Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
18313

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 April 2023.#Ministero della Giustizia v SP.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 53 and 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Scope of the obligation on national courts or tribunals of last instance to make a reference for a preliminary ruling – Exceptions to that obligation – Criteria – Situations in which the correct interpretation of EU law is so obvious as to leave no scope for any reasonable doubt – Condition related to the national court or tribunal of last instance being convinced that the matter would be equally obvious to the other courts or tribunals of last instance of the Member States and to the Court of Justice.#Case C-495/22.

cjeu_case ·
18314

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 April 2023.#Ministero della Giustizia v SP.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 53 and 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Scope of the obligation on national courts or tribunals of last instance to make a reference for a preliminary ruling – Exceptions to that obligation – Criteria – Situations in which the correct interpretation of EU law is so obvious as to leave no scope for any reasonable doubt – Condition related to the national court or tribunal of last instance being convinced that the matter would be equally obvious to the other courts or tribunals of last instance of the Member States and to the Court of Justice.#Case C-495/22.

cjeu_case ·
18315

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 April 2023.#GO and Others v Regione Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 53 and 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Article 267 TFEU – Scope of the obligation on national courts or tribunals of last instance to make a reference for a preliminary ruling – Exceptions to that obligation – Criteria – Situations in which the correct interpretation of EU law is so obvious as to leave no scope for any reasonable doubt – Condition related to the national court or tribunal of last instance being convinced that the matter would be equally obvious to the other courts or tribunals of last instance of the Member States and to the Court of Justice.#Case C-482/22.

cjeu_case ·
18316

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 April 2023.#GO and Others v Regione Lazio.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 53 and 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Article 267 TFEU – Scope of the obligation on national courts or tribunals of last instance to make a reference for a preliminary ruling – Exceptions to that obligation – Criteria – Situations in which the correct interpretation of EU law is so obvious as to leave no scope for any reasonable doubt – Condition related to the national court or tribunal of last instance being convinced that the matter would be equally obvious to the other courts or tribunals of last instance of the Member States and to the Court of Justice.#Case C-482/22.

cjeu_case ·
18317

Order of the President of the Court of 27 April 2023.#European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) v Nowhere Co. Ltd.#Appeal – Intervention – Second paragraph of Article 40 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Interest in the result of the case – EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Rejection of the opposition – Refusal to take into account earlier rights protected in the United Kingdom – Relevant stage of the procedure for assessing the existence of a relative ground for refusal – Association of proprietors of trade marks and professionals in that field with the purpose of promoting trade mark law – Allowed.#Case C-337/22 P.

cjeu_case ·
18318

Order of the President of the Court of 27 April 2023.#European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) v Nowhere Co. Ltd.#Appeal – Intervention – Second paragraph of Article 40 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Interest in the result of the case – EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Rejection of the opposition – Refusal to take into account earlier rights protected in the United Kingdom – Relevant stage of the procedure for assessing the existence of a relative ground for refusal – Association of proprietors of trade marks and professionals in that field with the purpose of promoting trade mark law – Allowed.#Case C-337/22 P.

cjeu_case ·
18319

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 27 April 2023.#CM v DN.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and in the matters of parental responsibility – Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 – Articles 9 and 15 – Continuing jurisdiction of the courts of the Member State of the child’s former habitual residence following the child having moved – Concept of ‘moving’ – Application for modification of a decision relating to access rights – Calculation of the time limit within which such an application must be submitted – Transfer of the case to a court of the Member State of the child’s new habitual residence, better placed to hear the case.#Case C-372/22.

cjeu_case ·
18320

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 27 April 2023.#CM v DN.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d'arrondissement de Luxembourg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and in the matters of parental responsibility – Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 – Articles 9 and 15 – Continuing jurisdiction of the courts of the Member State of the child’s former habitual residence following the child having moved – Concept of ‘moving’ – Application for modification of a decision relating to access rights – Calculation of the time limit within which such an application must be submitted – Transfer of the case to a court of the Member State of the child’s new habitual residence, better placed to hear the case.#Case C-372/22.

cjeu_case ·