18761Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 March 2023.#Tinnus Enterprises LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing fluid distribution equipment – Ground for invalidity – Non-compliance with requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function – Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-555/21.cjeu_case · 29 марта 2023 г.
18762Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 March 2023.#Tinnus Enterprises LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing fluid distribution equipment – Ground for invalidity – Non-compliance with requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function – Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-555/21.cjeu_case · 29 марта 2023 г.
18763Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 March 2023.#Tinnus Enterprises LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing fluid distribution equipment – Ground for invalidity – Non-compliance with requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function – Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-545/21.cjeu_case · 29 марта 2023 г.
18764Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 March 2023.#Tinnus Enterprises LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing fluid distribution equipment – Ground for invalidity – Non-compliance with requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function – Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-545/21.cjeu_case · 29 марта 2023 г.
18765Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 March 2023.#Tinnus Enterprises LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing fluid distribution equipment – Ground for invalidity – Non-compliance with requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function – Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-535/21.cjeu_case · 29 марта 2023 г.
18766Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 March 2023.#Tinnus Enterprises LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing fluid distribution equipment – Ground for invalidity – Non-compliance with requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function – Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-535/21.cjeu_case · 29 марта 2023 г.
18767Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 March 2023.#Tinnus Enterprises LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing fluid distribution equipment – Ground for invalidity – Non-compliance with requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function – Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-505/21.cjeu_case · 29 марта 2023 г.
18768Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 March 2023.#Tinnus Enterprises LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing fluid distribution equipment – Ground for invalidity – Non-compliance with requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function – Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-505/21.cjeu_case · 29 марта 2023 г.
18769Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 March 2023.#ZR v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Civil service – Officials – Vacancy notice – Application for interinstitutional transfer – First paragraph of Article 8 of the Staff Regulations – Transfer refusal – Priority order – Article 29(1) of the Staff Regulations – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Duty of care – Corrigendum.#Case T-400/21.cjeu_case · 29 марта 2023 г.
18770Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 March 2023.#ZR v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Civil service – Officials – Vacancy notice – Application for interinstitutional transfer – First paragraph of Article 8 of the Staff Regulations – Transfer refusal – Priority order – Article 29(1) of the Staff Regulations – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Duty of care – Corrigendum.#Case T-400/21.cjeu_case · 29 марта 2023 г.
18771Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 29 March 2023.#Plusmusic AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark +music – Earlier national figurative mark + – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier mark acquired through use.#Case T-344/21.cjeu_case · 29 марта 2023 г.
18772Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 29 March 2023.#Plusmusic AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark +music – Earlier national figurative mark + – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier mark acquired through use.#Case T-344/21.cjeu_case · 29 марта 2023 г.
18773Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 March 2023 (Extracts).#Wizz Air Hungary Légiközlekedési Zrt. (Wizz Air Hungary Zrt.) v European Commission.#State aid – Romanian air transport market – Aid granted by Romania to Blue Air in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Blue Air rescue aid – Loan guaranteed by the Romanian State – Decision not to raise any objections – Action for annulment – Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Article 107(2)(b) TFEU – Assessment of the damage – Causal link – Beneficiary’s pre-existing difficulties – Taking avoidable costs into account – Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring non-financial undertakings in difficulty – Article 107(3)(c) TFEU – Contribution of the aid to an objective of common interest – ‘One time, last time’ condition for rescue aid – Principle of non-discrimination – Freedom to provide services – Freedom of establishment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-142/21.cjeu_case · 29 марта 2023 г.
18774Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 March 2023 (Extracts).#Wizz Air Hungary Légiközlekedési Zrt. (Wizz Air Hungary Zrt.) v European Commission.#State aid – Romanian air transport market – Aid granted by Romania to Blue Air in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Blue Air rescue aid – Loan guaranteed by the Romanian State – Decision not to raise any objections – Action for annulment – Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Article 107(2)(b) TFEU – Assessment of the damage – Causal link – Beneficiary’s pre-existing difficulties – Taking avoidable costs into account – Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring non-financial undertakings in difficulty – Article 107(3)(c) TFEU – Contribution of the aid to an objective of common interest – ‘One time, last time’ condition for rescue aid – Principle of non-discrimination – Freedom to provide services – Freedom of establishment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-142/21.cjeu_case · 29 марта 2023 г.
18775Case T-588/21: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2023 — Tinnus Enterprises v EUIPO — Mystic Products and Koopman International (Fluid distribution equipment) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a part of the fluid distribution equipment — Ground for invalidity — Non-compliance with requirements for protection — Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function — Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002)cjeu_case · 29 марта 2023 г.
18776Case T-578/21: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2023 — Tinnus Enterprises v EUIPO — Mystic Products and Koopman International (Fluid distribution equipment) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing fluid distribution equipment — Ground for invalidity — Non-compliance with requirements for protection — Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function — Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002)cjeu_case · 29 марта 2023 г.
18777Case T-577/21: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2023 — Tinnus Enterprises v EUIPO — Mystic Products and Koopman International (Fluid distribution equipment) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing fluid distribution equipment — Ground for invalidity — Non-compliance with requirements for protection — Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function — Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002)cjeu_case · 29 марта 2023 г.
18778Case T-576/21: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2023 — Tinnus Enterprises v EUIPO — Mystic Products and Koopman International (Fluid distribution equipment) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing fluid distribution equipment — Ground for invalidity — Non-compliance with requirements for protection — Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function — Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002)cjeu_case · 29 марта 2023 г.
18779Case T-575/21: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2023 — Tinnus Enterprises v EUIPO — Mystic Products and Koopman International (Fluid distribution equipment) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing fluid distribution equipment — Ground for invalidity — Non-compliance with requirements for protection — Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function — Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002)cjeu_case · 29 марта 2023 г.
18780Case T-555/21: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2023 — Tinnus Enterprises v EUIPO — Mystic Products (Fluid distribution equipment) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing fluid distribution equipment — Ground for invalidity — Non-compliance with requirements for protection — Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function — Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002)cjeu_case · 29 марта 2023 г.