Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
11521

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 June 2024.#European Commission v Single Resolution Board.#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Banking Union – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Single Resolution Mechanism – Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail – Article 18(7) – Adoption by the Single Resolution Board of a resolution scheme – Endorsement of that scheme by the European Commission – Article 86(2) – Act against which proceedings may be brought – Action for annulment – Admissibility.#Case C-551/22 P.

cjeu_case ·
11522

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 June 2024.#European Commission v Single Resolution Board (SRB).#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Banking Union – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Single resolution mechanism – Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail – Article 18(7) – Adoption by the Single Resolution Board of a resolution scheme – Endorsement of that scheme by the European Commission – Article 86(2) – Act against which proceedings may be brought – Action for annulment – Admissibility.#Case C-551/22 P.

cjeu_case ·
11523

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 June 2024.#Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Hamm v A.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 21(1) – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 9(2) and (3) – Definitive grant of refugee status by a Member State – Refugee residing in another Member State after that grant – Request for extradition submitted by the third State of origin of that refugee to the Member State of residence – Effect of the decision granting refugee status on the extradition procedure concerned – Article 18 and Article 19(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Protection of that refugee against the extradition sought.#Case C-352/22.

cjeu_case ·
11524

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 June 2024.#A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Hamm.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 21(1) – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 9(2) and (3) – Definitive grant of refugee status by a Member State – Refugee residing in another Member State after that grant – Request for extradition submitted by the third State of origin of that refugee to the Member State of residence – Effect of the decision granting refugee status on the extradition procedure concerned – Article 18 and Article 19(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Protection of that refugee against the extradition sought.#Case C-352/22.

cjeu_case ·
11525

Case C-753/22, Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Effect of a decision granting refugee status): Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 June 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht – Germany) – QY v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 33(2)(a) – No possibility for the authorities of a Member State to reject an application for asylum as inadmissible on the ground that refugee status was previously granted in another Member State – Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Risk of being subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment in that other Member State – Examination by those authorities of that application for asylum despite the granting of refugee status in that other Member State – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 4 – Individual examination)

cjeu_case ·
11526

Case C-551/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 June 2024 – European Commission v Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno, Stiftung für Forschung und Lehre (SFL), Single Resolution Board (SRB), Kingdom of Spain, European Parliament, Council of the European Union, Banco Santander SA (Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Banking Union – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Single resolution mechanism – Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail – Article 18(7) – Adoption by the Single Resolution Board of a resolution scheme – Endorsement of that scheme by the European Commission – Article 86(2) – Act against which proceedings may be brought – Action for annulment – Admissibility)

cjeu_case ·
11527

Case C-352/22, Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Hamm (Request for the extradition of a refugee to Türkiye): Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 June 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Hamm – Germany) – in the proceedings relating to the extradition of A. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 21(1) – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 9(2) and (3) – Definitive grant of refugee status by a Member State – Refugee residing in another Member State after that grant – Request for extradition submitted by the third State of origin of that refugee to the Member State of residence – Effect of the decision granting refugee status on the extradition procedure concerned – Article 18 and Article 19(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Protection of that refugee against the extradition sought)

cjeu_case ·
11529

Case C-424/24, FIGC and CONI: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 17 June 2024 – ZD v Federazione Italiana Giuoco Calcio (FIGC), Comitato Olimpico Nazionale Italiano (CONI), Procura federale presso la Federazione Italiana Giuoco Calcio (FIGC), Collegio di garanzia dello sport presso il Comitato Olimpico Nazionale Italiano (CONI), Corte federale d’appello presso la Federazione Italiana Giuoco Calcio (FIGC)

cjeu_case ·
11531

Case T-546/23: Order of the General Court of 17 June 2024 – WS v EDPS (Action for annulment and for damages – Law governing the institutions – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 – Rejection of the complaint to the EDPS concerning the processing of the applicant’s personal data – Revision of the contested decision – Partial disappearance of the subject matter of the dispute – No need to adjudicate in part – Action in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

cjeu_case ·
11532

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 June 2024.#QP v Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 95/46/EC – Processing of personal data in the context of enforcement proceedings – Requirement to present the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court and the link between the provisions of European Union law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-599/23.

cjeu_case ·
11533

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 June 2024.#QP v Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Aytos.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 95/46/EC – Processing of personal data in the context of enforcement proceedings – Requirement to present the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court and the link between the provisions of European Union law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-599/23.

cjeu_case ·
11534

Case C-599/23, Obshtina Burgas and Others: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 June 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Aytos – Bulgaria) – QP v Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite, Obshtina Burgas, Ministerstvo na pravosadieto (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 95/46/EC – Processing of personal data in the context of enforcement proceedings – Requirement to present the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court and the link between the provisions of European Union law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·