Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
7941

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 30 January 2025.#Maud Tea & Seed Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Plant protection products – Active substances clothianidin and thiamethoxam – Determination of maximum residue levels for the relevant active substances in or on certain products – Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 – Lawfulness of the authority to act given to the applicant’s lawyers – No direct concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-247/23.

cjeu_case ·
7942

Case T-247/23: Order of the General Court of 30 January 2025 – Maud Tea & Seed v Commission (Action for annulment – Plant protection products – Active substances clothianidin and thiamethoxam – Determination of maximum residue levels for the relevant active substances in or on certain products – Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 – Lawfulness of the authority to act given to the applicant’s lawyers – No direct concern – Inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
7944

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 January 2025.#Giovanni Frajese v European Commission.#Appeal – Public health – Medicinal products for human use – Marketing authorisation – Spikevax – Comirnaty – Action for annulment – Independence and impartiality of the Courts of the European Union – Failure to comply with procedural rules – Failure to give adequate reasons, and contradictory reasoning – Legal interest in bringing proceedings – Locus standi – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Right to effective judicial protection.#Case C-586/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
7945

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 January 2025.#Giovanni Frajese v European Commission.#Appeal – Public health – Medicinal products for human use – Marketing authorisation – Spikevax – Comirnaty – Action for annulment – Independence and impartiality of the Courts of the European Union – Failure to comply with procedural rules – Failure to give adequate reasons, and contradictory reasoning – Legal interest in bringing proceedings – Locus standi – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Right to effective judicial protection.#Case C-586/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
7946

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 30 January 2025.#Caronte & Tourist SpA v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of dominant position – Empowering national competition authorities to enforce the rules on competition – Directive (EU) 2019/1 – Independence of national competition authorities – Article 4(5) – Setting priorities for the proceedings for the enforcement of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU – Fines on undertakings and associations of undertakings – Article 13 – Procedures for infringement of the rules of competition law – Compliance with a reasonable time limit – National legislation requiring the national authority to issue a statement of objections within a time limit of 90 days of knowledge of the essential elements of the infringement – Automatic annulment in its entirety of the decision of the national competition authority in the event of failure to comply with that time limit – Principle ne bis in idem – Revocation of the power to initiate new infringement proceedings in respect of the same facts – Principle of effectiveness – Rights of defence of undertakings.#Case C-511/23.

cjeu_case ·
7947

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 30 January 2025.#Caronte & Tourist SpA v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of dominant position – Empowering national competition authorities to enforce the rules on competition – Directive (EU) 2019/1 – Independence of national competition authorities – Article 4(5) – Setting priorities for the proceedings for the enforcement of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU – Fines on undertakings and associations of undertakings – Article 13 – Procedures for infringement of the rules of competition law – Compliance with a reasonable time limit – National legislation requiring the national authority to issue a statement of objections within a time limit of 90 days of knowledge of the essential elements of the infringement – Automatic annulment in its entirety of the decision of the national competition authority in the event of failure to comply with that time limit – Principle ne bis in idem – Revocation of the power to initiate new infringement proceedings in respect of the same facts – Principle of effectiveness – Rights of defence of undertakings.#Case C-511/23.

cjeu_case ·
7948

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 30 January 2025.#Trenitalia SpA v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market – Directive 2005/29/EC – Measures intended to combat such practices – Articles 11 and 13 – Procedures for infringement of the rules of consumer law – Compliance with a reasonable time limit – National legislation requiring the national authority to issue a statement of objections within a time limit of 90 days of knowledge of the essential elements of the infringement – Automatic annulment in its entirety of the decision of the national authority in the event of failure to comply with that time limit – Principle ne bis in idem – Revocation of the power to initiate new infringement proceedings in respect of the same facts – Principle of effectiveness – Rights of defence of undertakings.#Case C-510/23.

cjeu_case ·
7949

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 30 January 2025.#Engie Romania SA v Autoritatea Naţională de Reglementare în Domeniul Energiei.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Energy – Internal market in natural gas – Directive 2009/73/EC – Article 3(1) – Obligations of Member States towards natural gas undertakings – Consumer protection – Articles 40 and 41 – Powers of the regulatory authority – Breach by a natural gas undertaking of its duty of transparency towards consumers – Duplication of penalties for the same unlawful conduct – Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings for the same criminal offence – Ne bis in idem – Article 52(1) – Limitations on the exercise of that fundamental right – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-205/23.

cjeu_case ·
7950

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 30 January 2025.#Engie România SA v Autoritatea Naţională de Reglementare în Domeniul Energiei.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Energy – Internal market in natural gas – Directive 2009/73/EC – Article 3(1) – Obligations of Member States towards natural gas undertakings – Consumer protection – Articles 40 and 41 – Powers of the regulatory authority – Breach by a natural gas undertaking of its duty of transparency towards consumers – Duplication of penalties for the same unlawful conduct – Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings for the same criminal offence – Ne bis in idem – Article 52(1) – Limitations on the exercise of that fundamental right – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-205/23.

