Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161340) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43225) directive (8067)
316 946 documents
31561

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Trend Glass sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark ECO STORAGE – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Legal certainty – Equal treatment.#Case T-777/21.

cjeu_case ·
31562

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Trend Glass sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark ECO STORAGE – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Legal certainty – Equal treatment.#Case T-777/21.

cjeu_case ·
31565

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Pharmadom v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark WellBe PHARMACEUTICALS – Earlier national word mark WELL AND WELL – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity between the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-644/21.

cjeu_case ·
31566

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Pharmadom v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark WellBe PHARMACEUTICALS – Earlier national word mark WELL AND WELL – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity between the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-644/21.

cjeu_case ·
31569

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 21 December 2022.#E. Breuninger GmbH & Co. v European Commission.#Action for annulment – State aid – Framework system to establish a federal compensation scheme in Germany for losses caused by lockdown decisions – Decision not to raise any objections – Aid to make good the damage caused by natural disasters or other exceptional occurrences – No interest in bringing proceedings – Inadmissibility.#Case T-525/21.

cjeu_case ·
31570

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 21 December 2022.#E. Breuninger GmbH & Co. v European Commission.#Action for annulment – State aid – Framework system to establish a federal compensation scheme in Germany for losses caused by lockdown decisions – Decision not to raise any objections – Aid to make good the damage caused by natural disasters or other exceptional occurrences – No interest in bringing proceedings – Inadmissibility.#Case T-525/21.

cjeu_case ·
31573

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 21 December 2022.#Falke KGaA v European Commission.#State aid – Framework system to grant support for uncovered fixed costs in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany – Decision not to raise any objections – Temporary Framework for State aid measures – Individual examination of the aid scheme notified – Measure aimed at remedying a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State – Proportionality.#Case T-306/21.

cjeu_case ·
31574

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 21 December 2022.#Falke KGaA v European Commission.#State aid – Framework system to grant support for uncovered fixed costs in the context of the COVID‑19 pandemic in Germany – Decision not to raise any objections – Temporary Framework for State aid measures – Individual examination of the aid scheme notified – Measure aimed at remedying a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State – Proportionality.#Case T-306/21.

cjeu_case ·
31575

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 21 December 2022.#E. Breuninger GmbH & Co. v European Commission.#State aid – Framework system to grant support for uncovered fixed costs in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany – Decision not to raise any objections – Temporary Framework for State aid measures – Individual examination of the aid scheme notified – Measure aimed at remedying a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State – Proportionality.#Case T-260/21.

cjeu_case ·
31576

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 21 December 2022.#E. Breuninger GmbH & Co. v European Commission.#State aid – Framework system to grant support for uncovered fixed costs in the context of the COVID‑19 pandemic in Germany – Decision not to raise any objections – Temporary Framework for State aid measures – Individual examination of the aid scheme notified – Measure aimed at remedying a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State – Proportionality.#Case T-260/21.

cjeu_case ·
31577

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Viktor Pavlovych Pshonka v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-243/21.

cjeu_case ·
31578

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Viktor Pavlovych Pshonka v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-243/21.

cjeu_case ·
31579

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Artem Viktorovych Pshonka v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-242/21.

cjeu_case ·
31580

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Artem Viktorovych Pshonka v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-242/21.

cjeu_case ·