Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161301) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43169) directive (8067)
316 851 documents
7763

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#GB v Minister van Asiel en Migratie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Immigration policy – Return of third-country nationals staying illegally in a Member State – Directive 2008/115/EC – Enforcement of a return decision that has become final – Article 5 – Principle of non-refoulement – Best interests of the child – Family life – Article 15 – Detention for the purpose of removal – Review of compliance with the conditions governing lawfulness – Obligation for the national court to review compliance with the principle of non-refoulement and the other interests referred to in Article 5 of Directive 2008/115 – Considered of Court’s own motion – Articles 6 and 7, Article 19(2), Article 24(2) and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-313/25 PPU.

cjeu_case ·
7764

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#GB v Minister van Asiel en Migratie.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Roermond.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Immigration policy – Return of third-country nationals staying illegally in a Member State – Directive 2008/115/EC – Enforcement of a return decision that has become final – Article 5 – Principle of non-refoulement – Best interests of the child – Family life – Article 15 – Detention for the purpose of removal – Review of compliance with the conditions governing lawfulness – Obligation for the national court to review compliance with the principle of non-refoulement and the other interests referred to in Article 5 of Directive 2008/115 – Considered of Court’s own motion – Articles 6 and 7, Article 19(2), Article 24(2) and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-313/25 PPU.

cjeu_case ·
7765

Case C-19/25, Claim Compass II: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 September 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad – Bulgaria) – ClaimCompass EOOD (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a response by the Court and the relationship between the provisions of EU law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
7766

Affaire C-313/25 PPU, Adrar: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 September 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Roermond – Netherlands) – GB v Minister van Asiel en Migratie (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Immigration policy – Return of third-country nationals staying illegally in a Member State – Directive 2008/115/EC – Enforcement of a return decision that has become final – Article 5 – Principle of non-refoulement – Best interests of the child – Family life – Article 15 – Detention for the purpose of removal – Review of compliance with the conditions governing lawfulness – Obligation for the national court to review compliance with the principle of non-refoulement and the other interests referred to in Article 5 of Directive 2008/115 – Considered of court’s own motion – Articles 6 and 7, Article 19(2), Article 24(2) and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union)

cjeu_case ·
7769

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#Kwizda Pharma GmbH v Landeshauptmann von Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medicinal products – Product which may fall within the definition of ‘medicinal product’ and within the definition of ‘product covered by other Community legislation’ – Applicable legal framework – Directive 2001/83/EC – Article 2(2) – Rule of precedence – Scope – Effectiveness – Procedural autonomy of the Member States – Article 4(3) TEU – Principle of sincere cooperation.#Case C-451/24.

cjeu_case ·
7770

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#Kwizda Pharma GmbH v Landeshauptmann von Wien.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medicinal products – Product which may fall within the definition of ‘medicinal product’ and within the definition of ‘product covered by other Community legislation’ – Applicable legal framework – Directive 2001/83/EC – Article 2(2) – Rule of precedence – Scope – Effectiveness – Procedural autonomy of the Member States – Article 4(3) TEU – Principle of sincere cooperation.#Case C-451/24.

cjeu_case ·
7771

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#Ministero della Giustizia v NZ.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4 – Principle of non-discrimination – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Honorary and ordinary members of the judiciary – Clause 5 – Measures intended to prevent and penalise misuse of successive fixed-term contracts – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 7 – Right to paid annual leave – Article 31 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Assessment procedure in order to be permanently confirmed as an honorary member of the judiciary – Waiver, by operation of law, of claims arising from service as an honorary member of the judiciary prior to the assessment procedure – Loss of a right to paid annual leave conferred by EU law.#Case C-253/24.

cjeu_case ·
7772

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#Ministero della Giustizia v NZ.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte di Appello di L’Aquila.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4 – Principle of non-discrimination – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Honorary and ordinary members of the judiciary – Clause 5 – Measures intended to prevent and penalise misuse of successive fixed-term contracts – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 7 – Right to paid annual leave – Article 31 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Assessment procedure in order to be permanently confirmed as an honorary member of the judiciary – Waiver, by operation of law, of claims arising from service as an honorary member of the judiciary prior to the assessment procedure – Loss of a right to paid annual leave conferred by EU law.#Case C-253/24.