cjeu_case ·
7951

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 30 January 2025.#Liège Airport Security v État belge, représenté par le Ministre de l’Intérieur.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 – Civil aviation security – Article 4 – Common basic standards – Article 9 – Appropriate authority – Member State’s obligation to designate a single authority to be responsible for the coordination and monitoring of the implementation of safety standards – Scope – National authority responsible for ensuring compliance with national regulations governing the exercise of private safety activities.#Case C-783/23.

cjeu_case ·
7952

Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 30 January 2025.#PJ Carroll & Company Ltd and Nicoventures Trading Ltd v The Minister for Health and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Irlande).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public health – Directive 2014/40/EU – Article 7(12) – Article 11(6) – Delegated Directive (EU) 2022/2100 – Validity – Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products – Delegation of power to the European Commission – Novel tobacco products – Heated tobacco products – Power to withdraw exemptions from prohibitions of flavourings and labelling requirements – Substantial change of circumstances.#Case C-759/23.

cjeu_case ·
7953

Opinion of Advocate General Spielmann delivered on 30 January 2025.#W and X v Belgische Staat and État belge, représenté par la Secrétaire d’État à l’Asile et la Migration.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad voor Vreemdelingenbetwistingen and Conseil du Contentieux des Étrangers.#References for a preliminary ruling – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Immigration policy – Directive 2008/115/EC – Common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals – Article 3(4) and (6), Article 7(1) and (4), Article 8(1) and (2), Article 11(1) and Article 13 – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Return decision – Decision not to grant a period for voluntary departure – Entry ban – Actionable administrative act – Enforceability of a return decision not containing a provision relating to the period for voluntary departure – Right to an effective remedy – Entry ban decision adopted after a considerable period of time.#Joined Cases C-636/23 and C-637/23.

cjeu_case ·
7954

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 30 January 2025.#SALUS Haus Dr. med Otto Greither Nachf. GmbH & Co.KG v Astrid Twardy GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medicinal products for human use – Directive 2001/83/EC – Article 1(29) – Article 16a – Traditional herbal medicinal products – Article 62 – Information which is useful to the patient – Regulation (EU) 2018/848 – Article 2(1) – Scope – Indications on the outer packaging of a medicinal herbal tea – Use of terms referring to organic production.#Case C-618/23.

cjeu_case ·
7955

Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 30 January 2025.#Makeleio EPE and Zougla G.R. AE v Ethniko Symvoulio Radiotileorasis (ESR).#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2010/13/EU – Audiovisual media service providers – National legislation requiring respect for human dignity and prohibiting the broadcasting of content of poor quality – Principle of interpreting national law in conformity with EU law – Limits – Principle that offences and penalties must be defined by law – Principle of legal certainty.#Joined Cases C-555/23 and C-556/23.

cjeu_case ·
7956

Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 30 January 2025.#European Parliament v TC.#Appeal – Law governing the institutions – European Parliament – Rules governing expenses and allowances for Members of Parliament – Parliamentary assistance allowance – Recovery of sums unduly paid – Article 41(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to be heard – Right of access to the file – Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the European Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies – Article 9 – Transmissions of personal data to recipients established in the European Union other than Union institutions and bodies – Article 26 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union.#Case C-529/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
7957

Opinion of Advocate General Norkus delivered on 30 January 2025.#ZR v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).#Appeal – Civil service – Interinstitutional transfer – Transfer application on the basis of Article 8 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, submitted in response to a vacancy notice – Rejection of that application – Obligation to take account of the order of priority laid down in Article 29(1) of those regulations – Errors of law – Contradictory reasoning.#Case C-364/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
7959

Case C-586/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 January 2025 – Giovanni Frajese v European Commission (Appeal – Public health – Medicinal products for human use – Marketing authorisation – Spikevax – Comirnaty – Action for annulment – Independence and impartiality of the Courts of the European Union – Failure to comply with procedural rules – Failure to give adequate reasons, and contradictory reasoning – Legal interest in bringing proceedings – Locus standi – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Right to effective judicial protection)

cjeu_case ·
7960

Case C-511/23, Caronte & Tourist: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 30 January 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Lazio – Italy) – Caronte & Tourist SpA v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of dominant position – Empowering national competition authorities to enforce the rules on competition – Directive (EU) 2019/1 – Independence of national competition authorities – Article 4(5) – Setting priorities for the proceedings for the enforcement of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU – Fines on undertakings and associations of undertakings – Article 13 – Procedures for infringement of the rules of competition law – Compliance with a reasonable time limit – National legislation requiring the national authority to issue a statement of objections within a time limit of 90 days of knowledge of the essential elements of the infringement – Automatic annulment in its entirety of the decision of the national competition authority in the event of failure to comply with that time limit – Principle ne bis in idem – Revocation of the power to initiate new infringement proceedings in respect of the same facts – Principle of effectiveness – Rights of defence of undertakings)

cjeu_case ·