18561Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 19 April 2023.#Gerhard Grund Gerüste e.K. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Josef Grund Gerüstbau – Earlier national figurative mark grund – Relative ground for invalidity – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity between the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-749/21.cjeu_case · 19 апреля 2023 г.
18562Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 19 April 2023.#Gerhard Grund Gerüste e.K. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Josef Grund Gerüstbau – Earlier national figurative mark grund – Relative ground for invalidity – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity between the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-749/21.cjeu_case · 19 апреля 2023 г.
18563Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 19 April 2023.#PP and Others v European Parliament.#Civil service – Officials – Health crisis linked to the COVID-19 pandemic – Decision authorising part-time work in order to take care of relatives outside the place of employment – No possibility of teleworking full time outside the place of employment – Irregularity in the pre-litigation procedure – Decision granting a request to work part time – No legal interest in bringing proceedings – Inadmissibility – Remuneration – Suspension of the expatriation allowance – Articles 62 and 69 of the Staff Regulations – Infringement of Article 4 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations.#Case T-39/21.cjeu_case · 19 апреля 2023 г.
18564Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 19 April 2023.#PP and Others v European Parliament.#Civil service – Officials – Health crisis linked to the COVID-19 pandemic – Decision authorising part-time work in order to take care of relatives outside the place of employment – No possibility of teleworking full time outside the place of employment – Irregularity in the pre-litigation procedure – Decision granting a request to work part time – No legal interest in bringing proceedings – Inadmissibility – Remuneration – Suspension of the expatriation allowance – Articles 62 and 69 of the Staff Regulations – Infringement of Article 4 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations.#Case T-39/21.cjeu_case · 19 апреля 2023 г.
18565Case T-749/21: Judgment of the General Court of 19 April 2023 — Gerhard Grund Gerüste v EUIPO — Josef-Grund-Gerüstbau (Josef Grund Gerüstbau) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark Josef Grund Gerüstbau — Earlier national figurative mark grund — Relative ground for invalidity — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity between the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 19 апреля 2023 г.
18566Case T-39/21: Judgment of the General Court of 19 April 2023 — PP and Others v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Health crisis linked to the COVID-19 pandemic — Decision authorising part-time work in order to take care of relatives outside the place of employment — No possibility of teleworking full time outside the place of employment — Irregularity in the pre-litigation procedure — Decision granting a request to work part time — No legal interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissibility — Remuneration — Suspension of the expatriation allowance — Articles 62 and 69 of the Staff Regulations — Infringement of Article 4 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations)cjeu_case · 19 апреля 2023 г.
18567Case T-215/23: Action brought on 18 April 2023 — ClientEarth and Others v Commissioncjeu_case · 18 апреля 2023 г.
18568Case T-214/23: Action brought on 18 April 2023 — Greenpeace and Others v Commissioncjeu_case · 18 апреля 2023 г.
18569Case T-202/23: Action brought on 18 April 2023 — Kivikoski and Others v Councilcjeu_case · 18 апреля 2023 г.
18570Case C-249/23 P: Appeal brought on 18 April 2023 by ClientEarth AISBL against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 01 February 2023 in Case T-354/21, ClientEarth v Commissioncjeu_case · 18 апреля 2023 г.
18571Case C-248/23, Novo Nordisk: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 18 April 2023 — Novo Nordisk AS v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatóságacjeu_case · 18 апреля 2023 г.
18572Case C-247/23, Deldits: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 18 April 2023 — VP v Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóságcjeu_case · 18 апреля 2023 г.
18573Case C-243/23, Drebers: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Beroep te Gent (Belgium) lodged on 18 April 2023 — Belgian State / Federale Overheidsdienst Financiën v L BVcjeu_case · 18 апреля 2023 г.
18574Case C-242/23, Tecno*37: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 18 April 2023 — Tecno*37 v Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico, Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato e Agricoltura di Bolognacjeu_case · 18 апреля 2023 г.
18575Case C-241/23, Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Warszawie: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland) lodged on 18 April 2023 — P. sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Warszawiecjeu_case · 18 апреля 2023 г.
18576Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 April 2023.#X and Others v État belge.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Immigration policy – Directive 2003/86/EC – Right to family reunification – Article 5(1) – Submission of an application for entry and residence for the purposes of exercising the right to family reunification – Legislation of a Member State requiring the sponsor’s family members to submit the application in person to the competent diplomatic post of that Member State – Impossibility or excessive difficulty to reach that post – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 7 and 24.#Case C-1/23 PPU.cjeu_case · 18 апреля 2023 г.
18577Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 April 2023.#X and Others v État belge.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance francophone de Bruxelles.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Immigration policy – Directive 2003/86/EC – Right to family reunification – Article 5(1) – Submission of an application for entry and residence for the purposes of exercising the right to family reunification – Legislation of a Member State requiring the sponsor’s family members to submit the application in person to the competent diplomatic post of that Member State – Impossibility or excessive difficulty to reach that post – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 7 and 24.#Case C-1/23 PPU.cjeu_case · 18 апреля 2023 г.
18578Case C-1/23 PPU, Afrin: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 April 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance francophone de Bruxelles — Belgium) — X, Y, A, legally represented by X and Y, B, legally represented by X and Y v État belge (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Border controls, asylum and immigration — Immigration policy — Directive 2003/86/EC — Right to family reunification — Article 5(1) — Submission of an application for entry and residence for the purposes of exercising the right to family reunification — Legislation of a Member State requiring the sponsor’s family members to submit the application in person to the competent diplomatic post of that Member State — Impossibility or excessive difficulty to reach that post — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Articles 7 and 24)cjeu_case · 18 апреля 2023 г.
18579Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 18 April 2023.#Shopify Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request demonstrating that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal allowed to proceed.#Case C-751/22 P.cjeu_case · 18 апреля 2023 г.
18580Order of the Court of 18 April 2023.#Shopify Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request demonstrating that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal allowed to proceed.#Case C-751/22 P.cjeu_case · 18 апреля 2023 г.