13501Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 February 2024.#European External Action Service v WV.#Taxation of costs.#Case C-171/20 P-DEP.cjeu_case · 8 февраля 2024 г.
13502Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 February 2024.#European External Action Service v WV.#Taxation of costs.#Case C-171/20 P-DEP.cjeu_case · 8 февраля 2024 г.
13503Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 February 2024.#WV v European External Action Service.#Taxation of costs.#Case C-162/20 P-DEP.cjeu_case · 8 февраля 2024 г.
13504Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 February 2024.#WV v European External Action Service.#Taxation of costs.#Case C-162/20 P-DEP.cjeu_case · 8 февраля 2024 г.
13505Case T-59/24: Action brought on 7 February 2024 — BBF Company v EUIPO — Monster Energy (INSOMNIA ENERGY)cjeu_case · 7 февраля 2024 г.
13506Case C-103/24, Zastępca Rzecznika Dyscyplinarnego: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Poland) lodged on 7 February 2024 – X.Y.cjeu_case · 7 февраля 2024 г.
13507Case C-102/24 P: Appeal brought on 7 February 2024 by Transport Werk GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 20 December 2023 in Case T-779/22, Transport Werk GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Officecjeu_case · 7 февраля 2024 г.
13508Case C-101/24, Finanzamt Hamburg-Altona: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 7 February 2024 – Finanzamt Hamburg-Altona v XYRALITY GmbHcjeu_case · 7 февраля 2024 г.
13509Case C-100/24, bonprix: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 7 February 2024 – Verbraucherzentrale Hamburg e. V. v bonprix Handelsgesellschaft mbHcjeu_case · 7 февраля 2024 г.
13510Case C-99/24, Chmieka: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Koszalinie (Poland) lodged on 7 February 2024 – G.M.K.-Z.B.M. v S.O.cjeu_case · 7 февраля 2024 г.
13511Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 February 2024.#Zakłady Farmaceutyczne Polpharma S.A. v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Medicinal products for human use – Marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Dimethyl fumarate Polpharma – dimethyl fumarate – Letter of the Commission drawing conclusions from a judgment of the Court of Justice – Measure not actionable – Inadmissibility – Hypothetical acts – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-228/23.cjeu_case · 7 февраля 2024 г.
13512Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 February 2024.#Zakłady Farmaceutyczne Polpharma S.A. v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Medicinal products for human use – Marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Dimethyl fumarate Polpharma – dimethyl fumarate – Letter of the Commission drawing conclusions from a judgment of the Court of Justice – Measure not actionable – Inadmissibility – Hypothetical acts – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-228/23.cjeu_case · 7 февраля 2024 г.
13513Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 February 2024.#Mylan Ireland Ltd v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Medicinal products for human use – Marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Dimethyl fumarate Mylan – dimethyl fumarate – Letter of the Commission drawing conclusions from a judgment of the Court of Justice – Measure not actionable – Inadmissibility – Hypothetical acts – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-227/23.cjeu_case · 7 февраля 2024 г.
13514Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 February 2024.#Mylan Ireland Ltd v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Medicinal products for human use – Marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Dimethyl fumarate Mylan – dimethyl fumarate – Letter of the Commission drawing conclusions from a judgment of the Court of Justice – Measure not actionable – Inadmissibility – Hypothetical acts – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-227/23.cjeu_case · 7 февраля 2024 г.
13515Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 February 2024.#Neuraxpharm Pharmaceuticals SL v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Medicinal products for human use – Marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Dimethyl fumarate Neuraxpharm – dimethyl fumarate – Letter of the Commission drawing conclusions from a judgment of the Court of Justice – Measure not actionable – Inadmissibility – Hypothetical acts – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-226/23.cjeu_case · 7 февраля 2024 г.
13516Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 February 2024.#Neuraxpharm Pharmaceuticals SL v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Medicinal products for human use – Marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Dimethyl fumarate Neuraxpharm – dimethyl fumarate – Letter of the Commission drawing conclusions from a judgment of the Court of Justice – Measure not actionable – Inadmissibility – Hypothetical acts – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-226/23.cjeu_case · 7 февраля 2024 г.
13517Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 February 2024.#J&B Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark J&B BRO – Earlier EU figurative marks 4BRO – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-318/23.cjeu_case · 7 февраля 2024 г.
13518Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 February 2024.#J&B Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark J&B BRO – Earlier EU figurative marks 4BRO – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-318/23.cjeu_case · 7 февраля 2024 г.
13519Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 7 February 2024.#Weinart Handelsgesellschaft mbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark KABI – Earlier EU figurative mark Kabir DONNAFUGATA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-302/23.cjeu_case · 7 февраля 2024 г.
13520Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 7 February 2024.#Weinart Handelsgesellschaft mbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark KABI – Earlier EU figurative mark Kabir DONNAFUGATA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-302/23.cjeu_case · 7 февраля 2024 г.