15241Case T-1049/23: Action brought on 30 October 2023 — Bloom v Commissioncjeu_case · 30 октября 2023 г.
15242Case T-1051/23: Action brought on 27 October 2023 — Pomilio Blumm v EUIPOcjeu_case · 27 октября 2023 г.
15243Order of the Court of 27 October 2023.#Brooks England Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-504/23 P.cjeu_case · 27 октября 2023 г.
15244Order of the Court of 27 October 2023.#Brooks England Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-504/23 P.cjeu_case · 27 октября 2023 г.
15245Order of the Court of 27 October 2023.#Wallmax Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-495/23 P.cjeu_case · 27 октября 2023 г.
15246Order of the Court of 27 October 2023.#Wallmax Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-495/23 P.cjeu_case · 27 октября 2023 г.
15247Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 27 October 2023.#British Airways plc v European Commission.#Appeal – Action for annulment and for damages – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision relating to proceedings under Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Annulment by the General Court – Repayment by the European Commission of the principal amount of the fine without interest – Claim by the appellant for interest and compound interest – Remedies – Article 266 TFEU – Failure of the Commission to take a measure necessary to comply with a judgment annulling one of its decisions – Action for damages – Second paragraph of Article 340 TFEU – Limitation period – Article 263 TFEU – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Act confirming a previous measure – Inadmissibility – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-138/23 P.cjeu_case · 27 октября 2023 г.
15248Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 27 October 2023.#British Airways plc v European Commission.#Appeal – Action for annulment and for damages – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision relating to proceedings under Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Annulment by the General Court – Repayment by the European Commission of the principal amount of the fine without interest – Claim by the appellant for interest and compound interest – Remedies – Article 266 TFEU – Failure of the Commission to take a measure necessary to comply with a judgment annulling one of its decisions – Action for damages – Second paragraph of Article 340 TFEU – Limitation period – Article 263 TFEU – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Act confirming a previous measure – Inadmissibility – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-138/23 P.cjeu_case · 27 октября 2023 г.
15249Case C-646/23, Lita: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojskowy Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 27 October 2023 — Criminal proceedings against P.B.cjeu_case · 27 октября 2023 г.
15250Order of the President of the General Court of 27 October 2023.#Nikita Dmitrievich Mazepin v Council of the European Union.#Interim relief – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of Russian actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Application for interim measures – Partial inadmissibility – Prima facie case – Urgency – Weighing up of interests.#Case T-743/22 RIII.cjeu_case · 27 октября 2023 г.
15251Order of the President of the General Court of 27 October 2023.#Nikita Dmitrievich Mazepin v Council of the European Union.#Interim relief – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of Russian actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Application for interim measures – Inadmissibility.#Case T-743/22 RIII.cjeu_case · 27 октября 2023 г.
15252Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 October 2023.#AFG, SA (Zona Franca da Madeira) v European Commission.#State aid – Madeira Free Zone – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market, and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme – Definition of ‘State aid’ – Existing aid within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Proportionality – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-722/22.cjeu_case · 27 октября 2023 г.
15253Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 October 2023.#AFG, SA (Zona Franca da Madeira) v European Commission.#State aid – Madeira Free Zone – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market, and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme – Definition of ‘State aid’ – Existing aid within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Proportionality – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-722/22.cjeu_case · 27 октября 2023 г.
15254Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 October 2023.#Eutelsat Madeira, Unipessoal, Lda ( Zona Franca da Madeira) and Others v European Commission.#State aid – Madeira Free Trade Zone – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding the scheme contrary to Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring that scheme incompatible with the internal market and ordering the recovery of the aid paid pursuant thereto – Obligation to state reasons – Concept of ‘existing aid’ within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Principles of non-discrimination and of equal treatment – Actions manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Cases T-718/22 and T-723/22.cjeu_case · 27 октября 2023 г.
15255Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 October 2023.#Eutelsat Madeira, Unipessoal, Lda ( Zona Franca da Madeira) and Others v European Commission.#State aid – Madeira Free Trade Zone – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding the scheme contrary to Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring that scheme incompatible with the internal market and ordering the recovery of the aid paid pursuant thereto – Obligation to state reasons – Concept of ‘existing aid’ within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Principles of non-discrimination and of equal treatment – Actions manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Cases T-718/22 and T-723/22.cjeu_case · 27 октября 2023 г.
15256Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 October 2023.#Nutmark, Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) and Piamark, Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) v European Commission.#State aid – Madeira Free Zone – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring that scheme to be incompatible with the internal market, and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme – Obligation to state reasons – Concept of ‘State aid’ – Existing aid within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Right to private property – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Cases T-714/22 and T-715/22.cjeu_case · 27 октября 2023 г.
15257Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 October 2023.#Nutmark, Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) and Piamark, Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) v European Commission.#State aid – Madeira Free Zone – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring that scheme to be incompatible with the internal market, and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme – Obligation to state reasons – Concept of ‘State aid’ – Existing aid within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Right to private property – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Cases T-714/22 and T-715/22.cjeu_case · 27 октября 2023 г.
15258Case T-743/22 R III: Order of the President of the General Court of 27 October 2023 — Mazepin v Council (Interim relief — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in respect of Russian actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine — Freezing of funds and economic resources — Application for interim measures — Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 27 октября 2023 г.
15259Case T-722/22: Order of the General Court of 27 October 2023 — AFG v Commission (Madeira Free Zone) (State aid — Madeira Free Zone — Aid scheme implemented by Portugal — Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market, and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme — Definition of ‘State aid’ — Existing aid within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 — Recovery — Legitimate expectations — Legal certainty — Proportionality — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)cjeu_case · 27 октября 2023 г.
15260Cases T-718/22 and T-723/22: Order of the General Court of 27 October 2023 — Eutelsat Madeira and Others v Commission (Madeira Free Trade Zone) (State aid — Madeira Free Trade Zone — Aid scheme implemented by Portugal — Decision finding the scheme contrary to Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring that scheme incompatible with the internal market and ordering the recovery of the aid paid pursuant thereto — Obligation to state reasons — Concept of ‘existing aid’ within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 — Recovery — Legitimate expectations — Legal certainty — Principles of non-discrimination and of equal treatment — Actions manifestly lacking any foundation in law)cjeu_case · 27 октября 2023 г.