15381Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#VU and IT v EUROBANK BULGARIA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Apelativen sad - Sofia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 3(1) and Article 4 – Assessment of the unfairness of contractual terms – Contractual term that is in plain, intelligible language – Bank loan agreement denominated in a foreign currency – Term that places the exchange risk entirely on the consumer – Advantage not specifically agreed upon for the benefit of the credit institution resulting from the conversion, into the settlement currency, of the amount of the loan expressed in the currency of the account – Article 6 – Consequences of a finding that a contractual term is unfair.#Case C-117/23.cjeu_case · 18 октября 2023 г.
15382Case C-631/23, Servoprax: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 18 October 2023 — Servoprax GmbH v Hauptzollamt Duisburgcjeu_case · 18 октября 2023 г.
15383Case C-117/23, Eurobank Bulgaria: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 October 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Apelativen sad — Sofia — Bulgaria) — VU, IT v EUROBANK BULGARIA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Article 3(1) and Article 4 — Assessment of the unfairness of contractual terms — Contractual term that is in plain, intelligible language — Bank loan agreement denominated in a foreign currency — Term that places the exchange risk entirely on the consumer — Advantage not specifically agreed upon for the benefit of the credit institution resulting from the conversion, into the settlement currency, of the amount of the loan expressed in the currency of the account — Article 6 — Consequences of a finding that a contractual term is unfair)cjeu_case · 18 октября 2023 г.
15384Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#Bourbon Offshore Interoil Shipping - Navegação, Lda v European Commission.#State aid – Free Zone of Madeira – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme – Concept of ‘existing aid’ within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-721/22.cjeu_case · 18 октября 2023 г.
15385Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#Bourbon Offshore Interoil Shipping - Navegação, Lda v European Commission.#State aid – Free Zone of Madeira – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme – Concept of ‘existing aid’ within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-721/22.cjeu_case · 18 октября 2023 г.
15386Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#Newalliance Comércio Internacional, Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) and Others v European Commission.#State aid – Madeira Free Zone – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market, and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme – Obligation to state reasons – Reasonable time – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Right to a fair trial – Actions manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Cases T-683/22 to T-688/22, T-690/22 to T-693/22, T-695/22 to T-701/22, T-707/22 and T-708/22.cjeu_case · 18 октября 2023 г.
15387Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#Newalliance Comércio Internacional, Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) and Others v European Commission.#State aid – Madeira Free Zone – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market, and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme – Obligation to state reasons – Reasonable time – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Right to a fair trial – Actions manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Cases T-683/22 to T-688/22, T-690/22 to T-693/22, T-695/22 to T-701/22, T-707/22 and T-708/22.cjeu_case · 18 октября 2023 г.
15388Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#Nagolimad - Serviços Internacionais, SA v European Commission.#State aid – Madeira Free Zone – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market, and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme – Obligation to state reasons – Concept of ‘existing aid’ within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Reasonable time – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Right to a fair hearing – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-668/22.cjeu_case · 18 октября 2023 г.
15389Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#Nagolimad - Serviços Internacionais, SA v European Commission.#State aid – Madeira Free Zone – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market, and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme – Obligation to state reasons – Concept of ‘existing aid’ within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Reasonable time – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Right to a fair hearing – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-668/22.cjeu_case · 18 октября 2023 г.
15390Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#Renco Valore SpA and Seopult LTD v European Commission.#State aid – Madeira Free Zone – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market, and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme – Concept of ‘existing aid’ within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Additional pleas put forward by the intervener – Admissibility – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Cases T-588/22 and T-660/22.cjeu_case · 18 октября 2023 г.
15391Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#Renco Valore SpA and Seopult LTD v European Commission.#State aid – Madeira Free Zone – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market, and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme – Concept of ‘existing aid’ within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Additional pleas put forward by the intervener – Admissibility – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Cases T-588/22 and T-660/22.cjeu_case · 18 октября 2023 г.
15392Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#Somniare, Unipessoal, Lda and Others v European Commission.#State aid – Madeira Free Zone – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market, and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme – Obligation to state reasons – Concept of ‘existing aid’ within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Reasonable time – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Right to a fair hearing – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Cases T-460/22, T-461/22, T-464/22, T-550/22, T-551/22 and T-553/22.cjeu_case · 18 октября 2023 г.
15393Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#Somniare, Unipessoal, Lda and Others v European Commission.#State aid – Madeira Free Zone – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market, and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme – Obligation to state reasons – Concept of ‘existing aid’ within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Reasonable time – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Right to a fair hearing – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Cases T-460/22, T-461/22, T-464/22, T-550/22, T-551/22 and T-553/22.cjeu_case · 18 октября 2023 г.
15394Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#RN v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Civil service – Officials – EUIPO staff – Remuneration – Family allowances – Payment of allowances to a third person in the name and on behalf of the official – Decision no longer to pay certain allowances to a third person in the name and on behalf of the official.#Case T-606/22.cjeu_case · 18 октября 2023 г.
15395Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#RN v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Civil service – Officials – EUIPO staff – Remuneration – Family allowances – Payment of allowances to a third person in the name and on behalf of the official – Decision no longer to pay certain allowances to a third person in the name and on behalf of the official.#Case T-606/22.cjeu_case · 18 октября 2023 г.
15396Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#Sports Group Denmark A/S v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark ENDURANCE – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Legal certainty – Equal treatment.#Case T-566/22.cjeu_case · 18 октября 2023 г.
15397Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#Sports Group Denmark A/S v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark ENDURANCE – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Legal certainty – Equal treatment.#Case T-566/22.cjeu_case · 18 октября 2023 г.
15398Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#NZ v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Internal competition COM/1/AD 10/18 – Decision not to include the applicant on the reserve list – Equal treatment – Stability in the composition of the selection board – Unlimited jurisdiction – Non-material damage.#Case T-535/22.cjeu_case · 18 октября 2023 г.
15399Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#NZ v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Internal competition COM/1/AD 10/18 – Decision not to include the applicant on the reserve list – Equal treatment – Stability in the composition of the selection board – Unlimited jurisdiction – Non-material damage.#Case T-535/22.cjeu_case · 18 октября 2023 г.
15400Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#European Investment Bank v République arabe syrienne.#Arbitration clause – Loan agreement concerning a project for the reinforcement of the electricity distribution system in a third country – Non-performance of the agreement – Repayment of the sums advanced – Default interest – Procedure by default.#Case T-469/22.cjeu_case · 18 октября 2023 г.