18741Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 March 2023.#Perfetti Van Melle SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for an EU figurative mark representing a cylindrical container with a wavy outline – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-199/22.cjeu_case · 29 марта 2023 г.
18742Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 March 2023.#Perfetti Van Melle SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for an EU figurative mark representing a cylindrical container with a wavy outline – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-199/22.cjeu_case · 29 марта 2023 г.
18743Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 March 2023.#Compagnie industrielle de la matière végétale (CIMV) v European Commission.#Research and technological development – Grant agreement concluded in the context of the ‘Horizon 2020’ Framework Programme for Research and Innovation – Recovery of a debt – Repayment by instalments – Substantive accuracy of the facts – Manifest error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons – Legitimate expectations – Right to be heard – Proportionality.#Case T-26/22.cjeu_case · 29 марта 2023 г.
18744Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 March 2023.#Compagnie industrielle de la matière végétale (CIMV) v European Commission.#Research and technological development – Grant agreement concluded in the context of the ‘Horizon 2020’ Framework Programme for Research and Innovation – Recovery of a debt – Repayment by instalments – Substantive accuracy of the facts – Manifest error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons – Legitimate expectations – Right to be heard – Proportionality.#Case T-26/22.cjeu_case · 29 марта 2023 г.
18745Case T-343/22: Order of the General Court of 29 March 2023 — Mozelsio v Commission (Civil service — Contract staff — Retirement pensions — Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the EU — Transfer to the EU scheme — Additional years of pensionable service — Action for annulment — Claim for repayment of part of the capital transferred — Unjust enrichment — Time limit for complaints — Manifest inadmissibility — Application for an order — Manifest lack of jurisdiction)cjeu_case · 29 марта 2023 г.
18746Case T-342/22: Order of the General Court of 29 March 2023 — Oxyzoglou v Commission (Civil service — Contract staff — Retirement pensions — Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the EU — Transfer to the EU scheme — Additional years of pensionable service — Action for annulment — Claim for repayment of part of the capital transferred — Unjust enrichment — Time limit for complaints — Manifest inadmissibility — Application for an order — Manifest lack of jurisdiction)cjeu_case · 29 марта 2023 г.
18747Case T-436/22: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2023 — Machková v EUIPO — Aceites Almenara (ALMARA SOAP) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark ALMARA SOAP — Earlier EU word mark ALMENARA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 29 марта 2023 г.
18748Case T-308/22: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2023 — celotec v EUIPO — Decotec Printing (DECOTEC) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark DECOTEC — Absolute ground for invalidity — Lack of descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 29 марта 2023 г.
18749Case T-199/22: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2023 — Perfetti Van Melle v EUIPO (Representation of a cylindrical container with a wavy outline) (EU trade mark — Application for an EU figurative mark representing a cylindrical container with a wavy outline — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons)cjeu_case · 29 марта 2023 г.
18750Case T-26/22: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2023 — CIMV v Commission (Research and technological development — Grant agreement concluded in the context of the ‘Horizon 2020’ Framework Programme for Research and Innovation — Recovery of a debt — Repayment by instalments — Substantive accuracy of the facts — Manifest error of assessment — Obligation to state reasons — Legitimate expectations — Right to be heard — Proportionality)cjeu_case · 29 марта 2023 г.
18751Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 March 2023.#Tinnus Enterprises LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a part of the fluid distribution equipment – Ground for invalidity – Non-compliance with requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function – Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-588/21.cjeu_case · 29 марта 2023 г.
18752Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 March 2023.#Tinnus Enterprises LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a part of the fluid distribution equipment – Ground for invalidity – Non-compliance with requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function – Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-588/21.cjeu_case · 29 марта 2023 г.
18753Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 March 2023.#Tinnus Enterprises LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing fluid distribution equipment – Ground for invalidity – Non-compliance with requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function – Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-578/21.cjeu_case · 29 марта 2023 г.
18754Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 March 2023.#Tinnus Enterprises LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing fluid distribution equipment – Ground for invalidity – Non-compliance with requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function – Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-578/21.cjeu_case · 29 марта 2023 г.
18755Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 March 2023.#Tinnus Enterprises LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing fluid distribution equipment – Ground for invalidity – Non-compliance with requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function – Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-577/21.cjeu_case · 29 марта 2023 г.
18756Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 March 2023.#Tinnus Enterprises LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing fluid distribution equipment – Ground for invalidity – Non-compliance with requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function – Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-577/21.cjeu_case · 29 марта 2023 г.
18757Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 March 2023.#Tinnus Enterprises LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing fluid distribution equipment – Ground for invalidity – Non-compliance with requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function – Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-576/21.cjeu_case · 29 марта 2023 г.
18758Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 March 2023.#Tinnus Enterprises LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing fluid distribution equipment – Ground for invalidity – Non-compliance with requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function – Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-576/21.cjeu_case · 29 марта 2023 г.
18759Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 March 2023.#Tinnus Enterprises LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing fluid distribution equipment – Ground for invalidity – Non-compliance with requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function – Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-575/21.cjeu_case · 29 марта 2023 г.
18760Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 March 2023.#Tinnus Enterprises LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing fluid distribution equipment – Ground for invalidity – Non-compliance with requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function – Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-575/21.cjeu_case · 29 марта 2023 г.