) 2015/2366 — Payment services — Article 62(4) — Charges applicable — Article 107(1) — Full harmonisation — Article 115(1) and (2) — Transposition and application — Subscriptions for cable television and internet access — Contracts of indefinite duration concluded before the date for transposition of that directive — Charges applied to payment transactions without direct debit authorisation that are initiated after that date)

cjeu_case ·
26183

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 2 décembre 2021.#Commission européenne et GMB Glasmanufaktur Brandenburg GmbH contre Xinyi PV Products (Anhui) Holdings Ltd.#Pourvoi – Dumping – Importations de vitrage solaire originaire de Chine – Règlement (CE) no 1225/2009 – Article 2, paragraphe 7, sous b) et c) – Statut d’entreprise opérant dans les conditions d’une économie de marché – Refus – Notion de “distorsion importante induite par l’ancien système d’économie planifiée”, au sens de l’article 2, paragraphe 7, sous c), troisième tiret – Avantages fiscaux.#Affaires jointes C-884/19 P et C-888/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
26184

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 December 2021.#European Commission and GMB Glasmanufaktur Brandenburg GmbH v Xinyi PV Products (Anhui) Holdings Ltd.#Appeal – Dumping – Imports of solar glass originating in China – Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 – Article 2(7)(b) and (c) – ‘Undertaking operating under market economy conditions’ status – Denied – Concept of ‘significant distortions carried over from the former non-market economy system’, within the meaning of the third indent of Article 2(7)(c) – Tax incentives.#Joined Cases C-884/19 P and C-888/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
26185

Joined Cases C-884/19 P and C-888/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 December 2021 — European Commission v Xinyi PV Products (Anhui) Holdings Ltd, GMB Glasmanufaktur Brandenburg GmbH (C-884/19 P), GMB Glasmanufaktur Brandenburg GmbH v Xinyi PV Products (Anhui) Holdings Ltd, European Commission (C-888/19 P) (Appeal — Dumping — Imports of solar glass originating in China — Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 — Article 2(7)(b) and (c) — ‘Undertaking operating under market economy conditions’ status — Denied — Concept of ‘significant distortions carried over from the former non-market economy system’, within the meaning of the third indent of Article 2(7)(c) — Tax incentives)

cjeu_case ·
26190

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 December 2021.#Union syndicale Solidaires des services départementaux d'incendie et de secours (SDIS) de France et DOM/TOM v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Filing of a complaint with the Commission concerning the application of EU law – Time limit for reply – Right to good administration – Mandatory due diligence – Reasonable period – No sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals.#Case T-152/21.

cjeu_case ·
26191

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 December 2021.#Union syndicale Solidaires des services départementaux d'incendie et de secours (SDIS) de France et DOM/TOM v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Filing of a complaint with the Commission concerning the application of EU law – Time limit for reply – Right to good administration – Mandatory due diligence – Reasonable period – No sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals.#Case T-152/21.

cjeu_case ·
26192

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 1 December 2021.#Jieyang Defa Industry Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a doll’s head – Earlier design – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Degree of freedom of the designer – No different overall impression – Articles 6 and 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-84/21.

cjeu_case ·
26193

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 1 December 2021.#Jieyang Defa Industry Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a doll’s head – Earlier design – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Degree of freedom of the designer – No different overall impression – Articles 6 and 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-84/21.

cjeu_case ·
26199

Order of the Court *Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 1 December 2021.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-462/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
26200

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 1 December 2021.#Hasbro Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-373/21 P.

cjeu_case ·