11962Case T-264/24: Action brought on 17 May 2024 – Laboratorios Salvat v EUIPO – Acta Farma (Omycol)cjeu_case · 17 мая 2024 г.
11963Case T-263/24: Action brought on 17 May 2024 – Noster Finance v EUIPO – Wewi Mobile (finect)cjeu_case · 17 мая 2024 г.
11965Case T-261/24: Action brought on 17 May 2024 – Birių Krovinių Terminalas v Council and Commissioncjeu_case · 17 мая 2024 г.
11966Case C-364/24, Dalfardo: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 17 May 2024 – PH, on his own account and as owner of the agricultural holding In Trois v Ministero dell’Agricoltura, della Sovranità Alimentare e delle Forestecjeu_case · 17 мая 2024 г.
11967Case C-363/24, Finansinspektionen: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen (Sweden) lodged on 17 May 2024 – Finansinspektionen v Carnegie Investment Bank ABcjeu_case · 17 мая 2024 г.
11968Case C-361/24, Grecniaka: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 17 May 2024 – RX v FZ and VTcjeu_case · 17 мая 2024 г.
11969Case C-359/24: Action brought on 17 May 2024 – European Commission v Hellenic Republiccjeu_case · 17 мая 2024 г.
11970C-88/24, Bankinter Consumer Finance: Order of the President of the Court of 17 May 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia no 1 de Fuenlabrada – Spain) – A.B.D. v Bankinter Consumer Finance, E.F.C., S.A.cjeu_case · 17 мая 2024 г.
11971Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 May 2024.#Criminal proceedings against VGG AG and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to present the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Absence of sufficient information – Article 56 TFEU – Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons – Scope – Prohibition of restrictions on the cross-frontier provision of services not exceeding 90 days per calendar year – Provision of services in France for a period exceeding 90 days – Manifest inadmissibility – No situation of implementation of EU law – Manifest lack of jurisdiction.#Case C-190/23.cjeu_case · 17 мая 2024 г.
11972Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 May 2024.#Criminal proceedings against VGG AG and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the investigating judge at the tribunal judiciaire de Paris.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to present the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Absence of sufficient information – Article 56 TFEU – Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons – Scope – Prohibition of restrictions on the cross-frontier provision of services not exceeding 90 days per calendar year – Provision of services in France for a period exceeding 90 days – Manifest inadmissibility – No situation of implementation of EU law – Manifest lack of jurisdiction.#Case C-190/23.cjeu_case · 17 мая 2024 г.
11973Case C-190/23, VGG: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 May 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the investigating judge at the Tribunal Judiciaire de Paris – France) – criminal proceedings against VGG AG, VGG Entertainment Inc., Dan A., M. Trade SAS, D. SASU, T. Logistique SAS, Arthur C., S. SAS, Grégory B., David C., David M., IE, CID (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to present the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Absence of sufficient information – Article 56 TFEU – Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons – Scope – Prohibition of restrictions on the cross-frontier provision of services not exceeding 90 days per calendar year – Provision of services in France for a period exceeding 90 days – Manifest inadmissibility – No situation of implementation of EU law – Manifest lack of jurisdiction)cjeu_case · 17 мая 2024 г.
11974Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 May 2024.#Dimosia Epicheirisi Ilektrismou AE (DEI) v Mytilinaios AE – Omilos Epicheiriseon.#Taxation of costs.#Case C-332/18 P-DEP.cjeu_case · 17 мая 2024 г.
11975Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 May 2024.#Dimosia Epicheirisi Ilektrismou AE (DEI) v Mytilinaios AE – Omilos Epicheiriseon.#Taxation of costs.#Case C-332/18 P-DEP.cjeu_case · 17 мая 2024 г.
11976Case T-260/24: Action brought on 16 May 2024 – Apple and Apple Distribution International v Commissioncjeu_case · 16 мая 2024 г.
11977Case T-259/24: Action brought on 16 May 2024 – Kudsi Alattar v EUIPO – Medelhavet Gross (Chamain)cjeu_case · 16 мая 2024 г.
11978Case T-111/24: Order of the General Court of 16 May 2024 – Whitehorse Liquidity Partners v EUIPO – HIG Whitehorse Management (H.I.G. WHITEHORSE)cjeu_case · 16 мая 2024 г.
11979Case C-362/24 P: Appeal brought on 16 May 2024 by MHCS against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 6 March 2024 in Case T-652/22, Lidl Stiftung v EUIPO – MHCS (Shade of the Colour Orange)cjeu_case · 16 мая 2024 г.
11980Case C-358/24, Varo Energy Belgium and Others: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof (Belgium) lodged on 16 May 2024 – Varo Energy Belgium NV, EG Retail (Belgium) BV, Gilops Group NV, Van Raak Trading NV, Kuwait Petroleum (Belgium) NV v Ministerraad (Eerste Minister)cjeu_case · 16 мая 2024 г.