7761Case T-134/25, D: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla miasta stołecznego Warszawy w Warszawie (Poland) made on 12 February 2025 – D v Pcjeu_case · 12 февраля 2025 г.
7762Case T-111/25: Action brought on 12 February 2025 – Sergiyenko v Councilcjeu_case · 12 февраля 2025 г.
7763Case T-106/25: Action brought on 12 February 2025 – Pols Erm v EUIPO – Holder (Pol’s FREEZE FRESH)cjeu_case · 12 февраля 2025 г.
7764Case T-105/25: Action brought on 12 February 2025 – Kutxabank v EUIPO – Klarna Bank (K.)cjeu_case · 12 февраля 2025 г.
7765Case T-104/25: Action brought on 12 February 2025 – Lami Packaging v EUIPO – Tetra Laval Holdings & Finance (Shape of octagonal packing)cjeu_case · 12 февраля 2025 г.
7766Case T-103/25: Action brought on 12 February 2025 – Luise v European Public Prosecutor’s Officecjeu_case · 12 февраля 2025 г.
7767Case T-102/25: Action brought on 12 February 2025 – Sico v European Public Prosecutor’s Officecjeu_case · 12 февраля 2025 г.
7768Case T-100/25: Action brought on 12 February 2025 – Testa v European Public Prosecutor’s Officecjeu_case · 12 февраля 2025 г.
7769Case C-135/25 PPU, Kachev: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven kasatsionen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 12 February 2025 – Criminal proceedings against М.S.Т.cjeu_case · 12 февраля 2025 г.
7770Order of the President of the General Court of 12 February 2025.#Cluster Calzado Innovación v European Commission.#Interim measures – Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) – Grant agreement – Sohealthy project – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – Lack of any urgency.#Case T-501/24 R.cjeu_case · 12 февраля 2025 г.
7771Order of the President of the General Court of 12 February 2025.#Cluster Calzado Innovación v European Commission.#Interim measures – Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) – Grant agreement – Sohealthy project – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – Lack of any urgency.#Case T-501/24 R.cjeu_case · 12 февраля 2025 г.
7772Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 February 2025.#Adina Alberts v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a cardboard box (packaging) – Earlier national word marks – Ground for invalidity – Use in the subsequent design of a distinctive sign the holder of which has the right to prohibit such use – Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Article 27(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – No similarity between the goods.#Case T-245/24.cjeu_case · 12 февраля 2025 г.
7773Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 February 2025.#Adina Alberts v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a cardboard box (packaging) – Earlier national word marks – Ground for invalidity – Use in the subsequent design of a distinctive sign the holder of which has the right to prohibit such use – Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Article 27(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – No similarity between the goods.#Case T-245/24.cjeu_case · 12 февраля 2025 г.
7774Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 February 2025.#Biif Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark CAPRIZZA – Earlier EU figurative mark capizzi GASTROPIZZA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the services – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-187/24.cjeu_case · 12 февраля 2025 г.
7775Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 February 2025.#Biif Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark CAPRIZZA – Earlier EU figurative mark capizzi GASTROPIZZA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the services – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-187/24.cjeu_case · 12 февраля 2025 г.
7776Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 February 2025.#DH v European Commission.#Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Social security – Article 101(3) of the CEOS – Total and permanent invalidity – Refusal to recognise the invalidity as arising from an occupational disease – Obligation to state reasons – Medical assessments.#Case T-171/24.cjeu_case · 12 февраля 2025 г.
7777Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 February 2025.#DH v European Commission.#Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Social security – Article 101(3) of the CEOS – Total and permanent invalidity – Refusal to recognise the invalidity as arising from an occupational disease – Obligation to state reasons – Medical assessments.#Case T-171/24.cjeu_case · 12 февраля 2025 г.
7778Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 February 2025 (Extracts).#UL and Others v European External Action Service.#Civil service – EEAS staff – Remuneration – Family allowances – Education allowance – Article 15 of Annex X to the Staff Regulations – Application for reimbursement of nursery and school fees – Decision to refuse.#Case T-17/24.cjeu_case · 12 февраля 2025 г.
7779Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 February 2025 (Extracts).#UL and Others v European External Action Service.#Civil service – EEAS staff – Remuneration – Family allowances – Education allowance – Article 15 of Annex X to the Staff Regulations – Application for reimbursement of nursery and school fees – Decision to refuse.#Case T-17/24.cjeu_case · 12 февраля 2025 г.
7780Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 February 2025.#TU and BY v European Parliament.#Civil service – Accredited parliamentary assistants – Psychological harassment – Administrative inquiry – Request for access to the inquiry report – Refusal of the request – Obligation to state reasons – Scope of the duty to provide assistance – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Principle of good administration – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Liability.#Case T-10/24.cjeu_case · 12 февраля 2025 г.