Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
11721

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 June 2024.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Article 107(3)(b) TFEU – Aid scheme notified by the Kingdom of Spain – Recapitalisation fund to support strategic undertakings amid the COVID-19 pandemic – Temporary Framework for State aid measures – Decision by the European Commission not to raise objections – Aid to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy – Principles of proportionality and non-discrimination – Freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services.#Case C-441/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
11722

Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 6 June 2024.#European Parliament v Axa Assurances Luxembourg SA and Others.#Appeal – Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – More than one defendant in the proceedings at first instance – Judgment in default against one of those defendants which is the subject of an application before the General Court of the European Union to have it set aside – Admissibility of the appeal brought against that judgment – Conditions – Article 41 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Admissibility of the response to an appeal submitted by a party against which an order was made by default at first instance – Article 172 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Cross-appeal brought by a party against which an order was made by default and which has made an application to set aside to the General Court – Article 176(1) and Article 178 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Inadmissibility – Arbitration clause – Article 272 TFEU – Insurance contract concluded by the European Parliament – Exclusion clause in respect of damage relating directly or indirectly to flooding – Scope.#Case C-766/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
11723

Case C-441/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 June 2024 – Ryanair DAC v European Commission, Kingdom of Spain, French Republic (Appeal – State aid – Article 107(3)(b) TFEU – Aid scheme notified by the Kingdom of Spain – Recapitalisation fund to support strategic undertakings amid the COVID-19 pandemic – Temporary Framework for State aid measures – Decision by the European Commission not to raise objections – Aid to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy – Principles of proportionality and non-discrimination – Freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services)

cjeu_case ·
11733

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 5 June 2024.#Hofstede Insights Oy v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark hofstede insights – Earlier national word mark and earlier national trade name HOFSTEDE INSIGHTS – Earlier national trade name and earlier national company name Hofstede Insights – Earlier national trade name and earlier national company name Hofstede Insights Group – Domain name ‘hofstede-insights.com’ – Domain name ‘hofstede-insights.net’ – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Grounds included for the sake of completeness – Plea in law ineffective.#Case T-429/23.

cjeu_case ·
11734

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 June 2024.#Habitat Barcelona Unión Constructora SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark ACOMODEO – Earlier national word mark ACOMODIS – Relative ground for invalidity – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 57(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 64(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-365/23.

cjeu_case ·
11735

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 June 2024.#Habitat Barcelona Unión Constructora SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark ACOMODEO – Earlier national word mark ACOMODIS – Relative ground for invalidity – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 57(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 64(2) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-365/23.

cjeu_case ·
11736

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 5 June 2024.#VA v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Remuneration – Family allowances – Dependent child allowance – Education allowance – Decisions to terminate certain allowances – Conditions for granting – Concept of ‘end of education’ – Equal treatment – Principle of sound administration – Recovery of undue payment – First paragraph of Article 85 of the Staff Regulations – Responsibility.#Case T-123/23.

cjeu_case ·
11737

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 5 June 2024.#VA v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Remuneration – Family allowances – Dependent child allowance – Education allowance – Decisions to terminate certain allowances – Conditions for granting – Concept of ‘end of education’ – Equal treatment – Principle of sound administration – Recovery of undue payment – First paragraph of Article 85 of the Staff Regulations – Responsibility.#Case T-123/23.

cjeu_case ·
11738

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 June 2024.#Supermac's (Holdings) Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark BIG MAC – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No proof of genuine use of the mark in connection with some of the goods and services – Lack of solid and objective evidence – No independent subcategory – Interpretation of the list of services.#Case T-58/23.

cjeu_case ·
11739

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 June 2024.#Supermac's (Holdings) Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark BIG MAC – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No proof of genuine use of the mark in connection with some of the goods and services – Lack of solid and objective evidence – No independent subcategory – Interpretation of the list of services.#Case T-58/23.

cjeu_case ·