23521Case T-534/21: Order of the General Court of 20 May 2022 — VP v Cedefop (Action for annulment and for damages — Civil service — Temporary staff — Request for renewal of a contract for an indefinite period — Decision not to renew — Action for annulment and for damages — Actionable measure — Manifest inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 20 mai 2022
23522Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 20 May 2022.#Germann Avocats LLC v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – European Union public contracts – Tendering procedure – Award of contracts – Decision to reject a tender and award the contract to another tenderer – Award criteria – Quality control – Distortion of the facts and evidence – Misuse of powers – Obligation to state reasons – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-233/21 P.cjeu_case · 20 mai 2022
23523Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 20 May 2022.#Germann Avocats LLC v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – European Union public contracts – Tendering procedure – Award of contracts – Decision to reject a tender and award the contract to another tenderer – Award criteria – Quality control – Distortion of the facts and evidence – Misuse of powers – Obligation to state reasons – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-233/21 P.cjeu_case · 20 mai 2022
23524Case C-233/21 P: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 20 May 2022 — Germann Avocats LLC v European Commission (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — European Union public contracts — Tendering procedure — Award of contracts — Decision to reject a tender and award the contract to another tenderer — Award criteria — Quality control — Distortion of the facts and evidence — Misuse of powers — Obligation to state reasons — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)cjeu_case · 20 mai 2022
23528Case C-332/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo n.° 17 de Barcelona (Spain) lodged on 19 May 2022 — HM, VD v Generalitat de Catalunyacjeu_case · 19 mai 2022
23529Case T-212/21: Order of the General Court of 19 May 2022 — Groschopp v EUIPO (Sustainability through Quality) (EU trade mark — Revocation of the contested decision — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)cjeu_case · 19 mai 2022
23530Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 May 2022.#TUIfly GmbH v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Access to documents – Documents relating to a procedure for reviewing State aid – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Article 4(2), in fine – Exceptions to the right of access – Overriding public interest – Concept – Principle of sound administration – Article 41(2)(b) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Rights of the defence – Specific aims of the procedure for reviewing State aid – Refusal to grant access – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-764/21 P.cjeu_case · 19 mai 2022
23531Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 May 2022.#TUIfly GmbH v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Access to documents – Documents relating to a procedure for reviewing State aid – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Article 4(2), in fine – Exceptions to the right of access – Overriding public interest – Concept – Principle of sound administration – Article 41(2)(b) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Rights of the defence – Specific aims of the procedure for reviewing State aid – Refusal to grant access – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-764/21 P.cjeu_case · 19 mai 2022
23532Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 May 2022.#Proceedings brought by Frontera Capital SARL.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Notary – Meaning of a ‘court or tribunal’ – Criteria – No dispute before the referring body – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-722/21.cjeu_case · 19 mai 2022
23533Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 May 2022.#Proceedings brought by Frontera Capital SARL.#Request for a preliminary ruling from a notarío del Ilustre Colegio Notarial de Andalucia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Notary – Meaning of a ‘court or tribunal’ – Criteria – No dispute before the referring body – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-722/21.cjeu_case · 19 mai 2022
23534Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 May 2022.#Istituto nazionale per l'assicurazione contro gli infortuni sul lavoro (INAIL) and Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) v Ryanair DAC.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Migrant workers – Social security – Legislation applicable – Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 – Article 14(2)(a)(i) and (ii) – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 11(5) – Article 13(1)(a) and (b) – Concept of ‘operating base’ – Flight and cabin crew – Workers employed in the territory of two or more Member States – Connecting factors.#Case C-33/21.cjeu_case · 19 mai 2022
23535Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 May 2022.#Istituto nazionale per l'assicurazione contro gli infortuni sul lavoro (INAIL) and Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) v Ryanair DAC.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Migrant workers – Social security – Legislation applicable – Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 – Article 14(2)(a)(i) and (ii) – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 11(5) – Article 13(1)(a) and (b) – Concept of ‘operating base’ – Flight and cabin crew – Workers employed in the territory of two or more Member States – Connecting factors.#Case C-33/21.cjeu_case · 19 mai 2022
23536Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 19 May 2022.#VS v Inspektor v Inspektorata kam Visshia sadeben savet.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad - Blagoevgrad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Articles 2, 4 and 6 – Applicability of Regulation 2016/679 – Concept of ‘legitimate interest’ – Concept of ‘task carried out in the public interest or in the exercise of official authority’ – Directive (EU) 2016/680 – Articles 1, 3, 4, 6 and 9 – Lawfulness of the processing of personal data collected in the course of a criminal investigation – Subsequent processing of data relating to a presumed victim of a criminal offence for the purpose of making a formal accusation in respect of him or her – Concept of purpose ‘other than that for which the personal data are collected’ – Data used by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purposes of its defence in an action for damages against the State.#Case C-180/21.cjeu_case · 19 mai 2022
23537Case C-722/21: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from a notario del Ilustre Colegio Notarial de Andalucía — Spain) — Frontera Capital SARL (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Article 267 TFEU — Notary — Meaning of a ‘court or tribunal’ — Criteria — No dispute before the referring body — Manifest inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 19 mai 2022
23538Case C-33/21: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione — Italy) — Istituto nazionale per l’assicurazione contro gli infortuni sul lavoro (INAIL), Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) v Ryanair DAC (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Migrant workers — Social security — Legislation applicable — Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 — Article 14(2)(a)(i) and (ii) — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 11(5) — Article 13(1)(a) and (b) — Concept of ‘operating base’ — Flight and cabin crew — Workers employed in the territory of two or more Member States — Connecting factors)cjeu_case · 19 mai 2022
23539Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 May 2022.#Criminal procedure against IR.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive (EU) 2016/343 – Article 8 – Right to be present at the trial – Information regarding the holding of the trial – Inability to locate the accused person notwithstanding the reasonable efforts of the competent authorities – Possibility of a trial and a conviction in absentia – Article 9 – Right to a new trial, or to another legal remedy, which allows a fresh determination of the merits of the case.#Case C-569/20.cjeu_case · 19 mai 2022
23540Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 May 2022.#Criminal procedure against IR.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive (EU) 2016/343 – Article 8 – Right to be present at the trial – Information regarding the holding of the trial – Inability to locate the accused person notwithstanding the reasonable efforts of the competent authorities – Possibility of a trial and a conviction in absentia – Article 9 – Right to a new trial, or to another legal remedy, which allows a fresh determination of the merits of the case.#Case C-569/20.cjeu_case · 19 mai 2022