13581Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 February 2024.#Proceedings brought by Profi Credit Bulgaria EOOD and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 6(1) – Article 7(1) – Ex officio review – Unfair terms – Application for an order for payment – Individual specification of amounts claimed – Instructions of the higher court in relation to the issue of an order for payment – Obligation on the lower court to comply with those instructions.#Case C-425/23.cjeu_case · 6 февраля 2024 г.
13582Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 February 2024.#Proceedings brought by Profi Credit Bulgaria EOOD and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 6(1) – Article 7(1) – Ex officio review – Unfair terms – Application for an order for payment – Individual specification of amounts claimed – Instructions of the higher court in relation to the issue of an order for payment – Obligation on the lower court to comply with those instructions.#Case C-425/23.cjeu_case · 6 февраля 2024 г.
13583Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 February 2024.#MB v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Vehicle tax – Second-hand vehicles from other Member States – Percentage reductions linked to depreciation – Calculation on the basis of a cubic capacity component and an environmental component – Application of different reduction percentages to each component of the tax.#Case C-399/23.cjeu_case · 6 февраля 2024 г.
13584Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 February 2024.#MB v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa - CAAD).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Vehicle tax – Second-hand vehicles from other Member States – Percentage reductions linked to depreciation – Calculation on the basis of a cubic capacity component and an environmental component – Application of different reduction percentages to each component of the tax.#Case C-399/23.cjeu_case · 6 февраля 2024 г.
13585Case C-616/23, British Airways: Order of the President of the Court of 6 February 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Düsseldorf – Germany) – TA, ET, VB, CI v British Airways plccjeu_case · 6 февраля 2024 г.
13586Case C-425/23, City Cash and Others: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 February 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad – Bulgaria) – Proceedings brought by ʻProfi Credit Bulgariaʼ EOOD, ʻAgentsia za sabirane na vzemaniaʼ EAD, ʻCity Cashʼ OOD (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 6(1) – Article 7(1) – Ex officio review – Unfair terms – Application for an order for payment – Individual specification of amounts claimed – Instructions of the higher court in relation to the issue of an order for payment – Obligation on the lower court to comply with those instructions)cjeu_case · 6 февраля 2024 г.
13587Case C-399/23, Osóquim: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 February 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) — Portugal) — MB v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court's existing case-law — Vehicle tax — Second-hand vehicles from other Member States — Percentage reductions linked to depreciation — Calculation on the basis of a cubic capacity component and an environmental component — Application of different reduction percentages to each component of the tax)cjeu_case · 6 февраля 2024 г.
13588Case C-117/22, BMW Bank and Others: Order of the President of the Court of 6 February 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof – Germany) – RS, PF, AM, PC, DF v BMW Bank GmbH, Mercedes-Benz Bank AG, Volkswagen Bank GmbH, Seat Bank, a branch of Volkswagen Bank GmbH (Removal from the register)cjeu_case · 6 февраля 2024 г.
13589Case T-711/21: Order of the General Court of 6 February 2024 — ID and Others v Parliamentcjeu_case · 6 февраля 2024 г.
13590Case T-57/24: Action brought on 5 February 2024 — Coöperatieve Rabobank v Commissioncjeu_case · 5 февраля 2024 г.
13591Case T-56/24: Action brought on 5 February 2024 — Birių Krovinių Terminalas v EUIPO — Btk Befrachtungs-und Transportkontor (BKT)cjeu_case · 5 февраля 2024 г.
13592Case T-55/24: Action brought on 5 February 2024 — Meta Platforms Ireland v Commissioncjeu_case · 5 февраля 2024 г.
13593Case T-54/24: Action brought on 5 February 2024 — EveMotion v EUIPO — Wmk Trading (Pavilions)cjeu_case · 5 февраля 2024 г.
13594Case T-53/24: Action brought on 5 February 2024 — Schmidt Spiele v EUIPO — de Gea Quintana (DDG)cjeu_case · 5 февраля 2024 г.
13595Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 February 2024.#DC v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Tax inspection procedure – Sale of second-hand vehicles to final consumers – Transactions subject to VAT – Articles 73 and 78 – Taxable base – Principle of fiscal neutrality – Incorrect charging of zero-rate VAT – Application of the standard rate of VAT by the tax authority – Inclusion of the VAT due in the sale price.#Case C-377/23.cjeu_case · 5 февраля 2024 г.
13596Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 February 2024.#DC v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Tax inspection procedure – Sale of second-hand vehicles to final consumers – Transactions subject to VAT – Articles 73 and 78 – Taxable base – Principle of fiscal neutrality – Incorrect charging of zero-rate VAT – Application of the standard rate of VAT by the tax authority – Inclusion of the VAT due in the sale price.#Case C-377/23.cjeu_case · 5 февраля 2024 г.
13597Case C-377/23, Sancra: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 February 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Portugal) — DC v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Tax inspection procedure — Sale of second-hand vehicles to final consumers — Transactions subject to VAT — Articles 73 and 78 — Taxable base — Principle of fiscal neutrality — Incorrect charging of zero-rate VAT — Application of the standard rate of VAT by the tax authority — Inclusion of the VAT due in the sale price)cjeu_case · 5 февраля 2024 г.
13598Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 February 2024.#Carlos Miguel Ferreira de Macedo Silva v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Frontex staff – Dismissal before the end of the probationary period – Obvious inadequacy – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-595/22.cjeu_case · 5 февраля 2024 г.
13599Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 February 2024.#Carlos Miguel Ferreira de Macedo Silva v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Frontex staff – Dismissal before the end of the probationary period – Obvious inadequacy – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-595/22.cjeu_case · 5 февраля 2024 г.
13600Case T-595/22: Order of the General Court of 5 February 2024 — Ferreira de Macedo Silva v Frontex (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Frontex staff — Dismissal before the end of the probationary period — Obvious inadequacy — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)cjeu_case · 5 февраля 2024 г.