Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
13561

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 7 February 2024.#Alisher Usmanov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Meaning of ‘supporting actions or policies which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine’ – Article 2(1)(a) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Rights of the defence – Right to property and freedom to conduct a business – Freedom of movement.#Case T-237/22.

cjeu_case ·
13562

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 February 2024.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Aid granted by the Netherlands to KLM in the context of the COVID‑19 pandemic – State guarantee for a bank loan and a subordinated loan by the State – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Substantial adverse effect on the applicant’s position on the market – Admissibility – Determination of the beneficiary of the aid in the context of a group of companies.#Case T-146/22.

cjeu_case ·
13563

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 February 2024.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Aid granted by the Netherlands to KLM in the context of the COVID‑19 pandemic – State guarantee for a bank loan and a subordinated loan by the State – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Substantial adverse effect on the applicant’s position on the market – Admissibility – Determination of the beneficiary of the aid in the context of a group of companies.#Case T-146/22.

cjeu_case ·
13570

Case T-289/22: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2024 — Shuvalov v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Status of natural person supporting actions or policies which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine — Article 2(1)(a) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP — Obligation to state reasons — Error of assessment — Freedom of expression — Equal treatment — Proportionality — Right to property — Right to effective judicial protection — Misuse of powers)

cjeu_case ·
13571

Case T-237/22: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2024 — Usmanov v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States — Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists — Meaning of ‘supporting actions or policies which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine’ — Article 2(1)(a) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP — Article 3(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 — Jurisdiction of the General Court — Obligation to state reasons — Error of assessment — Rights of the defence — Right to property and freedom to conduct a business — Freedom of movement)

cjeu_case ·
13572

Case T-146/22: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2024 — Ryanair v Commission (KLM II; COVID-19) (State aid — Aid granted by the Netherlands to KLM in the context of the COVID 19 pandemic — State guarantee for a bank loan and a subordinated loan by the State — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market — Action for annulment — Locus standi — Substantial adverse effect on the applicant’s position on the market — Admissibility — Determination of the beneficiary of the aid in the context of a group of companies)

cjeu_case ·
13579

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 February 2024.#AL v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Official – Remuneration – Investigation of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) – Family allowances – Dependent child allowances – Article 2(4) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Person treated as a dependent child – Person whom the official has a legal responsibility to maintain and whose maintenance involves heavy expenditure – Conditions for granting – Withdrawal of entitlement to the allowance – Recovery of overpaid sums under Article 85 of the Staff Regulations – Action for annulment – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-498/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
13580

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 February 2024.#AL v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Official – Remuneration – Investigation of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) – Family allowances – Dependent child allowances – Article 2(4) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Person treated as a dependent child – Person whom the official has a legal responsibility to maintain and whose maintenance involves heavy expenditure – Conditions for granting – Withdrawal of entitlement to the allowance – Recovery of overpaid sums under Article 85 of the Staff Regulations – Action for annulment – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-498/23 P.

cjeu_case ·