14001Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 January 2024.#Industria de Diseño Textil, SA (Inditex) v Buongiorno Myalert SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive 2008/95/EC – Article 6(1)(c) – Limitation of the effects of the trade mark – Use of a trade mark to indicate the intended purpose of a product or service – Directive (EU) 2015/2436 – Article 14(1)(c).#Case C-361/22.cjeu_case · 11 января 2024 г.
14002Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 January 2024.#Industria de Diseño Textil, SA (Inditex) v Buongiorno Myalert SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive 2008/95/EC – Article 6(1)(c) – Limitation of the effects of the trade mark – Use of a trade mark to indicate the intended purpose of a product or service – Directive (EU) 2015/2436 – Article 14(1)(c).#Case C-361/22.cjeu_case · 11 января 2024 г.
14003Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 January 2024.#Friends of the Irish Environment CLG v Minister for Agriculture Food and the Marine and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common fisheries policy – Conservation of resources – Total allowable catches (TACs) applicable to stocks of cod in the West of Scotland and the Celtic Sea, whiting in the Irish Sea and plaice in the Celtic Sea South – Regulation (EU) 2020/123 – Regulation (EU) 2020/123 – Annex IA – TACs above zero – Expiry of the period of application – Assessment of validity – Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 – Article 2(2), second subparagraph – Objective of achieving a maximum sustainable yield (MSY) exploitation rate at the latest by 2020 for all stocks – Articles 2, 3, 9, 10, 15 and 16 – Socioeconomic and employment objectives – Best available scientific advice – Landing obligation – Mixed fisheries – ‘Choke species’ – Regulation (EU) 2019/472 – Articles 1 to 5, 8 and 10 – Target stocks – By-catches – Remedial measures – Discretion.#Case C-330/22.cjeu_case · 11 января 2024 г.
14004Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 January 2024.#Friends of the Irish Environment CLG v Minister for Agriculture Food and the Marine and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Irlande).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common fisheries policy – Conservation of resources – Total allowable catches (TACs) applicable to stocks of cod in the West of Scotland and the Celtic Sea, whiting in the Irish Sea and plaice in the Celtic Sea South – Regulation (EU) 2020/123 – Regulation (EU) 2020/123 – Annex IA – TACs above zero – Expiry of the period of application – Assessment of validity – Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 – Article 2(2), second subparagraph – Objective of achieving a maximum sustainable yield (MSY) exploitation rate at the latest by 2020 for all stocks – Articles 2, 3, 9, 10, 15 and 16 – Socioeconomic and employment objectives – Best available scientific advice – Landing obligation – Mixed fisheries – ‘Choke species’ – Regulation (EU) 2019/472 – Articles 1 to 5, 8 and 10 – Target stocks – By-catches – Remedial measures – Discretion.#Case C-330/22.cjeu_case · 11 января 2024 г.
14005Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 January 2024.#Societatea Civilă Profesională de Avocaţi AB & CD v Consiliul Judeţean Suceava and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Aarhus Convention – Article 9(3) to (5) – Access to justice – Law firm partnership – Action seeking to challenge administrative measures – Admissibility – Conditions laid down by national law – No impairment of a right or undermining of a legitimate interest – Not prohibitively expensive judicial proceedings – Allocation of costs – Criteria.#Case C-252/22.cjeu_case · 11 января 2024 г.
14006Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 January 2024.#Societatea Civilă Profesională de Avocaţi AB & CD v Consiliul Judeţean Suceava and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Târgu-Mureş.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Aarhus Convention – Article 9(3) to (5) – Access to justice – Law firm partnership – Action seeking to challenge administrative measures – Admissibility – Conditions laid down by national law – No impairment of a right or undermining of a legitimate interest – Not prohibitively expensive judicial proceedings – Allocation of costs – Criteria.#Case C-252/22.cjeu_case · 11 января 2024 г.
