Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
16661

Case T-291/22: Judgment of the General Court of 6 September 2023 — Pumpyanskiy v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine — Freezing of funds — Inclusion of the applicant's name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned — Obligation to state reasons — Error of assessment — Concept of ‘association’ — Proportionality — Legal certainty)

cjeu_case ·
16662

Case T-277/22: Judgment of the General Court of 6 September 2023 — Groz-Beckert v EUIPO (Position of the colours red and white on cuboid packaging) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU trade mark consisting in the application of the colours red and white to cuboid packaging — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion — Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
16663

Case T-276/22: Judgment of the General Court of 6 September 2023 — Groz-Beckert v EUIPO (Position of the colours white, red and dark green on cuboid packaging) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU trade mark consisting in the application of the colours white, red and dark green to cuboid packaging — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion — Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
16664

Case T-272/22: Judgment of the General Court of 6 September 2023 –Pumpyanskaya v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine — Freezing of funds — Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned — Error of assessment — Concept of ‘association’ — Proportionality)

cjeu_case ·
16665

Case T-270/22: Judgment of the General Court of 6 September 2023 — Pumpyanskiy v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine — Freezing of funds — Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned — Error of assessment — Concept of ‘leading businessperson’ — Proportionality)

cjeu_case ·
16666

Case T-252/22: Judgment of the General Court of 6 September 2023 — Timchenko v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine — Freezing of funds — Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned — Obligation to state reasons — Article 2(1)(a) and (d) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP — Error of assessment — Right to be heard)

cjeu_case ·
16667

Case T-171/22: Judgment of the General Court of 6 September 2023 — OR and OS v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Retirement pension — Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the European Union — Transfer to the EU scheme — Period of less than 10 years’ service — Death — Refusal to repay capital representing national pension rights transferred and pension rights acquired in the PSEUI — Article 11(1) and Article 12(1)(b) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations — Unjust enrichment)

cjeu_case ·
16668

Case T-108/22: Judgment of the General Court of 6 September 2023 — Sopra Steria Benelux and Unisys Belgium v Commission (Public service contracts — Tendering procedure — Services for the specification, development, maintenance and support of IT platforms for the Directorate-General Taxation and Customs Union — Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of a previous decision — Rejection of the tender submitted by a tenderer and award of the contract to the tenderer whose tender had initially been accepted — Execution of a judgment of the General Court — Article 266 TFEU — Manifest error of assessment)

cjeu_case ·
16669

Case T-107/22: Judgment of the General Court of 6 September 2023 — Adega Ponte da Boga v EUIPO — Viñedos y Bodegas Dominio de Tares (P3 DOMINIO DE TARES) (European Union trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — European Union figurative mark P3 DOMINIO DE TARES — Earlier national figurative mark P PONTE DA BOGA — Relative ground for invalidity — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
16670

Case T-45/22: Judgment of the General Court of 6 September 2023 — Weider Germany v EUIPO — Den i Nosht (YIPPIE!) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark YIPPIE! — Earlier EU word mark Yuppie — Relative ground for invalidity — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 57(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 64(2) of Regulation 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
16671

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 September 2023.#Criminal proceedings against SC Vlad Magic SRL, en liquidation and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Statement of the reasons justifying the need for an interpretation of certain provisions of European Union law by the Court of Justice and of the relationship between those provisions and the national legislation applicable – Insufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-230/22.

cjeu_case ·
16672

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 September 2023.#Criminal proceedings against KN and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Lehliu-Gară.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Statement of the reasons justifying the need for an interpretation of certain provisions of European Union law by the Court of Justice and of the relationship between those provisions and the national legislation applicable – Insufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-230/22.

cjeu_case ·
16673

Case C-539/22 P: Order of the President of the Court of 6 September 2023 — Antonio Del Valle Ruíz, Alejandra Pérez Mina, Alejandro Finkler Kudler, Alonso de Garay Gutiérrez, Arantzazu Del Valle Diharce, Arturo Grinberg Kreimerman, Carlos Ruíz Sacristán, Edmundo Del Valle Diharce, Elias Abadi Cherem, Enrique Rojas Blásquez, Eugenio Santiago Clariond Reyes, Fernando Ramos González de Castilla, Gerardo Madrazo Gómez, Germán Larrea Mota Velasco, Jacobo Troice Jalife, Jaime Abadi Cherem, Jorge Esteve Recolons, José Eduardo Del Valle Diharce, José Manuel Fierro Von Mohr, José María Casanueva Y Llaguno, Juan Pablo Del Valle Perochena, Julio Andrés Maza Casas, Luís de Garay Russ, Luis Francisco Suinaga Aguilár, María de Guadalupe Del Valle Perochena, Rogelio Barrenechea Cuenca, Xochitl Montero De Garay, Inmobiliaria Asturval, SA de CV, Bauhaus Partners Ltd, DGFam Fund, LP, Eureka Global Pte Ltd, Fideicomiso 70385-0 Bancomer (Antonio Cosío y Familia), Tanoak Ltd, GBM Capital Bursátil, SA de CV, Fondo de Inversión de Renta Variable, GBM Fondo de Inversión Total, SA de CV, Fondo de Inversión de Renta Variable, GBM Global, SA de CV, Fondo de Inversión de Renta Variable, Grow Investments LP, Grupo Bursátil Mexicano, SA de CV, Casa de Bolsa, Hechos con Amor, SA de CV, Miura LP, Simple Investments LP, Terra Gamma Partners CV v European Commission, Single Resolution Board, Kingdom of Spain, European Parliament, Council of the European Union, Banco Santander SA

cjeu_case ·
16674

Case C-230/22, Vlad Magic: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 September 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Lehliu-Gară — Romania) — criminal proceedings against KN, LY OC, DW (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Statement of the reasons justifying the need for an interpretation of certain provisions of European Union law by the Court of Justice and of the relationship between those provisions and the national legislation applicable — Insufficient information — Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
16677

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 September 2023.#DPG Deutsche Pfandsystem GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for an EU figurative mark representing a bottle and an arrow – Earlier EU figurative mark representing a can, a bottle and an arrow – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 42(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-774/21.

cjeu_case ·
16678

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 September 2023.#DPG Deutsche Pfandsystem GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for an EU figurative mark representing a bottle and an arrow – Earlier EU figurative mark representing a can, a bottle and an arrow – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 42(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-774/21.

cjeu_case ·
16679

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 September 2023.#Foodwatch eV v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Preparatory document for a meeting of the RCF – CETA between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union and its Member States, of the other part – Partial refusal of access – Exception relating to the protection of the public interest in matters of international relations – Obligation to state reasons – Obligation to carry out a concrete examination.#Case T-643/21.

cjeu_case ·
16680

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 September 2023.#Foodwatch eV v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Preparatory document for a meeting of the RCF – CETA between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union and its Member States, of the other part – Partial refusal of access – Exception relating to the protection of the public interest in matters of international relations – Obligation to state reasons – Obligation to carry out a concrete examination.#Case T-643/21.

cjeu_case ·