10621Case C-540/24, Cabris Investments: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Handelsgericht Wien (Austria) lodged on 8 August 2024 – Cabris Investments Ltd v Revetas Capital Advisors LLPcjeu_case · 8 августа 2024 г.
10622Case T-415/24: Action brought on 7 August 2024 – Cham Wings Airlines v Councilcjeu_case · 7 августа 2024 г.
10624Case T-413/24: Action brought on 7 August 2024 – Shammout v Councilcjeu_case · 7 августа 2024 г.
10625Case T-410/24: Action brought on 7 August 2024 – SA.PI.SE. v EUIPO – Riso Gallo (VENERE)cjeu_case · 7 августа 2024 г.
10626Case C-539/24, Mikroregion Porta Bohemica: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud (Czech Republic) lodged on 7 August 2024 – Mikroregion Porta Bohemica v Odvolací finanční ředitelstvícjeu_case · 7 августа 2024 г.
10627Order of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 7 August 2024.#Synapsa Med sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Appointment of a new representative – Applicant having ceased to respond to requests from the Court – Article 131(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – No need to adjudicate.#Case T-125/23.cjeu_case · 7 августа 2024 г.
10628Order of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 7 August 2024.#Synapsa Med sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Appointment of a new representative – Applicant having ceased to respond to requests from the Court – Article 131(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – No need to adjudicate.#Case T-125/23.cjeu_case · 7 августа 2024 г.
10629EU trade mark – Appointment of a new representative – Applicant having ceased to respond to requests from the General Court – Article 131(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – No need to adjudicate: Order of the General Court of 7 August 2024 – Synapsa Med v EUIPO – Gravity Brand Holdings (Gravity) (Case T-125/23)cjeu_case · 7 августа 2024 г.
10630Order of the President of the General Court of 6 August 2024.#Cortex Havacilik ve Turizm Ticaret AŞ v European Commission.#Interim measures – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition for any non-Russian-registered aircraft which is owned or chartered, or otherwise controlled by any Russian natural or legal person, entity or body, to land in, take off from or overfly the territory of the European Union – Article 3d of Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Manifest inadmissibility of the main action – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility.#Case T-213/24 R.cjeu_case · 6 августа 2024 г.
10631Order of the President of the General Court of 6 August 2024.#Cortex Havacilik ve Turizm Ticaret AŞ v European Commission.#Interim measures – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition for any non-Russian-registered aircraft which is owned or chartered, or otherwise controlled by any Russian natural or legal person, entity or body, to land in, take off from or overfly the territory of the European Union – Article 3d of Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Manifest inadmissibility of the main action – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility.#Case T-213/24 R.cjeu_case · 6 августа 2024 г.
10632Case T-412/24: Action brought on 6 August 2024 – Makhlouf v Councilcjeu_case · 6 августа 2024 г.
10633Case T-409/24: Action brought on 6 August 2024 – Al-Aqeelah Takaful Insurance Company v Councilcjeu_case · 6 августа 2024 г.
10634Case T-408/24: Action brought on 6 August 2024 – Intrawork and Others v eu-LISAcjeu_case · 6 августа 2024 г.
10635Case T-213/24 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 6 August 2024 – Cortex Havacilik ve Turizm Ticaret v Commission (Interim measures – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition for any non-Russian-registered aircraft which is owned or chartered, or otherwise controlled by any Russian natural or legal person, entity or body, to land in, take off from or overfly the territory of the European Union – Article 3d of Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Manifest inadmissibility of the main action – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 6 августа 2024 г.
10636Case C-538/24 P: Appeal brought on 6 August 2024 by Penguin Random House Grupo Editorial, SAU against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 29 May 2024 in Case T-777/22, Penguin Random House v EUIPO – Ediciones Literarias Independientes (PLAN B)cjeu_case · 6 августа 2024 г.
10637Case C-537/24 P: Appeal brought on 6 August 2024 by the Single Resolution Board against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 3 July 2024 in Case T-406/22, Volkskreditbank v Single Resolution Boardcjeu_case · 6 августа 2024 г.
10638Case C-536/24 P: Appeal brought on 6 August 2024 by the Single Resolution Board against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 29 May 2024 in Case T-395/22, Hypo Vorarlberg Bank AG v Single Resolution Boardcjeu_case · 6 августа 2024 г.
10639Case C-535/24, Svilosa: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad – Veliko Tarnovo (Bulgaria) lodged on 6 August 2024 – Svilosa AD v Direktor na Direktsia Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika – Veliko Tarnovocjeu_case · 6 августа 2024 г.
10640Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 6 August 2024.#BHW Bausparkasse AG v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the ex ante contributions for the 2023 contribution period – Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Action manifestly well founded – Limitation of the temporal effects of the order.#Case T-488/23.cjeu_case · 6 августа 2024 г.