Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
18382

Case C-352/21, A1 and A2 (Insurance of a pleasure craft): Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 April 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret — Denmark) — A1, A2 v I (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Rules of jurisdiction in matters relating to insurance — Article 15(5) — Possibility of departing from those jurisdictional rules by agreement — Article 16(5) — Directive 2009/138/EC — Article 13(27) — Concept of ‘large risks’ — Hull insurance contract — Jurisdiction clause between the insurer and the insured — Enforceability of that clause against the insured — Pleasure craft not used for commercial purposes)

cjeu_case ·
18385

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 April 2023.#L Fund v Finanzamt D.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 63 TFEU – Free movement of capital – Corporation tax – Taxation of income from immovable property situated within the territory of a Member State – Difference in treatment between resident funds and non-resident funds – Exemption only for resident funds – Comparability of situations – Taking into account of the tax system of investors – None – Justification – Need to preserve the coherence of the national tax system – Need to preserve a balanced distribution of power of taxation between the Member States – None.#Case C-537/20.

cjeu_case ·
18386

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 April 2023.#L Fund v Finanzamt D.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 63 TFEU – Free movement of capital – Corporation tax – Taxation of income from immovable property situated within the territory of a Member State – Difference in treatment between resident funds and non-resident funds – Exemption only for resident funds – Comparability of situations – Taking into account of the tax system of investors – None – Justification – Need to preserve the coherence of the national tax system – Need to preserve a balanced distribution of power of taxation between the Member States – None.#Case C-537/20.

cjeu_case ·
18387

Case C-537/20, L Fund: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 April 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — L Fund v Finanzamt D (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 63 TFEU — Free movement of capital — Corporate income tax — Taxation of income from immovable property situated within the territory of a Member State — Difference in treatment between resident funds and non-resident funds — Exemption for resident funds only — Comparability of situations — Taking into account of the tax system of investors — None — Justification — Need to preserve the coherence of the national tax system — Need to preserve a balanced distribution of the power of taxation between Member States — None)

cjeu_case ·
18398

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 26 April 2023.#Pinar Kuruyemiş Gida Ve Ihtiyaç Maddeleri Sanayi Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark pinar KURUYEMIȘ – Earlier German word mark PINAR – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Suspension of proceedings – Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-148/22.

cjeu_case ·
18399

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 26 April 2023.#Pinar Kuruyemiş Gida Ve Ihtiyaç Maddeleri Sanayi Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark pinar KURUYEMIȘ – Earlier German word mark PINAR – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Suspension of proceedings – Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-148/22.

cjeu_case ·
18400

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 26 April 2023.#Pinar Kuruyemiş Gida Ve Ihtiyaç Maddeleri Sanayi Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark pinar KURUYEMIȘ – Earlier German word mark PINAR – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Suspension of proceedings – Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-147/22.

cjeu_case ·