2161Case T-73/26: Action brought on 4 February 2026 – Meta Platforms Ireland v Commissioncjeu_case · 4 février 2026
2162Case C-67/26, Napag Italia: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte di Giustizia Tributaria di secondo grado del Lazio – Roma (Italy) lodged on 4 February 2026 – Napag Italia Srl, in liquidation v Agenzia delle Entrate – Direzione Regionale del Laziocjeu_case · 4 février 2026
2163Case C-65/26, Consell Insular de Mallorca: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 4 February 2026 – VN v Consell Insular de Mallorcacjeu_case · 4 février 2026
2164Case C-58/26: Action brought on 4 February 2026 – European Commission v Portuguese Republiccjeu_case · 4 février 2026
2165Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 4 February 2026.#Médis - Companhia portuguesa de seguros de saúde, S. A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark WelMedis – Earlier international registration in respect of the figurative mark médis – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-142/25.cjeu_case · 4 février 2026
2166Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 4 February 2026.#Médis - Companhia portuguesa de seguros de saúde, S. A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark WelMedis – Earlier international registration in respect of the figurative mark médis – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-142/25.cjeu_case · 4 février 2026
2167Case T-142/25: Judgment of the General Court of 4 February 2026 – Médis v EUIPO – RGCC (WelMedis) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark WelMedis – Earlier international registration in respect of the figurative mark médis – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 4 février 2026
2168Case C-689/25, Łuneka: Order of the President of the Court of 4 February 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie – Poland) – Bank BPH S.A. v KP, PPcjeu_case · 4 février 2026
2169Case C-273/25, Erser: Order of the President of the Court of 4 February 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Erfurt – Germany) – S v Meta Platforms Ireland Limitedcjeu_case · 4 février 2026
2170Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 February 2026.#Ján Škor v European Commission.#Action for damages – Non-contractual liability of the European Union – Law governing the institutions – Drinking water supply project in Slovakia – Decision of OLAF not to reopen the investigation or to launch a new one – Limitation – Inadmissibility.#Case T-394/24.cjeu_case · 4 février 2026
2171Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 February 2026.#Ján Škor v European Commission.#Action for damages – Non-contractual liability of the European Union – Law governing the institutions – Drinking water supply project in Slovakia – Decision of OLAF not to reopen the investigation or to launch a new one – Limitation – Inadmissibility.#Case T-394/24.cjeu_case · 4 février 2026
2173Case T-394/24: Judgment of the General Court of 4 February 2026 – Škor v Commission (Action for damages – Non-contractual liability of the European Union – Law governing the institutions – Drinking water supply project in Slovakia – Decision of OLAF not to reopen the investigation or to launch a new one – Limitation – Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 4 février 2026
2174Arrêt du Tribunal (neuvième chambre) du 4 février 2026.#Radical-Consulting UG e.a. contre entreprise commune pour le calcul à haute performance européen.#Recherche et développement technologique – Programme-cadre pour la recherche et l’innovation ‟Horizon Europe” (2021-2027) – Domaine des applications de calcul à haute performance – Appel à propositions en vue de l’octroi d’une subvention – Décision refusant une proposition – Décision rejetant la demande de révision de l’évaluation – Recours en annulation – Qualité pour agir – Intérêt à agir – Recevabilité – Erreur manifeste d’appréciation – Obligation de motivation – Principe de transparence – Égalité de traitement – Article 30 du règlement (UE) 2021/695.#Affaire T-328/23.cjeu_case · 4 février 2026
2175Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 February 2026.#Radical-Consulting UG and Others v European High-Performance Computing Joint Undertaking.#Research and technological development – Horizon Europe Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021-2027) – High-performance computing applications – Call for proposals with a view to the award of a grant – Decision rejecting a proposal – Decision rejecting the request for an evaluation review – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Manifest error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of transparency – Equal treatment – Article 30 of Regulation (EU) 2021/695.#Case T-328/23.cjeu_case · 4 février 2026
2176Case T-328/23: Judgment of the General Court of 4 February 2026 – Radical-Consulting and Others v EuroHPC (Research and technological development – Horizon Europe Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021-2027) – High-performance computing applications – Call for proposals with a view to the award of a grant – Decision rejecting a proposal – Decision rejecting the request for an evaluation review – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Manifest error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of transparency – Equal treatment – Article 30 of Regulation (EU) 2021/695)cjeu_case · 4 février 2026
2177Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 February 2026.#Silex Ipari Automatizálási Zrt. (Silex Zrt.) v European Commission.#Case T-653/22 REC.cjeu_case · 4 février 2026
2178Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 4 February 2026.#Swissgrid AG v European Commission.#Energy – European platforms for the exchange of standard products for balancing energy – Switzerland’s participation – Article 1(6) and (7) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – Letter from the Commission refusing to authorise the Swiss transmission system operator to participate in the platforms – Action for annulment – Challengeable act – Continuing interest in bringing proceedings – Locus standi – Admissibility – Lack of competence of the author of the act.#Case T-127/21 RENV.cjeu_case · 4 février 2026
2179Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 4 February 2026.#Swissgrid AG v European Commission.#Energy – European platforms for the exchange of standard products for balancing energy – Switzerland’s participation – Article 1(6) and (7) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – Letter from the Commission refusing to authorise the Swiss transmission system operator to participate in the platforms – Action for annulment – Challengeable act – Continuing interest in bringing proceedings – Locus standi – Admissibility – Lack of competence of the author of the act.#Case T-127/21 RENV.cjeu_case · 4 février 2026
2180Case T-127/21 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 4 February 2026 – Swissgrid v Commission (Energy – European platforms for the exchange of standard products for balancing energy – Switzerland’s participation – Article 1(6) and (7) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – Letter from the Commission refusing to authorise the Swiss transmission system operator to participate in the platforms – Action for annulment – Challengeable act – Continuing interest in bringing proceedings – Locus standi – Admissibility – Lack of competence of the author of the act)cjeu_case · 4 février 2026