7801Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 February 2025.#'Solvay Sodi' AD v Zamestnik-predsedatel na Darzhavna agentsia 'Darzhaven rezerv i voennovremenni zapasi'.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad - Varna.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Need for interpretation of EU law to enable the referring court to give judgment – None – Requirement to provide reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-784/22.cjeu_case · 12 февраля 2025 г.
7802Case C-784/22, Solvay Sodi: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 February 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad – Varna – Bulgaria) – Solvay Sodi AD v Zamestnik-predsedatel na Darzhavna agentsia Darzhaven rezerv i voennovremenni zapasi (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Need for interpretation of EU law to enable the referring court to give judgment – None – Requirement to provide reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 12 февраля 2025 г.
7803Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2025.#de Volksbank NV v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and Monetary Union – Banking Union – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the ex ante contributions for the 2018 contribution period – Articles 4, 14 and 16 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63 – Principle of good administration.#Case T-406/18.cjeu_case · 12 февраля 2025 г.
7804Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2025.#de Volksbank NV v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and Monetary Union – Banking Union – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the ex ante contributions for the 2018 contribution period – Articles 4, 14 and 16 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63 – Principle of good administration.#Case T-406/18.cjeu_case · 12 февраля 2025 г.
7805Case T-406/18: Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2025 – de Volksbank v SRB (2018 ex ante contributions) (Economic and Monetary Union – Banking Union – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the ex ante contributions for the 2018 contribution period – Articles 4, 14 and 16 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63 – Principle of good administration)cjeu_case · 12 февраля 2025 г.
7806Case T-101/25: Action brought on 11 February 2025 – Goetz v Councilcjeu_case · 11 февраля 2025 г.
7808Case C-134/25 P: Appeal brought on 11 February 2025 by Blue Underwriting Agency SpA, formerly Blue Underwriting Agency Srl, against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber), delivered on 11 December 2024 in Case T-447/23, Blue Underwriting Agency v EUIPO – Blue Assistance (blue is underwriting)cjeu_case · 11 февраля 2025 г.
7809Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 11 February 2025.#Corinne Reverbel v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents concerning the production of COVID-19 vaccines – Implied refusal of access – Express decision adopted after the action was brought – No need to adjudicate.#Case T-178/24.cjeu_case · 11 февраля 2025 г.
7810Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 11 February 2025.#Corinne Reverbel v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents concerning the production of COVID-19 vaccines – Implied refusal of access – Express decision adopted after the action was brought – No need to adjudicate.#Case T-178/24.cjeu_case · 11 февраля 2025 г.
7811Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 February 2025.#BT v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Surviving spouse – Liability – Material and non-material damage – Res judicata – Partial inadmissibility – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Equal treatment – Action in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-162/24.cjeu_case · 11 февраля 2025 г.
7812Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 February 2025.#BT v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Surviving spouse – Liability – Material and non-material damage – Res judicata – Partial inadmissibility – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Equal treatment – Action in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-162/24.cjeu_case · 11 февраля 2025 г.
7813Case T-178/24: Order of the General Court of 11 February 2025 – Reverbel v Commission (Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents concerning the production of COVID-19 vaccines – Implied refusal of access – Express decision adopted after the action was brought – No need to adjudicate)cjeu_case · 11 февраля 2025 г.
7814Case T-162/24: Order of the General Court of 11 February 2025 – BT v Commission (Civil service – Officials – Surviving spouse – Liability – Material and non-material damage – Res judicata – Partial inadmissibility – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Equal treatment – Action in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)cjeu_case · 11 февраля 2025 г.
7815Order of the Court of 11 February 2025.#W.B. Studio Sas di Wivian Bodini & C. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-608/24 P.cjeu_case · 11 февраля 2025 г.
7816Order of the Court of 11 February 2025.#W.B. Studio Sas di Wivian Bodini & C. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-608/24 P.cjeu_case · 11 февраля 2025 г.
7817Order of the Court of 11 February 2025.#W.B. Studio Sas di Wivian Bodini & C. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-607/24 P.cjeu_case · 11 февраля 2025 г.
7818Order of the Court of 11 February 2025.#W.B. Studio Sas di Wivian Bodini & C. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-607/24 P.cjeu_case · 11 февраля 2025 г.
7819Case C-747/24, Drocha: Order of the President of the Court of 11 February 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie – Poland) – Bank Millennium S.A. v PAcjeu_case · 11 февраля 2025 г.
7820CaseC-463/24: Order of the President of the Court of 11 February 2025 – Commission v Italian Republiccjeu_case · 11 февраля 2025 г.