Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
15187

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 November 2023.#GM v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1)TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Independence of judges – Directive 2000/78/EC – Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age – Interpretation not necessary for the referring court to be able to give judgment – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-333/23.

cjeu_case ·
15188

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 November 2023.#GM v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Gießen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1)TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Independence of judges – Directive 2000/78/EC – Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age – Interpretation not necessary for the referring court to be able to give judgment – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-333/23.

cjeu_case ·
15191

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 November 2023.#Investcapital Ltd v XF and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Directive 93/13/EEC – Consumer contracts – Scope – Article 1(2) – Exclusion of contractual terms which reflect mandatory statutory or regulatory provisions – Clause reflecting a national mandatory statutory provision conferring on a lender the right to assign claims arising from a loan agreement entered into with a consumer, without the consent of the latter.#Case C-177/23.

cjeu_case ·
15192

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 November 2023.#Investcapital Ltd v XF and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Specializat Mureş.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Directive 93/13/EEC – Consumer contracts – Scope – Article 1(2) – Exclusion of contractual terms which reflect mandatory statutory or regulatory provisions – Clause reflecting a national mandatory statutory provision conferring on a lender the right to assign claims arising from a loan agreement entered into with a consumer, without the consent of the latter.#Case C-177/23.

cjeu_case ·
15194

Case C-333/23, Habonov: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 November 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Gießen — Germany) — GM v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 267 TFEU — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Independence of judges — Directive 2000/78/EC — Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age — Interpretation necessary for the referring court to be able to give judgment — Absence — Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
15196

Case C-177/23, Investcapital: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 November 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Specializat Mureş — Romania) — Investcapital Ltd v XF, KJ (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law — Directive 93/13/EEC — Consumer contracts — Scope — Article 1(2) — Exclusion of contractual terms which reflect mandatory statutory or regulatory provisions — Clause reflecting a national mandatory statutory provision conferring on a lender the right to assign claims arising from a loan agreement entered into with a consumer, without the consent of the latter)

cjeu_case ·
15197

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 November 2023.#SkinIdent AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark NIVEA SKIN-IDENTICAL Q10 – National trade mark and international registration of earlier word mark SKINIDENT – Earlier company name Skinident – Relative grounds for refusal – Absence of a likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Use in trade of a sign of more than mere local significance – Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Sector proximity – Application of national law by EUIPO – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-665/22.

cjeu_case ·
15198

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 November 2023.#SkinIdent AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark NIVEA SKIN-IDENTICAL Q10 – National trade mark and international registration of earlier word mark SKINIDENT – Earlier company name Skinident – Relative grounds for refusal – Absence of a likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Use in trade of a sign of more than mere local significance – Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Sector proximity – Application of national law by EUIPO – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-665/22.

cjeu_case ·