Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
18165

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 May 2023.#Vanhove v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark bistro Régent – Earlier national word mark REGENT – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a), and Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character.#Case T-437/22.

cjeu_case ·
18166

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 May 2023.#Vanhove v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark bistro Régent – Earlier national word mark REGENT – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a), and Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character.#Case T-437/22.

cjeu_case ·
18168

Case T-437/22: Judgment of the General Court of 10 May 2023 — Vanhove v EUIPO — Aldi Einkauf (bistro Régent) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark bistro Régent — Earlier national word mark REGENT — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a), and Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character)

cjeu_case ·
18173

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 May 2023.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Danish and Swedish air transport markets – Aid granted by Denmark and Sweden to an airline in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Recapitalisation of SAS – Decision not to raise any objections – Actions for annulment – Individual concern – Substantial effect on the competitive position – Admissibility – Temporary Framework for State aid measures – Aid to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State – Compliance with the requirements of the Temporary Framework.#Case T-238/21.

cjeu_case ·
18174

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 May 2023.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Danish and Swedish air transport markets – Aid granted by Denmark and Sweden to an airline in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Recapitalisation of SAS – Decision not to raise any objections – Actions for annulment – Individual concern – Substantial effect on the competitive position – Admissibility – Temporary Framework for State aid measures – Aid to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State – Compliance with the requirements of the Temporary Framework.#Case T-238/21.

cjeu_case ·
18177

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 May 2023.#Ryanair DAC and Condor Flugdienst GmbH v European Commission.#State aid – German air transport market – Aid granted by Germany to an airline in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Recapitalisation of Deutsche Lufthansa – Decision not to raise any objections – Temporary Framework for State aid measures – Actions for annulment – Locus standi – Substantial effect on competitive position – Admissibility – Significant market power – Additional measures to preserve effective competition on the market – Obligation to state reasons.#Joined Cases T-34/21 and T-87/21.

cjeu_case ·
18178

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 May 2023.#Ryanair DAC and Condor Flugdienst GmbH v European Commission.#State aid – German air transport market – Aid granted by Germany to an airline in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Recapitalisation of Deutsche Lufthansa – Decision not to raise any objections – Temporary Framework for State aid measures – Actions for annulment – Locus standi – Substantial effect on competitive position – Admissibility – Significant market power – Additional measures to preserve effective competition on the market – Obligation to state reasons.#Joined Cases T-34/21 and T-87/21.

cjeu_case ·