cjeu_case ·
7773

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#RT and ED v Ineo Infracom.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Collective redundancies – Directive 98/59/EC – Article 1(1) – Scope – Concept of ‘redundancy’ – Collective internal mobility agreement – Redundancies for economic reasons based on the refusal to apply that agreement – Termination of the employment contract on the employer’s initiative for one or more reasons not related to the individual workers concerned – Article 2 – Procedures for information and consultation with workers’ representatives.#Case C-249/24.

cjeu_case ·
7774

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#RT and ED v Ineo Infracom.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Collective redundancies – Directive 98/59/EC – Article 1(1) – Scope – Concept of ‘redundancy’ – Collective internal mobility agreement – Redundancies for economic reasons based on the refusal to apply that agreement – Termination of the employment contract on the employer’s initiative for one or more reasons not related to the individual workers concerned – Article 2 – Procedures for information and consultation with workers’ representatives.#Case C-249/24.

cjeu_case ·
7775

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#LEGO A/S v Pozitív Energiaforrás Kft.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Community design – Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Article 8(3) – Design allowing the multiple assembly or connection of mutually interchangeable products within a modular system – Scope of the protection conferred by such a design – Article 10 – Concept of ‘informed user’ – Article 89(1) – Sanctions in actions for infringement – Special reasons allowing the national court not to make the orders provided for in that provision – Infringement in respect of the pieces of a toy building set, the number of which is small in relation to total number of components of that set.#Case C-211/24.

cjeu_case ·
7776

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#LEGO A/S v Pozitív Energiaforrás Kft.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Community design – Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Article 8(3) – Design allowing the multiple assembly or connection of mutually interchangeable products within a modular system – Scope of the protection conferred by such a design – Article 10 – Concept of ‘informed user’ – Article 89(1) – Sanctions in actions for infringement – Special reasons allowing the national court not to make the orders provided for in that provision – Infringement in respect of the pieces of a toy building set, the number of which is small in relation to total number of components of that set.#Case C-211/24.

cjeu_case ·
7777

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#KN v Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security – Migrant workers – Legislation applicable – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 13(1) – Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 – Article 14(8) and (10) – Worker normally employed in several Member States – Pursuit of less than 25% of the activity in the Member State of residence – Concept of ‘substantial part of the activity’ – Connecting factors relating to working time and/or remuneration – Consideration of other circumstances – Length of the assessment period – Discretion of the competent institutions.#Case C-203/24.

cjeu_case ·
7778

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#KN v Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security – Migrant workers – Legislation applicable – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 13(1) – Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 – Article 14(8) and (10) – Worker normally employed in several Member States – Pursuit of less than 25% of the activity in the Member State of residence – Concept of ‘substantial part of the activity’ – Connecting factors relating to working time and/or remuneration – Consideration of other circumstances – Length of the assessment period – Discretion of the competent institutions.#Case C-203/24.

cjeu_case ·
7779

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#CP v Nissan Iberia SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 101 TFEU – Principle of effectiveness – Actions for damages for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union – Limitation period – Determination of the dies a quo – Knowledge of the information necessary for bringing an action for damages – Publication on the website of a national competition authority of its decision finding an infringement of the competition rules – Binding effect of a decision of a national competition authority which is not yet final – Suspension or interruption of the limitation period – Stay of the main proceedings before the court hearing an action for damages – Directive 2014/104/EU – Article 10 – Temporal application.#Case C-21/24.

cjeu_case ·
7780

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#CP v Nissan Iberia SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil n° 1 de Zaragoza.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 101 TFEU – Principle of effectiveness – Actions for damages for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union – Limitation period – Determination of the dies a quo – Knowledge of the information necessary for bringing an action for damages – Publication on the website of a national competition authority of its decision finding an infringement of the competition rules – Binding effect of a decision of a national competition authority which is not yet final – Suspension or interruption of the limitation period – Stay of the main proceedings before the court hearing an action for damages – Directive 2014/104/EU – Article 10 – Temporal application.#Case C-21/24.

cjeu_case ·