8401Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 January 2025.#Drinks Prod SRL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark OmniSan – Earlier EU word mark Omnistrip – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-189/24.cjeu_case · 8 января 2025 г.
8402Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 January 2025.#Drinks Prod SRL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark OmniSan – Earlier EU word mark Omnistrip – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-189/24.cjeu_case · 8 января 2025 г.
8403Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 January 2025.#Rat Pack Filmproduktion GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark RATPAC – Earlier national word mark RAT PACK – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity of the services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-163/24.cjeu_case · 8 января 2025 г.
8404Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 January 2025.#Rat Pack Filmproduktion GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark RATPAC – Earlier national word mark RAT PACK – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity of the services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-163/24.cjeu_case · 8 января 2025 г.
8405Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 January 2025.#Cinkciarz.pl sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the figurative European Union trade mark €$ W Think for You – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-20/24.cjeu_case · 8 января 2025 г.
8406Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 January 2025.#Cinkciarz.pl sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the figurative European Union trade mark €$ W Think for You – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-20/24.cjeu_case · 8 января 2025 г.
8407Case T-395/24: Order of the General Court of 8 January 2025 – Freiraum v EUIPO – MeisterLabs (MemoMeister) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Withdrawal of opposition – No need to adjudicate)cjeu_case · 8 января 2025 г.
8408Case T-364/24: Order of the General Court of 8 January 2025 – Wycon v EUIPO – Wiqo (WIQO)cjeu_case · 8 января 2025 г.
8409Case T-189/24: Judgment of the General Court of 8 January 2025 – Drinks Prod v EUIPO – Paul Hartmann (OmniSan) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark OmniSan – Earlier EU word mark Omnistrip – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 8 января 2025 г.
8410Case T-163/24: Judgment of the General Court of 8 January 2025 – Rat Pack Filmproduktion v EUIPO – RatPac Entertainment (RATPAC) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark RATPAC – Earlier national word mark RAT PACK – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity of the services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 8 января 2025 г.
8411Case T-20/24: Judgment of the General Court of 8 January 2025 – Cinkciarz.pl v EUIPO (€$ We Think for You) (EU trade mark – Application for the figurative European Union trade mark €$ W Think for You – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 8 января 2025 г.
8412Order of the Court of 8 January 2025.#Peikko Group Oy v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request not demonstrating that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-577/24 P.cjeu_case · 8 января 2025 г.
8413Order of the Court of 8 January 2025.#Peikko Group Oy v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request not demonstrating that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-577/24 P.cjeu_case · 8 января 2025 г.
8414Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 8 January 2025.#Fresh Tropical Srl by Jawad v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark AlìBabà – Earlier EU word mark ALIBABA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-1082/23.cjeu_case · 8 января 2025 г.
8415Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 8 January 2025.#Fresh Tropical Srl by Jawad v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark AlìBabà – Earlier EU word mark ALIBABA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-1082/23.cjeu_case · 8 января 2025 г.
8416Case T-1082/23: Judgment of the General Court of 8 January 2025 – Fresh Tropical v EUIPO – Altunyaldiz (AlìBabà) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark AlìBabà – Earlier EU word mark ALIBABA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 8 января 2025 г.
8417Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 January 2025.#Thomas Bindl v European Commission.#Processing of personal data – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies – Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 – Concept of ‘transfer of personal data to a third country’ – Transfer of data when visiting a website – EU Login – Action for annulment – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility – Action for failure to act – Position taken ending the inaction – No need to adjudicate – Action for damages – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Causal link – Non-material damage.#Case T-354/22.cjeu_case · 8 января 2025 г.
8418Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 January 2025.#Thomas Bindl v European Commission.#Processing of personal data – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies – Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 – Concept of ‘transfer of personal data to a third country’ – Transfer of data when visiting a website – EU Login – Action for annulment – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility – Action for failure to act – Position taken ending the inaction – No need to adjudicate – Action for damages – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Causal link – Non-material damage.#Case T-354/22.cjeu_case · 8 января 2025 г.
8419Joint Cases T-236/22 and T-417/22: Order of the General Court of 8 January 2025 – Intel Corporation v Commissioncjeu_case · 8 января 2025 г.
8420Case T-354/22: Judgment of the General Court of 8 January 2025 – Bindl v Commission (Processing of personal data – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies – Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 – Concept of transfer of personal data to a third country – Transfer of data when visiting a website – EU Login – Action for annulment – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility – Action for failure to act – Position taken ending the inaction – No need to adjudicate – Action for damages – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Causal link – Non-material damage)cjeu_case · 8 января 2025 г.