Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
8081

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 January 2025.#Criminal proceedings against EX.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the cour d'appel de Liège.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Migrant workers – Social security – Applicable legislation – Posted workers – Documents in the form of A1 certificates allegedly issued by the institution competent to issue those certificates – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 76(6) – Obligation of the authorities of the host Member State to initiate a dialogue and conciliation procedure for the purpose of determining whether fraud has occurred.#Case C-421/23.

cjeu_case ·
8083

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 January 2025.#Proceedings brought by E.V.G.-T.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Lörrach.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Concept of ‘court or tribunal’ – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – European Certificate of Succession – Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 – Article 67(1) – Decisions taken by the issuing authority – No exercise of a judicial function – Inadmissibility.#Case C-187/23.

cjeu_case ·
8084

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 January 2025.#European Union Intellectual Property Office v Neoperl AG.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Article 4 – Signs of which an EU trade mark may consist – Application for registration of a tactile position mark representing a cylindrical sanitary insert – Article 7 – Absolute grounds for refusal – Obligation to examine at the outset the ground for refusal laid down in Article 7(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 – None – Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 72(3) – Power of the General Court to alter the decision of the Board of Appeal – Limits.#Case C-93/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
8085

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 January 2025.#European Union Intellectual Property Office v Neoperl AG.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Article 4 – Signs of which an EU trade mark may consist – Application for registration of a tactile position mark representing a cylindrical sanitary insert – Article 7 – Absolute grounds for refusal – Obligation to examine at the outset the ground for refusal laid down in Article 7(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 – None – Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 72(3) – Power of the General Court to alter the decision of the Board of Appeal – Limits.#Case C-93/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
8086

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 23 January 2025.#‘Tauritus’ UAB v Muitinės departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Union Customs Code – Method for determining the customs value – Article 70 – Transaction value – Goods imported on the basis of a provisional purchase price – Definitive price dependent on various factors not known on the date of acceptance of the customs declaration.#Case C-782/23.

cjeu_case ·
8087

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 23 January 2025.#Bundesminister für Soziales, Gesundheit, Pflege und Konsumentenschutz v M M.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products – Directive 2014/40/EU – Article 2(40) – Concept of ‘placing on the market’ – Article 23(2) – Enforcement – Scope – Placing on the market of tobacco products the packaging of which includes non-compliant elements – Supply of tobacco products by a wholesaler to a retail outlet – Fine imposed on the managing director of a company acting as a wholesaler.#Case C-717/23.

cjeu_case ·
8088

Case C-677/23, Slovenská sporiteľňa (Information in consumer credit agreements): Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 January 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský súd v Prešove – Slovakia) – A. B., F. B. v Slovenská sporitel’ňa a.s. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Credit agreements for consumers – Directive 2008/48/EC – Requirements relating to information to be included in such a credit agreement – Duty to provide information – Duration of the agreement – Annual percentage rate of charge (APRC) – Assumptions used in order to calculate the APRC)

cjeu_case ·
8089

Case C-577/23: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 23 January 2025 – European Commission v Republic of Estonia (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Guarantees of independence and resources for national competition authorities in order to implement Articles 101 and 102 TFEU – Directive (EU) 2019/1 – Failure to transpose and to notify the transposition measures – Article 260(3) TFEU – Financial penalties – Application for the imposition of a lump sum and a daily penalty payment)

cjeu_case ·
8090

Case C-518/23, NEW Niederrhein Energie und Wasser: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 23 January 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof – Germany) – Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände – Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V. v NEW Niederrhein Energie und Wasser GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Unfair commercial practices – Directive 2005/29/EC – Article 7 – Misleading omissions – Invitation to purchase – Material information – Information to be provided to the consumer on the manner in which the price is calculated – Online electricity supply offer – Tariff calculator – Indication of a percentage increase in the price applicable to the consumer)

