Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
11042

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 July 2024.#Genmab A/S v Szellemi Tulajdon Nemzeti Hivatala.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Medicinal product for human use – Supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products (SPC) – Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 – Conditions for granting – Article 3(d) – First marketing authorisation (MA) – Medicinal products containing the same active ingredient being granted several MAs – Withdrawal of the prior MA.#Case C-181/24.

cjeu_case ·
11043

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 July 2024.#Genmab A/S v Szellemi Tulajdon Nemzeti Hivatala.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Medicinal product for human use – Supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products (SPC) – Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 – Conditions for granting – Article 3(d) – First marketing authorisation (MA) – Medicinal products containing the same active ingredient being granted several MAs – Withdrawal of the prior MA.#Case C-181/24.

cjeu_case ·
11045

Case C-181/24, Genmab: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék – Hungary) – Genmab A/S (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Medicinal product for human use – Supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products (SPC) – Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 – Conditions for granting – Article 3(d) – First marketing authorisation (MA) – Medicinal products containing the same active ingredient being granted several MAs – Withdrawal of the prior MA)

cjeu_case ·
11046

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 July 2024.#ATHINAÏKI ZYTHOPOIIA AE v Anexartiti Archi Dimosion Esodon.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law or admits of no reasonable doubt – Directive 92/83/EEC – Article 3(1) – Calculation of the amount of excise duty levied on beer – Method of calculating degrees Plato – Legislative amendment intended to clarify that method – Directive (EU) 2020/1151 – Article 1(1) – No effect of that directive on previously existing situations.#Case C-724/23.

cjeu_case ·
11047

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 July 2024.#ATHINAÏKI ZYTHOPOIIA AE v Anexartiti Archi Dimosion Esodon.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Dioikitiko Protodikeio Thessalonikis.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law or admits of no reasonable doubt – Directive 92/83/EEC – Article 3(1) – Calculation of the amount of excise duty levied on beer – Method of calculating degrees Plato – Legislative amendment intended to clarify that method – Directive (EU) 2020/1151 – Article 1(1) – No effect of that directive on previously existing situations.#Case C-724/23.

cjeu_case ·
11048

Case C-724/23, ATHINAÏKI ZYTHOPOIIA: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Dioikitiko Protodikeio Thessalonikis – Greece) – ATHINAÏKI ZYTHOPOIIA AE v Anexartiti Archi Dimosion Esodon (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law or admits of no reasonable doubt – Directive 92/83/EEC – Article 3(1) – Calculation of the amount of excise duty levied on beer – Method of calculating degrees Plato – Legislative amendment intended to clarify that method – Directive (EU) 2020/1151 – Article 1(1) – No effect of that directive on previously existing situations)

cjeu_case ·
11049

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 July 2024.#Aeris Invest Sàrl v Single Resolution Board.#Access to documents – Documents held by the SRB concerning the adoption of a resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español – Decision of the SRB Appeal Panel relating to a confirmatory decision by the SRB refusing access – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Exceptions to the right of public access to documents – Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Presumption of confidentiality – Misuse of powers – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-62/18.

cjeu_case ·
11050

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 July 2024.#Aeris Invest Sàrl v Single Resolution Board.#Access to documents – Documents held by the SRB concerning the adoption of a resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español – Decision of the SRB Appeal Panel relating to a confirmatory decision by the SRB refusing access – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Exceptions to the right of public access to documents – Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Presumption of confidentiality – Misuse of powers – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-62/18.

cjeu_case ·
11051

Case T-62/18: Order of the General Court of 16 July 2024 – Aeris Invest v SRB (Access to documents – Documents held by the SRB concerning the adoption of a resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español – Decision of the SRB Appeal Panel relating to a confirmatory decision by the SRB refusing access – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Exceptions to the right of public access to documents – Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Presumption of confidentiality – Misuse of powers – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

cjeu_case ·
11060

Case C-423/24: Order of the President of the Court of 12 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia no 1 de Fuenlabrada – Spain) – F.A.A. v Santander Consumer Finance, SA (Consumer protection – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Effects of a declaration that a term is unfair – Revolving credit card contract – Directives 87/102/EEC and 2008/48/EC – Obligations of the trader – Assessment of the consumer’s creditworthiness – Failure to state the APR – Penalties)

cjeu_case ·