25241Case T-73/22: Action brought on 8 February 2022 — Walsall Conduits v EUIPO — Liberty Engineering (Willenhall) (WALSALL CONDUITS)cjeu_case · 8 février 2022
25242Case C-88/22 P: Appeal brought on 8 February 2022 by QB against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 8 December 2021 in Case T-71/21, QB v Commissioncjeu_case · 8 février 2022
25243Case C-85/22: Action brought on 8 February 2022 — European Commission v Republic of Bulgariacjeu_case · 8 février 2022
25244Case C-84/22: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Irlande) made on 8 February 2022 — Right to Know CLG v An Taoiseachcjeu_case · 8 février 2022
25245Case C-83/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia de Cartagena (Spain) lodged on 8 February 2022 — RTG v Tuk Travel, S.L.cjeu_case · 8 février 2022
25246Case C-79/22 P: Appeal brought on 8 February 2022 by Carlos Correia de Matos against the order of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 17 December 2021 in Case T-719/21, Correia de Matos v Commissioncjeu_case · 8 février 2022
25247Case T-707/21: Order of the General Court of 8 February 2022 — Hoteles Olivencia v EUIPO — Corporacion H10 Hotels (HOTELES HO)cjeu_case · 8 février 2022
25248Case T-491/20: Order of the General Court of 8 February 2022 — El Corte Inglés v EUIPO — Ou (-Vpro)cjeu_case · 8 février 2022
25249Case C-82/22 P: Appeal brought on 7 February 2022 by Jean-François Jalkh against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 1 December 2021 in Case T-230/21 Jalkh v Parliamentcjeu_case · 7 février 2022
25250Case C-80/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Bologna (Italy) lodged on 7 February 2022 — BU v Ministero dell’Interno, Dipartimento per le Libertà civili e l’Immigrazione — Unità Dublinocjeu_case · 7 février 2022
25251Case C-78/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrchní soud v Praze (Czech Republic) lodged on 7 February 2022 — ALD Automotive s.r.o. v DY, insolvency administrator of the debtor GEDEM-STAV a.s.cjeu_case · 7 février 2022
25252Order of the President of the General Court of 7 February 2022.#Eurecna SpA v European Commission.#Interim relief – Public supply contracts – Application for interim measures – Lack of any urgency.#Case T-739/21 R.cjeu_case · 7 février 2022
25253Order of the President of the General Court of 7 February 2022.#Eurecna SpA v European Commission.#Interim relief – Public supply contracts – Application for interim measures – Lack of any urgency.#Case T-739/21 R.cjeu_case · 7 février 2022
25254Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 February 2022.#Sonja Faller and Others v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Medicinal products for human use – Variation of the conditional marketing authorisation for the Comirnaty medicinal product for human use – No legal interest in bringing proceedings – No direct concern – No individual concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-464/21.cjeu_case · 7 février 2022
25255Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 February 2022.#Sonja Faller and Others v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Medicinal products for human use – Variation of the conditional marketing authorisation for the Comirnaty medicinal product for human use – No legal interest in bringing proceedings – No direct concern – No individual concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-464/21.cjeu_case · 7 février 2022
25256Case T-739/21 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 7 February 2022 — Eurecna v Commission (Interim relief — Public supply contracts — Application for interim measures — Lack of any urgency)cjeu_case · 7 février 2022
25257Case T-464/21: Order of the General Court of 7 February 2022 — Faller and Others v Commission (Action for annulment — Medicinal products for human use — Variation of the conditional marketing authorisation for the Comirnaty medicinal product for human use — No legal interest in bringing proceedings — No direct concern — No individual concern — Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 7 février 2022
25258Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 February 2022.#Vapo Atlantic SA v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Excise duties – Directive 2008/118/EC – Article 1(2) – Levying, for specific purposes, of other indirect taxes – ‘Specific purposes’ – Definition – Financing of a public undertaking holding the concession contract in respect of the national road network – Objectives of environmental sustainability and reducing accidents – Purely budgetary purpose – Refusal to reimburse a tax based on unjust enrichment – Conditions.#Case C-460/21.cjeu_case · 7 février 2022
25259Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 February 2022.#Vapo Atlantic SA v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa - CAAD).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Excise duties – Directive 2008/118/EC – Article 1(2) – Levying, for specific purposes, of other indirect taxes – ‘Specific purposes’ – Definition – Financing of a public undertaking holding the concession contract in respect of the national road network – Objectives of environmental sustainability and reducing accidents – Purely budgetary purpose – Refusal to reimburse a tax based on unjust enrichment – Conditions.#Case C-460/21.cjeu_case · 7 février 2022
25260Case C-460/21: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) — Portugal) — Vapo Atlantic SA v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Excise duties — Directive 2008/118/EC — Article 1(2) — Levying, for specific purposes, of other indirect taxes — ‘Specific purposes’ — Definition — Financing of a public undertaking holding the concession contract in respect of the national road network — Objectives of environmental sustainability and reducing accidents — Purely budgetary purpose — Refusal to reimburse a tax based on unjust enrichment — Conditions)cjeu_case · 7 février 2022