Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
11222

Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 4 July 2024.#Mesto Rimavská Sobota v Ministerstvo pôdohospodárstva a rozvoja vidieka Slovenskej republiky.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší správny súd Slovenskej republiky.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Regulation (EU) No 995/2010 – Obligations of operators who place timber and timber products on the market – Article 2(a) to (c) – Concepts of ‘timber and timber products’, ‘placing on the market’ and ‘operator’.#Case C-370/23.

cjeu_case ·
11223

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 4 July 2024.#Halmer Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft UG v Rechtsanwaltskammer München.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bayerischer Anwaltsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 49 TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Article 63 TFEU – Free movement of capital – Establishing the applicable freedom – Services in the internal market – Directive 2006/123/EC – Article 15 – Requirements which relate to the shareholding of a company – A purely financial investor’s holding in a law firm – Revocation of that law firm’s registration with the professional body on account of that holding – Restriction on freedom of establishment and on the free movement of capital – Justifications based on protecting the independence of lawyers and recipients of legal services – Necessity – Proportionality.#Case C-295/23.

cjeu_case ·
11224

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 4 July 2024.#E.P. v Ministarstvo financija Republike Hrvatske, Samostalni sektor za drugostupanjski upravni postupak.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Ustavni sud Republike Hrvatske.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – Article 21(1) TFEU – Right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States – Tax legislation – Income tax – Calculation of the amount of the basic personal allowance for a dependent child who has received mobility support for educational purposes in the context of the Erasmus+ programme – Regulation (EU) No 1288/2013 – Taxation of grants to support the mobility of individuals covered by that regulation – Restriction on freedom of movement – Proportionality.#Case C-277/23.

cjeu_case ·
11226

Case C-375/23, Meislev: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Højesteret – Denmark) – EN v Udlændingenævnet (Reference for a preliminary ruling – EEC-Turkey Association Agreement – Decision No 1/80 – Article 13 – Standstill clause – Scope – Concept of new restriction – National legislation introducing more restrictive conditions for obtaining a permanent residence permit)

cjeu_case ·
11227

CaseC-283/23, Marhon: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation – Belgium) – Criminal proceedings against FB, JL Sàrl (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Harmonisation of laws – Transport – Road transport – Directive 2014/31/EU – Scope – Non-automatic weighing instruments for the purpose of determining the mass of vehicles – Use of weighing instruments for the purposes of applying national criminal legislation)

cjeu_case ·
11228

Case C-179/23, Credidam: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție – Romania) – Centrul Român pentru Administrarea Drepturilor Artiștilor Interpreți (Credidam) v Guvernul României, Ministerul Finanțelor (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Taxable transactions – Supply of services for consideration – Management fees collected by a collective management organisation for copyright and related rights for the collection, distribution and payment of remuneration due to rightholders – Remuneration not forming part of a taxable transaction)

cjeu_case ·
11229

Case C-87/23, Latvijas Informācijas un komunikācijas tehnoloģijas asociācija: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā apgabaltiesa – Latvia) – Biedrība Latvijas Informācijas un komunikācijas tehnoloģijas asociācija v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 2(1)(c) – Supply of services for consideration – Article 9(1) – Concepts of taxable person and economic activity – Non-profit association carrying out projects financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) – Supply of training services through subcontractors – Inclusion of the amount of the subsidy in the taxable amount – Article 73)

cjeu_case ·
11230

Case C-70/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 July 2024 – Westfälische Drahtindustrie GmbH, Westfälische Drahtindustrie Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Pampus Industriebeteiligungen GmbH & Co. KG v European Commission (Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – European market for prestressing steel – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA) – Judgment annulling the decision in part and fixing a fine in an amount identical to the amount of the fine initially imposed – Application of payments made on a provisional basis – Decision of the European Commission on the outstanding balance of the fine – Due date for payment of a fine, the amount of which has been fixed by the EU judicature, in the exercise of its unlimited jurisdiction)

cjeu_case ·
11234

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 July 2024.#Portuguese Republic v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Madeira Free Zone – Granting of tax advantages to undertakings – Aid scheme implemented by the Portuguese Republic – Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final – Decision taken by the European Commission pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 108(2) TFEU – Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Article 1(b)(i) and (ii) – Definitions of ‘existing aid’ and ‘new aid’ – Implementation of existing aid in breach of a condition ensuring compatibility of the aid with the internal market.#Case C-736/22 P.

cjeu_case ·
11235

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 July 2024.#Portuguese Republic v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Madeira Free Zone – Granting of tax advantages to undertakings – Aid scheme implemented by the Portuguese Republic – Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final – Decision taken by the European Commission pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 108(2) TFEU – Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Article 1(b)(i) and (ii) – Definitions of ‘existing aid’ and ‘new aid’ – Implementation of existing aid in breach of a condition ensuring compatibility of the aid with the internal market.#Case C-736/22 P.

cjeu_case ·
11236

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 July 2024.#Asociación Española de Productores de Vacuno de Carne (Asoprovac) v Administración General del Estado.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the common agricultural policy – Financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy – Permanent public grassland – Conditions for access to direct payments for farmers – Animals must belong to the farmers’ own agricultural holding.#Case C-708/22.

cjeu_case ·
11237

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 July 2024.#Asociación Española de Productores de Vacuno de Carne (Asoprovac) v Administración General del Estado.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the common agricultural policy – Financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy – Permanent public grassland – Conditions for access to direct payments for farmers – Animals must belong to the farmers’ own agricultural holding.#Case C-708/22.

cjeu_case ·
11238

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 July 2024.#SB v Agrárminiszter.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common agricultural policy – Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Article 52 – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014 – Article 53(1) – Definition of eligibility criteria for coupled support measures – Competence of the Member States – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 640/2014 – Points 16 and 18 of the second subparagraph of Article 2(1) – Distinction between ‘declared animals’ and ‘animals determined’ – Article 30(3) – Support calculated on the basis of animals determined – Article 31(1) to (3) – Administrative penalties for non-compliance among declared animals – Application for coupled support linked to the keeping of suckler cows – Calving rate set in national regulations not reached by all declared animals – Rate achieved by a smaller number of those animals – National practice refusing support.#Case C-538/22.

cjeu_case ·
11239

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 July 2024.#SB v Agrárminiszter.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common Agricultural Policy – Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Article 52 – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014 – Article 53(1) – Definition of eligibility criteria for coupled support measures – Competence of the Member States – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 640/2014 – Points 16 and 18 of the second subparagraph of Article 2(1) – Distinction between ‘declared animals’ and ‘animals determined’ – Article 30(3) – Support calculated on the basis of animals determined – Article 31(1) to (3) – Administrative penalties for non-compliance among declared animals – Application for coupled support linked to the keeping of suckler cows – Calving rate set in national regulations not reached by all declared animals – Rate achieved by a smaller number of those animals – National practice refusing support.#Case C-538/22.

cjeu_case ·
11240

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 July 2024.#Caixabank SA and Others v Asociación de Usuarios de Bancos, Cajas de Ahorro y Seguros de España (Adicae) and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Mortgage loan agreements – Clauses limiting the variation of the interest rates – ‘Floor’ clauses – Collective action seeking an order to cease and desist from using those clauses and reimbursement of the payments made in that respect, involving a significant number of sellers or suppliers and consumers – Plain and intelligible nature of those clauses – Concept of the ‘average consumer who is reasonably well informed and reasonably observant and circumspect’.#Case C-450/22.

cjeu_case ·