Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
13281

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 February 2024.#Ente Cambiano società cooperativa per azioni v Agenzia delle Entrate.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 63 TFEU – Free movement of capital – Directive 2008/7/EC – Cooperative credit banks having net assets above a certain threshold – National legislation obliging those banks to pay an amount equal to 20 % of those net assets in order to transfer their banking business to a public limited company in exchange for securities of that company – Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to provide reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court – Purely internal situation – Inadmissibility.#Case C-660/22.

cjeu_case ·
13282

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 February 2024.#XXX v Randstad Empleo ETT, SAU and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive No 2008/104/EC – Temporary agency work – Article 5(1) – Principle of equal treatment – Article 3(1)(f) – Concept of ‘basic working and employment conditions applicable to temporary agency workers’ – Concept of ‘pay’ – Compensation payable in respect of the total permanent incapacity of a temporary agency worker to carry out his or her usual occupation as a result of an accident at work which occurred during his or her assignment.#Case C-649/22.

cjeu_case ·
13283

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 February 2024.#XXX v Randstad Empleo ETT, SAU and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia del País Vasco.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive No 2008/104/EC – Temporary agency work – Article 5(1) – Principle of equal treatment – Article 3(1)(f) – Concept of ‘basic working and employment conditions applicable to temporary agency workers’ – Concept of ‘pay’ – Compensation payable in respect of the total permanent incapacity of a temporary agency worker to carry out his or her usual occupation as a result of an accident at work which occurred during his or her assignment.#Case C-649/22.

cjeu_case ·
13284

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 February 2024.#J.L.O.G. and J.J.O.P. v Resorts Mallorca Hotels International SL.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Collective redundancies – Directive No 98/59/EC – Paragraph 2(1) – Point at which the obligation to provide information and hold consultations arises – Number of actual or projected redundancies – Article 1(1) – Voluntary terminations of employment contracts before redundancies – Method for calculating the number of redundancies.#Case C-589/22.

cjeu_case ·
13285

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 February 2024.#J.L.O.G. and J.J.O.P. v Resorts Mallorca Hotels International SL.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de las Islas Baleares.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Collective redundancies – Directive No 98/59/EC – Paragraph 2(1) – Point at which the obligation to provide information and hold consultations arises – Number of actual or projected redundancies – Article 1(1) – Voluntary terminations of employment contracts before redundancies – Method for calculating the number of redundancies.#Case C-589/22.

cjeu_case ·
13286

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 February 2024.#Anklagemyndigheden v PO and Moesgaard Meat 2012 A/S.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 2010/75/EU – Integrated pollution prevention and control – Article 10 – Annex I, point 6.4(a) – Operating slaughterhouses with a carcass production capacity greater than 50 tonnes per day – Concepts of ‘carcass’ and ‘production capacity per day’ – Slaughterhouse without a permit – Actual production must be taken into account.#Case C-311/22.

cjeu_case ·
13287

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 February 2024.#Anklagemyndigheden v PO and Moesgaard Meat 2012 A/S.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Højesteret.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 2010/75/EU – Integrated pollution prevention and control – Article 10 – Annex I, point 6.4(a) – Operating slaughterhouses with a carcass production capacity greater than 50 tonnes per day – Concepts of ‘carcass’ and ‘production capacity per day’ – Slaughterhouse without a permit – Actual production must be taken into account.#Case C-311/22.

cjeu_case ·
13288

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 February 2024.#MP and Others v Consejería de Presidencia, Justicia e Interior de la Comunidad de Madrid and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Fixed-term employment contracts in the public sector – Staff having non-permanent contracts of indefinite duration – Clauses 2 and 3 – Scope – Concept of ‘fixed-term worker’ – Clause 5 – Measures to prevent and penalise the abuse of successive fixed-term employment contracts or relationships – Equivalent legal measures.#Joined Cases C-59/22, C-110/22 and C-159/22.

cjeu_case ·
13289

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 February 2024.#MP and Others v Consejería de Presidencia, Justicia e Interior de la Comunidad de Madrid and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Madrid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Fixed-term employment contracts in the public sector – Staff having non-permanent contracts of indefinite duration – Clauses 2 and 3 – Scope – Concept of ‘fixed-term worker’ – Clause 5 – Measures to prevent and penalise the abuse of successive fixed-term employment contracts or relationships – Equivalent legal measures.#Joined Cases C-59/22, C-110/22 and C-159/22.

