Каталог правовых документов

104314 документа
1184

Order of the Court of 14 April 2026.#Industria de Diseño Textil, SA v Ffauf Italia SpA.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request that an appeal be allowed to proceed failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-753/25 P.

cjeu_case ·
1185

Order of the Court of 14 April 2026.#Industria de Diseño Textil, SA v Ffauf Italia SpA.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request that an appeal be allowed to proceed failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-753/25 P.

cjeu_case ·
1186

Case C-867/25 P: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 14 April 2026 Appeal brought on 30 December 2025 by Homestar sp. z o.o. against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 29 October 2025 – T-611/24, Homestar v EUIPO – General Sanitary (THERMATEC) (Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed)

cjeu_case ·
1187

Case C-824/25 P: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 14 April 2026 Appeal brought on 12 December 2025 by Frutaria Innovation SL against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 October 2025 – T-381/24, Frutaria Innovation v EUIPO – Schneider (Frutaria) (Appeal–EU trade mark–Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed–Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice–Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law–Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed)

cjeu_case ·
1188

Case C-753/25 P: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 14 April 2026 Appeal brought on 21 November 2025 by Industria de Diseño Textil, SA against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2025 – T-425/24, Ffauf Italia v EUIPO (Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request that an appeal be allowed to proceed failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed)

cjeu_case ·
1189

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 April 2026.#TJ v Comunidad de Madrid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Fixed-term employment contracts in the public sector – Clause 5 – Measures to prevent and penalise the abuse of successive fixed-term employment contracts or relationships – Conversion of successive fixed-term contracts into a contract of indefinite duration – National legislation not permitting such conversion, but laying down other measures to prevent and penalise such abuse – Effective, dissuasive and proportionate penalty measures.#Case C-418/24.

cjeu_case ·
1190

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 April 2026.#TJ v Comunidad de Madrid.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Fixed-term employment contracts in the public sector – Clause 5 – Measures to prevent and penalise the abuse of successive fixed-term employment contracts or relationships – Conversion of successive fixed-term contracts into a contract of indefinite duration – National legislation not permitting such conversion, but laying down other measures to prevent and penalise such abuse – Effective, dissuasive and proportionate penalty measures.#Case C-418/24.

cjeu_case ·
1191

Case C-418/24, Obadal: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 April 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo – Spain) – TJ v Comunidad de Madrid (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Fixed-term employment contracts in the public sector – Clause 5 – Measures to prevent and penalise the abuse of successive fixed-term employment contracts or relationships – Conversion of successive fixed-term contracts into a contract of indefinite duration – National legislation not permitting such conversion, but laying down other measures to prevent and penalise such abuse – Effective, dissuasive and proportionate penalty measures)

cjeu_case ·
1192

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 April 2026.#CG and YN v Pelham GmbH and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Copyright and related rights – Directive 2001/29/EC – Information society – Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights – Article 2 – Reproduction right – Article 5 – Exceptions and limitations – Article 5(3)(k) – Concept of ‘pastiche’ – Use ‘for the purpose of’ pastiche – Reproduction of parts of a phonogram (sampling) – Fundamental rights – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 11 – Freedom of expression – Article 13 – Freedom of the arts – Article 17 – Right to property.#Case C-590/23.

cjeu_case ·
1193

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 April 2026.#CG and YN v Pelham GmbH and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Copyright and related rights – Directive 2001/29/EC – Information society – Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights – Article 2 – Reproduction right – Article 5 – Exceptions and limitations – Article 5(3)(k) – Concept of ‘pastiche’ – Use ‘for the purpose of’ pastiche – Reproduction of parts of a phonogram (sampling) – Fundamental rights – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 11 – Freedom of expression – Article 13 – Freedom of the arts – Article 17 – Right to property.#Case C-590/23.

cjeu_case ·
1194

Case C-590/23, Pelham (Concept of pastiche): Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 April 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof – Germany) – CG, YN v Pelham GmbH, SD, UP (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Copyright and related rights – Directive 2001/29/EC – Information society – Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights – Article 2 – Reproduction right – Article 5 – Exceptions and limitations – Article 5(3)(k) – Concept of pastiche – Use for the purpose of pastiche – Reproduction of parts of a phonogram (sampling) – Fundamental rights – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 11 – Freedom of expression – Article 13 – Freedom of the arts – Article 17 – Right to property)

cjeu_case ·
1197

Ordonnance de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 13 avril 2026.#Francesco Antonio Pinto contre Governo Italiano et Ministero della Giustizia.#Article 53, paragraphe 2, du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Recours en manquement formé par une personne physique contre des autorités d’un État membre – Recours en annulation introduit contre une décision d’une juridiction d’un État membre – Recours introduit par une personne physique tendant à faire constater la carence d’une autorité d’un État membre – Recours visant la réparation des dommages causés par des autorités d’un État membre – Incompétence manifeste de la Cour – Renvoi préjudiciel introduit par un particulier – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-681/25.

cjeu_case ·
1198

Case C-681/25, Pinto v Governo Italiano and Ministero della Giustizia: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 April 2026 – Francesco Antonio Pinto v Governo Italiano, Ministero della Giustizia (Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Action for failure to fulfil obligations brought by a natural person against the authorities of a Member State – Action to set aside a decision of a court of a Member State – Action brough by a natural person seeking a declaration that an authority of a Member State failed to act – Action seeking compensation for harm caused by the authorities of a Member State – Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court of Justice – Reference for a preliminary ruling made by an individual – Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·