10821Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 July 2024.#Asociaţia Crescătorilor de Vaci 'Bălţată Românească' Tip Simmental v Genetica din Transilvania Cooperativă Agricolă and Agenţia Naţională pentru Zootehnie 'Professor G. K. Constantinescu'.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common agricultural policy – Regulation (EU) 2016/1012 – Purebred breeding animals – Recognition procedure for breed societies – Approval procedure for breeding programmes – Possibility of refusing to approve a further breeding programme for the same breed, for the same territory, if such approval has potential to compromise an already existing breeding programme – Right of breeders of purebred animals to choose between the various existing breeding programmes.#Case C-286/23.cjeu_case · 29 июля 2024 г.
10822Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 July 2024.#Asociaţia Crescătorilor de Vaci 'Bălţată Românească' Tip Simmental v Genetica din Transilvania Cooperativă Agricolă and Agenţia Naţională pentru Zootehnie 'Professor G. K. Constantinescu'.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Braşov.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common agricultural policy – Regulation (EU) 2016/1012 – Purebred breeding animals – Recognition procedure for breed societies – Approval procedure for breeding programmes – Possibility of refusing to approve a further breeding programme for the same breed, for the same territory, if such approval has potential to compromise an already existing breeding programme – Right of breeders of purebred animals to choose between the various existing breeding programmes.#Case C-286/23.cjeu_case · 29 июля 2024 г.
10823Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 July 2024.#protectus s.r.o., anciennement BONUL, s.r.o. v Výbor Národnej rady Slovenskej republiky na preskúmavanie rozhodnutí Národného bezpečnostného úradu.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Decision 2013/488/EU – Classified information – Facility Security Clearance – Withdrawal of the clearance – Non-disclosure of classified information on which the withdrawal was based – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Obligation to state reasons – Access to the file – Principle of an adversarial process – Article 51 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Implementation of EU law.#Case C-185/23.cjeu_case · 29 июля 2024 г.
10824Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 July 2024.#protectus s.r.o. v Výbor Národnej rady Slovenskej republiky na preskúmavanie rozhodnutí Národného bezpečnostného úradu.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší správny súd Slovenskej republiky.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Decision 2013/488/EU – Classified information – Facility Security Clearance – Withdrawal of the clearance – Non-disclosure of classified information on which the withdrawal was based – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Obligation to state reasons – Access to the file – Principle of an adversarial process – Article 51 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Implementation of EU law.#Case C-185/23.cjeu_case · 29 июля 2024 г.
10825Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 29 July 2024.#HJ and Others v Twenty First Capital SAS.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Directive 2011/61/EU – Alternative investment fund managers (AIFMs) – Operating conditions – Article 13 – AIFM remuneration policies and practices – Scope ratione temporis – Article 61 – Transitional provisions.#Case C-174/23.cjeu_case · 29 июля 2024 г.
10826Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 29 July 2024.#HJ and Others v Twenty First Capital SAS.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Directive 2011/61/EU – Alternative investment fund managers (AIFMs) – Operating conditions – Article 13 – AIFM remuneration policies and practices – Scope ratione temporis – Article 61 – Transitional provisions.#Case C-174/23.cjeu_case · 29 июля 2024 г.
10827Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 July 2024.#Virgilijus Valančius v Lietuvos Republikos Vyriausybė.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Third subparagraph of Article 19(2) TEU – Second paragraph of Article 254 TFEU – Appointment of Judges of the General Court of the European Union – Independence beyond doubt – Ability required for appointment to high judicial office – National procedure for proposing a candidate for the office of Judge of the General Court of the European Union – Group of independent experts responsible for assessing the candidates – Merit list of candidates meeting the requirements laid down in the third subparagraph of Article 19(2) TEU and the second paragraph of Article 254 TFEU – Proposal of a candidate named on the merit list other than the top-ranked candidate – Opinion of the panel provided for in Article 255 TFEU on the suitability of candidates.#Case C-119/23.cjeu_case · 29 июля 2024 г.
10828Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 July 2024.#Virgilijus Valančius v Lietuvos Republikos Vyriausybė.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vilniaus apygardos administracinis teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Third subparagraph of Article 19(2) TEU – Second paragraph of Article 254 TFEU – Appointment of Judges of the General Court of the European Union – Independence beyond doubt – Ability required for appointment to high judicial office – National procedure for proposing a candidate for the office of Judge of the General Court of the European Union – Group of independent experts responsible for assessing the candidates – Merit list of candidates meeting the requirements laid down in the third subparagraph of Article 19(2) TEU and the second paragraph of Article 254 TFEU – Proposal of a candidate named on the merit list other than the top-ranked candidate – Opinion of the panel provided for in Article 255 TFEU on the suitability of candidates.#Case C-119/23.cjeu_case · 29 июля 2024 г.
10829Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 July 2024.#Validity Foundation - Mental Disability Advocacy Centre v European Commission.#Appeal – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Article 4(3) – Access to documents drawn up by an institution for internal use or relating to a matter where a decision has not been taken by that institution – Documents relating to a draft call for proposals co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) – Decision refusing access to documents originating from a Member State – Decision granting access to those documents, adopted after the action for annulment of the decision refusing access was brought – No interest in bringing proceedings.#Case C-51/23 P.cjeu_case · 29 июля 2024 г.
10830Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 July 2024.#Validity Foundation - Mental Disability Advocacy Centre v European Commission.#Appeal – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Article 4(3) – Access to documents drawn up by an institution for internal use or relating to a matter where a decision has not been taken by that institution – Documents relating to a draft call for proposals co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) – Decision refusing access to documents originating from a Member State – Decision granting access to those documents, adopted after the action for annulment of the decision refusing access was brought – No interest in bringing proceedings.#Case C-51/23 P.cjeu_case · 29 июля 2024 г.