cjeu_case ·
13290

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 February 2024.#Romania v European Commission.#Appeal – Law governing the institutions – European Citizens’ Initiative – Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 – Registration of a proposed citizens’ initiative – Article 4(2)(b) – Proposed citizens’ initiative not falling manifestly outside the framework of the European Commission’s powers to submit a proposal for a legal act of the European Union for the purpose of implementing the Treaties – Burden of proof – Power of the Commission to proceed with partial registration.#Case C-54/22 P.

cjeu_case ·
13291

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 February 2024.#Romania v European Commission.#Appeal – Law governing the institutions – European Citizens’ Initiative – Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 – Registration of a proposed citizens’ initiative – Article 4(2)(b) – Proposed citizens’ initiative not falling manifestly outside the framework of the European Commission’s powers to submit a proposal for a legal act of the European Union for the purpose of implementing the Treaties – Burden of proof – Power of the Commission to proceed with partial registration.#Case C-54/22 P.

cjeu_case ·
13293

Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 22 February 2024.#Criminal proceedings against M.S. and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Słupsku.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive (EU) 2016/800 – Procedural safeguards for children who are suspects or accused persons in criminal proceedings – Scope – Article 2(3) – Persons who were children on the date on which criminal proceedings were initiated against them but who reach the age of 18 years during the proceedings – Article 4 – Right to information – Article 6 – Right of access to a lawyer – Article 18 – Right to legal aid – Article 19 – Remedies – Admissibility of evidence obtained in breach of procedural rights.#Case C-603/22.

cjeu_case ·
13294

Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 5 September 2024.#BSH Hausgeräte GmbH v Electrolux AB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea hovrätt, Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 4(1) – General jurisdiction – Article 24(4) – Exclusive jurisdiction – Jurisdiction in proceedings concerned with the registration or validity of patents – Infringement action – European patent validated in Member States and in a third State – Challenge to the validity of the patent raised as a defence – International jurisdiction of the court hearing the infringement action.#Case C-339/22.

cjeu_case ·
13295

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 22 February 2024.#QI v Santander Bank Polska S.A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy-Woli w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 2014/17/EU – Credit agreements for consumers relating to residential immovable property – Article 25(1) – Early repayment – Consumer’s right to a reduction in the total cost of the credit – Article 4(13) – Concept of ‘total cost of the credit to the consumer’ – Costs that are dependent on the duration of the contract – Commission for granting the credit payable when concluding the contract – Methodology for calculating the reduction.#Case C-76/22.

cjeu_case ·
13296

Case C-745/22,  Micreos Food Safety: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 February 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias – Greece) – Micreos Food Safety BV v Eniaios Foreas Elenchou Trofimon (EFET) (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Food safety – Specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin – Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 – Article 3(2) – Substance intended to remove surface contamination from products of animal origin – Definition – Contamination by the pathogenic bacterium Listeria monocytogenes – Substance intended to prevent surface contamination from products of animal origin and applied outside of slaughterhouses during the final stages of the production process – Placing on the market – Prior approval by the European Commission)

cjeu_case ·
13298

Case C-674/22,  Gemeente Dinkelland: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 February 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the rechtbank Gelderland – Netherlands) – Gemeente Dinkelland v Ontvanger van de Belastingdienst/Grote ondernemingen, kantoor Zwolle (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxes levied in breach of EU law – Obligation to refund value added tax (VAT) and to pay interest on that amount – Refund resulting from errors made in the taxable person’s accounts – Refund resulting from the retroactive amendment of the detailed rules for calculating the deductible VAT relating to the taxable person’s general costs)

cjeu_case ·
13299

Case C-661/22,  ABC Projektai: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 February 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas – Lithuania) – ‘ABC Projektai’ UAB, formerly ‘Bruc Bond’ UAB v Lietuvos bankas (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Payment services in the internal market – Directive (EU) 2015/2366 – Article 4(3) and (5) – Payment service or payment transaction – Directive 2009/110/EC – Article 2(2) – Issuance of electronic money – Holding of customer funds by a payment institution without a specific payment order – Classification)

cjeu_case ·
13300

Case C-660/22,  Ente Cambiano società cooperativa per azioni: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 February 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione – Italy) – Ente Cambiano società cooperativa per azioni v Agenzia delle Entrate (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 63 TFEU – Free movement of capital – Directive 2008/7/EC – Cooperative credit banks having net assets above a certain threshold – National legislation obliging those banks to pay an amount equal to 20% of those net assets in order to transfer their banking business to a public limited company in exchange for securities of that company – Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to provide reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court – Purely internal situation – Inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·