11261Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 3 July 2024.#EuroChem Group AG v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds and economic resources – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Reference to the applicant’s name in the grounds for including another person’s name on the list – No act adversely affecting the applicant – Inadmissibility.#Case T-293/23.cjeu_case · 3 июля 2024 г.
11262Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 3 July 2024.#United Company Rusal MKPAO (UC Rusal) v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds and economic resources – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Reference to the applicant’s name in the grounds for including another person’s name on the list – No act adversely affecting the applicant – Inadmissibility.#Case T-292/23.cjeu_case · 3 июля 2024 г.
11263Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 3 July 2024.#United Company Rusal MKPAO (UC Rusal) v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds and economic resources – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Reference to the applicant’s name in the grounds for including another person’s name on the list – No act adversely affecting the applicant – Inadmissibility.#Case T-292/23.cjeu_case · 3 июля 2024 г.
11264Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 3 July 2024.#AC Marca Brands, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-530/23.cjeu_case · 3 июля 2024 г.
11265Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 3 July 2024.#AC Marca Brands, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Sanitix – Earlier EU figurative mark SANYTOL – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Increased distinctiveness of the earlier mark.#Case T-358/23.cjeu_case · 3 июля 2024 г.
11266Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 3 July 2024.#AC Marca Brands, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark SANITIEN – Earlier EU figurative and word marks SANYTOL – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Increased distinctiveness of earlier marks.#Case T-345/23.cjeu_case · 3 июля 2024 г.
11267Case T-294/23: Order of the General Court of 3 July 2024 – Suek v Council (Action for annulment – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds and economic resources – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Reference to the applicant’s name in the grounds for including another person’s name on the list – No act adversely affecting the applicant – Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 3 июля 2024 г.
11268Case T-293/23: Order of the General Court of 3 July 2024 – EuroChem Group v Council (Action for annulment – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds and economic resources – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Reference to the applicant’s name in the grounds for including another person’s name on the list – No act adversely affecting the applicant – Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 3 июля 2024 г.
11269Case T-292/23: Order of the General Court of 3 July 2024 – UC Rusal v Council (Action for annulment – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds and economic resources – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Reference to the applicant’s name in the grounds for including another person’s name on the list – No act adversely affecting the applicant – Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 3 июля 2024 г.
11270Case T-530/23: Judgment of the General Court of 3 July 2024 – AC Marca Brands v EUIPO – Teb Barcelona (saniteb +) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark saniteb+ – Earlier EU word mark SANYTOL – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier mark)cjeu_case · 3 июля 2024 г.
11271Case T-358/23: Judgment of the General Court of 3 July 2024 – AC Marca Brands v EUIPO – Sanitix (Sanitix) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Sanitix – Earlier EU figurative mark SANYTOL – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Increased distinctiveness of the earlier mark)cjeu_case · 3 июля 2024 г.
11272Case T-345/23: Judgment of the General Court of 3 July 2024 – AC Marca Brands v EUIPO – den Ouden (SANITIEN) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark SANITIEN – Earlier EU figurative and word marks SANYTOL – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Increased distinctiveness of earlier marks)cjeu_case · 3 июля 2024 г.
11273Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 3 July 2024.#Dmitry Arkadievich Mazepin v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintaining the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘leading businessperson’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-742/22.cjeu_case · 3 июля 2024 г.
11274Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 3 July 2024.#Dmitry Arkadievich Mazepin v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintaining the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘leading businessperson’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-742/22.cjeu_case · 3 июля 2024 г.
11275Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 July 2024.#SBM Développement SAS v European Commission.#Biocidal products – Authorisation through mutual recognition – Biocidal product Pat’Appât Souricide Canadien Foudroyant – Commission decision on unresolved objections – Articles 35, 36 and 48 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Cancellation or amendment of marketing authorisations – Action for annulment – Direct concern – Individual concern – Admissibility – Conditions for granting an authorisation – Article 19(1) of Regulation No 528/2012 – Article 19(5) of Regulation No 528/2012 – Competence of the Commission – Concept of ‘national authorisation’ – Concept of ‘reference Member State’ – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-667/22.cjeu_case · 3 июля 2024 г.
11276Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 July 2024.#SBM Développement SAS v European Commission.#Biocidal products – Authorisation through mutual recognition – Biocidal product Pat’Appât Souricide Canadien Foudroyant – Commission decision on unresolved objections – Articles 35, 36 and 48 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Cancellation or amendment of marketing authorisations – Action for annulment – Direct concern – Individual concern – Admissibility – Conditions for granting an authorisation – Article 19(1) of Regulation No 528/2012 – Article 19(5) of Regulation No 528/2012 – Competence of the Commission – Concept of ‘national authorisation’ – Concept of ‘reference Member State’ – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-667/22.cjeu_case · 3 июля 2024 г.
11277Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 3 July 2024.#Sophienwald AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Sw Sophienwald – Absolute ground for invalidity – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) and Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-597/22.cjeu_case · 3 июля 2024 г.
11278Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 3 July 2024.#Sophienwald AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Sw Sophienwald – Absolute ground for invalidity – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) and Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-597/22.cjeu_case · 3 июля 2024 г.
11279Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 3 July 2024.#Volkskreditbank AG v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and Monetary Union – Banking Union – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the ex ante contributions for the 2022 contribution period – Determination of the annual target level of the SRF – Cap laid down in the first and fourth subparagraphs of Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Article 291(2) TFEU – Article 70(7) of Regulation No 806/2014 – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/81 – Implementing powers conferred on the Council – Duly justified specific cases – Scope of the implementing powers – Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment.#Case T-406/22.cjeu_case · 3 июля 2024 г.
11280Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 3 July 2024.#Volkskreditbank AG v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and Monetary Union – Banking Union – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the ex ante contributions for the 2022 contribution period – Determination of the annual target level of the SRF – Cap laid down in the first and fourth subparagraphs of Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Article 291(2) TFEU – Article 70(7) of Regulation No 806/2014 – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/81 – Implementing powers conferred on the Council – Duly justified specific cases – Scope of the implementing powers – Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment.#Case T-406/22.cjeu_case · 3 июля 2024 г.