Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
23601

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 May 2022.#Estaleiros Navais de Peniche SA v Município de Aveiro and Others.#Request for a preliminary reference – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Review procedures in respect of the award of public supply and public works contracts – Directive 89/665/EEC – Article 1(3) – Interest in bringing proceedings – Access to the review procedures – Tenderer excluded by a decision of the contracting authority which has become final, as a result of failing to challenge all the grounds for rejection of its tender – No interest in bringing proceedings.#Case C-787/21.

cjeu_case ·
23602

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 May 2022.#Estaleiros Navais de Peniche SA v Município de Aveiro and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo.#Request for a preliminary reference – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Review procedures in respect of the award of public supply and public works contracts – Directive 89/665/EEC – Article 1(3) – Interest in bringing proceedings – Access to the review procedures – Tenderer excluded by a decision of the contracting authority which has become final, as a result of failing to challenge all the grounds for rejection of its tender – No interest in bringing proceedings.#Case C-787/21.

cjeu_case ·
23605

Case C-787/21: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Portugal) — Estaleiros Navais de Peniche SA v Município de Aveiro, Navaltagus — Reparação e Construção Naval SA, Navalrocha — Sociedade de Construção e Reparações Navais SA (Request for a preliminary reference — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Review procedures in respect of the award of public supply and public works contracts — Directive 89/665/EEC — Article 1(3) — Interest in bringing proceedings — Access to the review procedures — Tenderer excluded by a decision of the contracting authority which has become final, as a result of failing to challenge all the grounds for rejection of its tender — No interest in bringing proceedings)

cjeu_case ·
23606

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 May 2022.#L v Unicaja Banco SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Principle of equivalence – Principle of effectiveness – Mortgage agreement – Unfairness of the ‘floor clause’ in the agreement – National rules concerning the judicial appeal procedure – Limitation of the temporal effects of the declaration that an unfair term is void – Restitution – Power of review by the national appeal court of its own motion.#Case C-869/19.

cjeu_case ·
23607

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 May 2022.#L v Unicaja Banco SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Principle of equivalence – Principle of effectiveness – Mortgage agreement – Unfairness of the ‘floor clause’ in the agreement – National rules concerning the judicial appeal procedure – Limitation of the temporal effects of the declaration that an unfair term is void – Restitution – Power of review by the national appeal court of its own motion.#Case C-869/19.

cjeu_case ·
23608

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 May 2022.#IO v Impuls Leasing România IFN SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Principle of equivalence – Principle of effectiveness – Enforcement proceedings in respect of a leasing contract constituting an enforceable instrument – Objection to enforcement – National legislation not allowing the court hearing that objection to determine whether the terms of an enforceable instrument are unfair – Power of the court hearing the enforcement proceedings to examine of its own motion whether a term is unfair – Existence of an action under ordinary law allowing the review of whether those terms were unfair – Requirement of a security in order to suspend the enforcement proceedings.#Case C-725/19.

cjeu_case ·
23609

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 May 2022.#IO v Impuls Leasing România IFN SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Sector 2 Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Principle of equivalence – Principle of effectiveness – Enforcement proceedings in respect of a leasing contract constituting an enforceable instrument – Objection to enforcement – National legislation not allowing the court hearing that objection to determine whether the terms of an enforceable instrument are unfair – Power of the court hearing the enforcement proceedings to examine of its own motion whether a term is unfair – Existence of an action under ordinary law allowing the review of whether those terms were unfair – Requirement of a security in order to suspend the enforcement proceedings.#Case C-725/19.

cjeu_case ·
23610

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 May 2022.#SPV Project 1503 Srl and Others v YB and Others v YX and ZW.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Principle of equivalence – Principle of effectiveness – Payment order and attachment proceedings against third parties – Force of res judicata implicitly covering the validity of the terms of an enforceable instrument – Power of the court hearing the enforcement proceedings to examine of its own motion the potential unfairness of a term.#Joined Cases C-693/19 and C-831/19.

cjeu_case ·
23611

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 May 2022.#SPV Project 1503 Srl and Others v YB and Others v YX and ZW.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Milano.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Principle of equivalence – Principle of effectiveness – Payment order and attachment proceedings against third parties – Force of res judicata implicitly covering the validity of the terms of an enforceable instrument – Power of the court hearing the enforcement proceedings to examine of its own motion the potential unfairness of a term.#Joined Cases C-693/19 and C-831/19.

cjeu_case ·
23612

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 May 2022.#MA v Ibercaja Banco, SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Principle of equivalence – Principle of effectiveness – Mortgage enforcement proceedings – Unfairness of the term setting the nominal rate for default interest, and of the advanced repayment term in the loan agreement – Force of res judicata and time-barring – Loss of the possibility of relying on the unfairness of a contractual term before a court – Power of review by the national court of its own motion.#Case C-600/19.

cjeu_case ·
23613

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 May 2022.#MA v Ibercaja Banco, SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Zaragoza.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Principle of equivalence – Principle of effectiveness – Mortgage enforcement proceedings – Unfairness of the term setting the nominal rate for default interest, and of the advanced repayment term in the loan agreement – Force of res judicata and time-barring – Loss of the possibility of relying on the unfairness of a contractual term before a court – Power of review by the national court of its own motion.#Case C-600/19.

cjeu_case ·
23614

Case C-869/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo — Spain) — L v Unicaja Banco SA, formerly Banco de Caja España de Inversiones, Salamanca y Soria S.A.U. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Principle of equivalence — Principle of effectiveness — Mortgage agreement — Unfairness of the ‘floor clause’ in the agreement — National rules concerning the judicial appeal procedure — Limitation of the temporal effects of the declaration that an unfair term is void — Restitution — Power of review by the national appeal court of its own motion)

cjeu_case ·
23615

Case C-725/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Sectorului 2 Bucureşti — Romania) — IO v Impuls Leasing România IFN SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Principle of equivalence — Principle of effectiveness — Enforcement proceedings in respect of a leasing contract constituting an enforceable instrument — Objection to enforcement — National legislation not allowing the court hearing that objection to determine whether the terms of an enforceable instrument are unfair — Power of the court hearing the enforcement proceedings to examine of its own motion whether a term is unfair — Existence of an action under ordinary law allowing the review of whether those terms were unfair — Requirement of a security in order to suspend the enforcement proceedings)

cjeu_case ·
23616

Joined Cases C-693/19 and C-831/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 May 2022 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Milano — Italy) — SPV Project 1503 Srl, Dobank SpA v YB (C-693/19), Banco di Desio e della Brianza SpA and Others v YX, ZW (C-831/19) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Principle of equivalence — Principle of effectiveness — Payment order and attachment proceedings against third parties — Force of res judicata implicitly covering the validity of the terms of an enforceable instrument — Power of the court hearing the enforcement proceedings to examine of its own motion the potential unfairness of a term)

cjeu_case ·
23617

Case C-600/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Zaragoza — Spain) — MA v Ibercaja Banco SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Principle of equivalence — Principle of effectiveness — Mortgage enforcement proceedings — Unfairness of the term setting the nominal rate for default interest, and of the advanced repayment term in the loan agreement — Force of res judicata and time-barring — Loss of the possibility of relying on the unfairness of a contractual term before a court — Power of review by the national court of its own motion)

cjeu_case ·