cjeu_case ·
8091

Case C-490/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 January 2025 – Neos SpA v Ryanair DAC, European Commission, Blue panorama airlines SpA, Air Dolomiti SpA – Linee aeree regionali Europee (Appeal – State aid – Aid scheme – Measures intended to support airlines holding a national operating licence in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Decision by the European Commission not to raise any objections – Obligation to state reasons)

cjeu_case ·
8092

Case C-421/23, ONSS (Forged A1 certificates): Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 January 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the cour d’appel de Liège – Belgium) – Criminal proceedings against EX (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Migrant workers – Social security – Applicable legislation – Posted workers – Documents in the form of A1 certificates allegedly issued by the institution competent to issue those certificates – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 76(6) – Obligation of the authorities of the host Member State to initiate a dialogue and conciliation procedure for the purpose of determining whether fraud has occurred)

cjeu_case ·
8093

Case C-187/23, Albausy: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 January 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Lörrach – Germany) – proceedings brought by E. V. G.-T. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Concept of court or tribunal – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – European Certificate of Succession – Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 – Article 67(1) – Decisions taken by the issuing authority – No exercise of a judicial function – Inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
8094

Case C-93/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 January 2025 – European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) v Neoperl AG (Appeal – EU trade mark – Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Article 4 – Signs of which an EU trade mark may consist – Application for registration of a tactile position mark representing a cylindrical sanitary insert – Article 7 – Absolute grounds for refusal – Obligation to examine at the outset the ground for refusal laid down in Article 7(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 – None – Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 72(3) – Power of the General Court to alter the decision of the Board of Appeal – Limits)

cjeu_case ·
8095

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 23 January 2025.#European Parliament v Axa Assurances Luxembourg SA and Others.#Appeal – Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – More than one defendant in the proceedings at first instance – Judgment in default against one of those defendants which is the subject of an application before the General Court of the European Union to have it set aside – Admissibility of the appeal brought against that judgment – Conditions – Article 41 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Admissibility of the response to an appeal submitted by a party against which an order was made by default at first instance – Article 172 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Cross-appeal brought by a party against which an order was made by default and which has made an application to set aside to the General Court – Article 176(1) and Article 178 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Inadmissibility – Arbitration clause – Article 272 TFEU – Insurance contract concluded by the European Parliament – Exclusion clause in respect of damage relating directly or indirectly to flooding – Scope.#Case C-766/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
8096

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 23 January 2025.#European Parliament v Axa Assurances Luxembourg SA and Others.#Appeal – Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – More than one defendant in the proceedings at first instance – Judgment in default against one of those defendants which is the subject of an application before the General Court of the European Union to have it set aside – Admissibility of the appeal brought against that judgment – Conditions – Article 41 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Admissibility of the response to an appeal submitted by a party against which an order was made by default at first instance – Article 172 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Cross-appeal brought by a party against which an order was made by default and which has made an application to set aside to the General Court – Article 176(1) and Article 178 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Inadmissibility – Arbitration clause – Article 272 TFEU – Insurance contract concluded by the European Parliament – Exclusion clause in respect of damage relating directly or indirectly to flooding – Scope.#Case C-766/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
8097

Case C-766/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 23 January 2025 – European Parliament v Axa Assurances Luxembourg and Others (Appeal – Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – More than one defendant in the proceedings at first instance – Judgment in default against one of those defendants which is the subject of an application before the General Court of the European Union to have it set aside – Admissibility of the appeal brought against that judgment – Conditions – Article 41 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Admissibility of the response to an appeal submitted by a party against which an order was made by default at first instance – Article 172 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Cross-appeal brought by a party against which an order was made by default and which has made an application to set aside to the General Court – Article 176(1) and Article 178 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Inadmissibility – Arbitration clause – Article 272 TFEU – Insurance contract concluded by the European Parliament – Exclusion clause in respect of damage relating directly or indirectly to flooding – Scope)

cjeu_case ·