Каталог правовых документов

104314 документа
1361

Case T-269/25: Order of the General Court of 25 March 2026 – Mozer Belux v Parliament (Action for annulment – Public procurement – Public service contracts – Tendering procedure – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid – Award of the contract to another tenderer – Acts not open to challenge – Acts forming part of a purely contractual context from which they are not separable – Inadmissibility – Replacement of the contested act – No longer any interest in bringing proceedings – No need to adjudicate – Modification of the application– Failure to observe the time limit for instituting proceedings)

cjeu_case ·
1365

Case T-296/25, Lidikar: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, sitting with five Judges) of 25 March 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad – Bulgaria) – Direktor na TD Mitnitsa Burgas v Lidikar OOD (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Union Customs Code – Import and export procedures – Importation of goods from Canada – Method of determining the customs value – Declared export price of the goods communicated by the Canadian authorities under an international customs cooperation agreement – Concept of data available in the customs territory of the Union – Reasonable means – Article 74(3) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Residual or fall-back method – Article 144 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447)

cjeu_case ·
1366

Case T-221/25, TUI Belgium: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, sitting with five Judges) of 25 March 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie – Belgium) – TUI Belgium NV, TUI Belgium Retail NV, TUI Airlines Belgium NV, TUIFLY Academy Brussels NV, Tec4Jets NV, Pats NV, TUI Travel Belgium NV, TUI Technology NV, TUI Belgian Real Estate NV and BTW-eenheid Travel4You v Belgische Staat (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of VAT – Transactions subject to VAT – Supply of services for consideration – Exemptions – Standstill clause – Right of Member States to retain certain taxes during a transitional period – Article 28(3)(a) and (4) of Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC and Article 370 of Directive 2006/112/EC – Supply of services by travel agents in relation to travel outside the European Union – Annex E(15) to Sixth Directive 77/388 and Annex X, Part A, point (4), to Directive 2006/112 – Subsequent amendment of the national legislation – No express derogation from the exemption)

cjeu_case ·
1367

Case T-17/25: Judgment of the General Court of 25 March 2026 – Team Beverage v EUIPO – Zurich Deutscher Herold Lebensversicherung (TEAM BEVERAGE) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – EU figurative mark TEAM BEVERAGE – Earlier EU word mark TEAM – Request for suspension of the administrative proceedings – Rejection – Article 71(1)(a) and (b) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
1368

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 March 2026.#T. sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Katowicach.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Directive 2003/96/EC – Taxation of energy products and electricity – Article 21(5) – Excise duties collected by a Member State in breach of EU law – The electricity producer’s right to reimbursement of the amount overpaid – Case-law practice making the right to reimbursement conditional upon proof of financial loss – Unjust enrichment – Principle of the effectiveness of EU law.#Case C-593/25.

cjeu_case ·
1371

Case C-593/25, Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Katowicach: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 March 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny – Poland) – T. sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Katowicach (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Directive 2003/96/EC – Taxation of energy products and electricity – Article 21(5) – Excise duties collected by a Member State in breach of EU law – The electricity producer’s right to reimbursement of the amount overpaid – Case-law practice making the right to reimbursement conditional upon proof of financial loss – Unjust enrichment – Principle of the effectiveness of EU law)

cjeu_case ·
1372

Case C-181/25, Assessorato regionale della Salute: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 March 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di giustizia amministrativa per la Regione siciliana – Italy) – Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM) v Assessorato Regionale della Salute (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Requirement to provide reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
1373

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 25 March 2026.#Implementing Technologies, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark OSSA – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Relevant period – Assessment of the evidence – Exclusive licence agreement – No proof of use in respect of the goods for which the mark is registered – No proper reason for non-use.#Case T-545/24.

cjeu_case ·
1375

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 25 March 2026.#Implementing Technologies, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark OSSA SINCE 1940 – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Relevant period – Assessment of the evidence – Exclusive licence agreement – No proof of use in respect of the goods for which the mark is registered – No proper reason for non-use.#Case T-544/24.

cjeu_case ·
1379

Case T-545/24: Judgment of the General Court of 25 March 2026 – Implementing Technologies v EUIPO – M2Linx Design (OSSA) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark OSSA – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Relevant period – Assessment of the evidence – Exclusive licence agreement – No proof of genuine use in respect of the goods for which the mark is registered – No proper reason for non-use)

cjeu_case ·
1380

Case T-544/24: Judgment of the General Court of 25 March 2026 – Implementing Technologies v EUIPO – M2Linx Design (OSSA SINCE 1940) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark OSSA SINCE 1940 – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Relevant period – Assessment of the evidence – Exclusive licence agreement – No proof of genuine use in respect of the goods for which the mark is registered – No proper reason for non-use)

cjeu_case ·