Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161301) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43169) directive (8067)
316 851 documents
8861

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#AirPlus International GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – EU figurative mark +a – Earlier EU figurative mark A+ – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Well-known facts – Refusal of the request for oral proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Article 96(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-407/24.

cjeu_case ·
8862

Arrêt du Tribunal (neuvième chambre) du 9 juillet 2025.#Kinda Makhlouf contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises en raison de la situation en Syrie – Gel des fonds – Restrictions en matière d’admission sur le territoire des États membres – Listes des personnes, des entités et des organismes auxquels s’applique le gel des fonds et des ressources économiques et faisant l’objet de restrictions en matière d’admission sur le territoire des États membres – Maintien du nom du requérant sur les listes – Critère de l’“appartenance familiale” – Article 27, paragraphe 2, sous b), et article 28, paragraphe 2, sous b), de la décision 2013/255/PESC – Droits de la défense – Erreur d’appréciation – Proportionnalité – Droit de propriété – Liberté de circuler et de séjourner dans les États membres – Droit à la vie familiale – Responsabilité non contractuelle.#Affaire T-388/24.

cjeu_case ·
8863

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#Kinda Makhlouf v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – ‘Family membership’ criterion – Article 27(2)(b) and Article 28(2)(b) of Decision 2013/255/CFSP – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Freedom to move and reside in the Member States – Right to family life – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-388/24.

cjeu_case ·
8864

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#Sara Makhlouf v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – ‘Family membership’ criterion – Article 27(2)(b) and Article 28(2)(b) of Decision 2013/255/CFSP – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-387/24.

cjeu_case ·
8865

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#Sara Makhlouf v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – ‘Family membership’ criterion – Article 27(2)(b) and Article 28(2)(b) of Decision 2013/255/CFSP – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-387/24.

cjeu_case ·
8866

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#Ghada Mhana v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – ‘Family membership’ criterion – Article 27(2)(b) and Article 28(2)(b) of Decision 2013/255/CFSP – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-386/24.

cjeu_case ·
8867

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#Ghada Mhana v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – ‘Family membership’ criterion – Article 27(2)(b) and Article 28(2)(b) of Decision 2013/255/CFSP – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-386/24.

cjeu_case ·
8868

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#Target Brands, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark representing three red and white concentric circles – Absolute ground for invalidity – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-347/24.

cjeu_case ·
8869

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#Target Brands, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark representing three red and white concentric circles – Absolute ground for invalidity – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-347/24.

cjeu_case ·
8870

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#sprd.net AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for an EU position mark comprising a capital letter ‘I’ and a red heart on the outside of the back of the neck of an item of clothing – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-306/24.

cjeu_case ·
8871

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#sprd.net AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for an EU position mark comprising a capital letter ‘I’ and a red heart on the outside of the back of the neck of an item of clothing – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-306/24.

cjeu_case ·
8872

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#sprd.net AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for an EU position mark comprising a capital letter ‘I’ and a red heart on a label on the inside of an item of clothing – Position mark – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-305/24.

cjeu_case ·
8873

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#sprd.net AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for an EU position mark comprising a capital letter ‘I’ and a red heart on a label on the inside of an item of clothing – Position mark – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-305/24.

cjeu_case ·
8874

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#sprd.net AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for an EU position mark comprising a capital letter ‘I’ and a red heart on the left side of the chest of an item of clothing – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-304/24.

cjeu_case ·
8875

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#sprd.net AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for an EU position mark comprising a capital letter ‘I’ and a red heart on the left side of the chest of an item of clothing – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-304/24.

cjeu_case ·
8878

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#Compagnie générale des établissements Michelin v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Administrative procedure – Decision ordering an inspection – Article 20(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Subject matter and purpose of the inspection – Obligation to state reasons – Sufficiently serious indicia – Protection of privacy – Judicial review.#Case T-188/24.

cjeu_case ·
8879

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#Compagnie générale des établissements Michelin v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Administrative procedure – Decision ordering an inspection – Article 20(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Subject matter and purpose of the inspection – Obligation to state reasons – Sufficiently serious indicia – Protection of privacy – Judicial review.#Case T-188/24.

cjeu_case ·
8880

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 July 2025.#Bouwbenodigdheden Hoogeveen BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark BIENENBEISSER – Genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the mark is registered – Role of the Nice classification – Homogeneous category of goods – Air vents – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-144/24.

cjeu_case ·