14007Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 January 2024.#État belge v Autorité de protection des données.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation) – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Point 7 of Article 4 – Concept of ‘controller’ – Official journal of a Member State – Obligation to publish as they stand company documents prepared by companies or their legal representatives – Article 5(2) – Successive processing of the personal data contained in such documents by several separate persons or entities – Determination of responsibilities.#Case C-231/22.cjeu_case · 11 января 2024 г.
14008Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 January 2024.#État belge v Autorité de protection des données.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the cour d'appel de Bruxelles.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation) – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Point 7 of Article 4 – Concept of ‘controller’ – Official journal of a Member State – Obligation to publish as they stand company documents prepared by companies or their legal representatives – Article 5(2) – Successive processing of the personal data contained in such documents by several separate persons or entities – Determination of responsibilities.#Case C-231/22.cjeu_case · 11 января 2024 г.
14009Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 January 2024.#Dyson Ltd and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Energy – Directive 2010/30/EU – Indication by labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy and other resources by energy-related products – Delegated regulation of the European Commission supplementing that directive – Energy labelling of vacuum cleaners – Annulment – Actions for damages – Non-contractual liability of the European Union – Requirement of a sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Manifest and grave disregard for the limits of discretion – Relevant factors in the case of the absence of any discretion.#Case C-122/22 P.cjeu_case · 11 января 2024 г.
14010Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 January 2024.#Dyson Ltd and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Energy – Directive 2010/30/EU – Indication by labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy and other resources by energy-related products – Delegated regulation of the European Commission supplementing that directive – Energy labelling of vacuum cleaners – Annulment – Actions for damages – Non-contractual liability of the European Union – Requirement of a sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Manifest and grave disregard for the limits of discretion – Relevant factors in the case of the absence of any discretion.#Case C-122/22 P.cjeu_case · 11 января 2024 г.
14011Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 January 2024.#Helene Hamers v European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop).#Appeal – Civil service – Official – Investigation by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) – National criminal proceedings – National decision to acquit the appellant – Damage allegedly sustained as a result of the unlawful conduct of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) during the national criminal proceedings – Rejection of the claim for damages brought by the appellant – Action for annulment and for damages – Article 41(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Requirement of impartiality – Conflict of interests – Article 48(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Presumption of innocence – Principle of sincere cooperation – Annulment of the contested decision in part.#Case C-111/22 P.cjeu_case · 11 января 2024 г.
14012Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 January 2024.#Helene Hamers v European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop).#Appeal – Civil service – Official – Investigation by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) – National criminal proceedings – National decision to acquit the appellant – Damage allegedly sustained as a result of the unlawful conduct of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) during the national criminal proceedings – Rejection of the claim for damages brought by the appellant – Action for annulment and for damages – Article 41(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Requirement of impartiality – Conflict of interests – Article 48(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Presumption of innocence – Principle of sincere cooperation – Annulment of the contested decision in part.#Case C-111/22 P.cjeu_case · 11 января 2024 г.
14013Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 11 January 2024.#Airbnb Ireland UC and Amazon Services Europe Sàrl v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom to provide services – Providers of information society services – Obligation to be entered in the register of communications operators – Obligation to provide information on structure and organisation – Obligation to make a financial contribution – Directive 2000/31/EC – Coordinated field – Principle of control in the home Member State – Exemptions – Concept of measures ‘taken against a given information society service’ – Regulation (EU) 2019/1150 – Objective.#Joined Cases C-662/22 and C-667/22.#Expedia Inc. v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) 2019/1150 – Articles 1, 15, 16 and 18 – Objective – Application – Monitoring – Review – Measures adopted by a Member State – Obligation to provide information on the economic situation of a provider of online intermediation services.#Case C-663/22.#Google Ireland Ltd and Eg Vacation Rentals Ireland Ltd v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom to provide services – Providers of information society services – Obligation to be entered in the register of communication operators – Obligation to provide information on structure and organisation – Obligation to pay a financial contribution – Directive 2000/31/EC – Coordinated field – Principle of control in the home Member State – Exemptions – Concept of measures ‘taken against a given information society service’ – Regulation (EU) 2019/1150 – Objective.#Joined Cases C-664/22 and C-666/22.#Amazon Services Europe Sàrl v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom to provide services – Providers of information society services – Obligation to provide information on the economic situation of a provider of online intermediation services – Directive 2000/31/EC – Coordinated field – Principle of control in the home Member State – Exemptions – Concept of measures ‘taken against a given information society service’ – Regulation (EU) 2019/1150 – Objective.#Case C-665/22.cjeu_case · 11 января 2024 г.