10831Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 29 July 2024.#Keva and Others v Skatteverket.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 63 TFEU – Free movement of capital – Taxation of dividends received by pension funds governed by public law – Difference in treatment between resident and non-resident pension funds governed by public law – Exemption only of resident pension funds governed by public law – Comparability of situations – Whether justified – Need to safeguard the objective pursued by social policy – Need to preserve a balanced allocation of the power of taxation of the Member States.#Case C-39/23.cjeu_case · 29 июля 2024 г.
10832Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 29 July 2024.#Keva and Others v Skatteverket.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 63 TFEU – Free movement of capital – Taxation of dividends received by pension funds governed by public law – Difference in treatment between resident and non-resident pension funds governed by public law – Exemption only of resident pension funds governed by public law – Comparability of situations – Whether justified – Need to safeguard the objective pursued by social policy – Need to preserve a balanced allocation of the power of taxation of the Member States.#Case C-39/23.cjeu_case · 29 июля 2024 г.
10833Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 July 2024.#XXX v État belge, représenté par la Secrétaire d’État à l’Asile et la Migration.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Immigration policy – Directive (EU) 2016/801 – Conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals for the purposes of studies – Article 20(2)(f) – Application for admission to the territory of a Member State for the purposes of studies – Other purposes – Refusal of a visa – Grounds for rejection of the application – Failure to transpose – General principle that abusive practices are prohibited – Article 34(5) – Procedural autonomy of the Member States – Fundamental right to an effective judicial remedy – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-14/23.cjeu_case · 29 июля 2024 г.
10834Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 July 2024.#XXX v État belge.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'état (Belgium).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Immigration policy – Directive (EU) 2016/801 – Conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals for the purposes of studies – Article 20(2)(f) – Application for admission to the territory of a Member State for the purposes of studies – Other purposes – Refusal of a visa – Grounds for rejection of the application – Failure to transpose – General principle that abusive practices are prohibited – Article 34(5) – Procedural autonomy of the Member States – Fundamental right to an effective judicial remedy – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-14/23.cjeu_case · 29 июля 2024 г.
10835C-435/23, Glavna direktsia Granichna politsia: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okrazhen sad – Smolyan – Bulgaria) – Glavna direktsia Granichna politsia kam Ministerstvo na vatreshnite raboti v BO (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Social policy – Organisation of working time – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 12(а) – Articles 20 and 31 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Safety and health of night workers – Level of protection for night workers appropriate to the nature of their work – Police officers and firefighters performing shift and night work – Public sector workers and private sector workers – Equal treatment)cjeu_case · 29 июля 2024 г.
10836Case C-286/23, Asociaţia Crescătorilor de Vaci Bălţată Românească Tip Simmental: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Braşov – Romania) – Asociaţia Crescătorilor de Vaci Bălţată Românească Tip Simmental v Genetica din Transilvania Cooperativă Agricolă, Agenţia Naţională pentru Zootehnie Professor G.K. Constantinescu (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common agricultural policy – Regulation (EU) 2016/1012 – Purebred breeding animals – Recognition procedure for breed societies – Approval procedure for breeding programmes – Possibility of refusing to approve a further breeding programme for the same breed, for the same territory, if such approval has potential to compromise an already existing breeding programme – Right of breeders of purebred animals to choose between the various existing breeding programmes)cjeu_case · 29 июля 2024 г.
10837Case C-185/23, protectus: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší správny súd Slovenskej republiky – Slovakia) – protectus s.r.o., formerly BONUL, s.r.o. v Výbor Národnej rady Slovenskej republiky na preskúmavanie rozhodnutí Národného bezpečnostného úradu (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Decision 2013/488/EU – Classified information – Facility Security Clearance – Withdrawal of the clearance – Non-disclosure of classified information on which the withdrawal was based – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Obligation to state reasons – Access to the file – Principle of an adversarial process – Article 51 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Implementation of EU law)cjeu_case · 29 июля 2024 г.
10838Case C-174/23, Twenty First Capital: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 29 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation – France) – HJ, IK, LM v Twenty First Capital SAS (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Directive 2011/61/EU – Alternative investment fund managers (AIFMs) – Operating conditions – Article 13 – AIFM remuneration policies and practices – Scope ratione temporis – Article 61 – Transitional provisions)cjeu_case · 29 июля 2024 г.
10839Case C-119/23, Valančius: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vilniaus apygardos administracinis teismas – Lithuania) – Virgilijus Valančius v Lietuvos Republikos Vyriausybė (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Third subparagraph of Article 19(2) TEU – Second paragraph of Article 254 TFEU – Appointment of Judges of the General Court of the European Union – Independence beyond doubt – Ability required for appointment to high judicial office – National procedure for proposing a candidate for the office of Judge of the General Court of the European Union – Group of independent experts responsible for assessing the candidates – Merit list of candidates meeting the requirements laid down in the third subparagraph of Article 19(2) TEU and the second paragraph of Article 254 TFEU – Proposal of a candidate named on the merit list other than the top-ranked candidate – Opinion of the panel provided for in Article 255 TFEU on the suitability of candidates)cjeu_case · 29 июля 2024 г.
10840Case C-51/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 July 2024 – Validity Foundation – Mental Disability Advocacy Centre v European Commission (Appeal – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Article 4(3) – Access to documents drawn up by an institution for internal use or relating to a matter where a decision has not been taken by that institution – Documents relating to a draft call for proposals co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) – Decision refusing access to documents originating from a Member State – Decision granting access to those documents, adopted after the action for annulment of the decision refusing access was brought – No interest in bringing proceedings)cjeu_case · 29 июля 2024 г.