14014Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 11 January 2024.#AB Volvo v Transsaqui S.L.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 – Service of judicial and extrajudicial documents – Action for compensation for damage caused by a practice prohibited by Article 101(1) TFEU and by Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area – Document instituting proceedings served at the seat of a subsidiary of the defendant – Validity of the writ of summons – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Right to effective judicial protection.#Case C-632/22.cjeu_case · 11 января 2024 г.
14015Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 11 January 2024.#BP France SAS v Ministre de l’Économie, des Finances et de la Souveraineté industrielle et numérique.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'état (France).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources – Directive 2009/28/EC – Articles 17 and 18 – Directive 2018/2001/EC – Articles 25, 29 and 30 – Sustainability and greenhouse gas emissions saving criteria – Verification of compliance with those criteria – Biofuels used for transport – Production of fuels using the co-processing procedure – Evidence of compliance with those sustainability criteria – Mass balance method – Methods for evaluating the content of hydrotreated vegetable oils (HVO) in fuels produced using that procedure – Member State’s legislation requiring a physical carbon-14 analysis – Article 34 TFEU – Free movement of goods.#Case C-624/22.cjeu_case · 11 января 2024 г.
14016Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 11 January 2024.#SN and LN v Zamestnik-predsedatel na Darzhavna agentsia za bezhantsite.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 12 – Exclusion from being a refugee – Person registered with the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (for Palestine Refugees in the Near East) (UNRWA) – Conditions for that person to be entitled ipso facto to the benefits of Directive 2011/95/EU – Cessation of UNRWA’s protection or assistance – Article 4 – General situation prevailing in a sector of UNRWA’s area of operations – Individual assessment of relevant elements – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 40 – Subsequent application for international protection – New elements – Elements already examined in the final decision on the previous application.#Case C-563/22.cjeu_case · 11 января 2024 г.
14017Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 11 January 2024.#Google LLC and Alphabet Inc. v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Markets for online general search services and specialised product search services – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA) – Leveraging abuse – Competition on the merits or anticompetitive practice – Dominant undertaking favouring the display of results from its own specialised search service – Potential anticompetitive effects – Causal link between abuse and effects – Burden of proof – Counterfactual scenario – Capability of foreclosing – ‘As-efficient competitor’ test.#Case C-48/22 P.cjeu_case · 11 января 2024 г.
14018Case C-523/22, Apelativen sad Veliko Tarnovo: Order of the President of the Court of 11 January 2024 – (request for a preliminary ruling from the Apelativen sad Veliko Tarnovo – Bulgaria) – Criminal proceedings against UTcjeu_case · 11 января 2024 г.
14019Case C-755/22, Nárokuj: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 January 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresní soud Praha-západ — Czech Republic) — Nárokuj s.r.o. v EC Financial Services, a.s. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 2008/48/EC — Credit agreements for consumers — Article 8 — Obligation of a creditor to check a consumer’s creditworthiness — Regularisation of a breach due to full performance of the credit agreement — Article 23 — Effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties — Credit agreement void and creditor’s entitlement to payment of the agreed interest forfeited — No harmful consequences for the consumer — Holding creditors accountable and preventing irresponsible practices when granting credit to consumers)cjeu_case · 11 января 2024 г.
14020Case C-537/22, Global Ink Trade: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 January 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék — Hungary) — Global Ink Trade Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Refusal of the right to deduct — Obligations of the taxable person — Duty of diligence — Burden of proof — Principles of fiscal neutrality and legal certainty — Primacy of EU law — Conflict between the case-law of a national court and EU law)cjeu_case · 11 января 2024 г.