7541Case C-517/23, Apothekerkammer Nordrhein: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 February 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof – Germany) – Apothekerkammer Nordrhein v DocMorris NV (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medicinal products for human use – Directive 2001/83/EC – Article 86(1) – Concept of advertising of medicinal products – Article 87(3) – Advertising of prescription-only medicinal products – Advertising of a pharmacy’s entire range of medicinal products – Vouchers corresponding to a certain sum of money or a percentage reduction for the subsequent purchase of other products – Price reductions and payments with immediate effect – Free movement of goods – Article 34 TFEU – Freedom to provide services – Electronic commerce – Directive 2000/31/EC – Article 3(2) and (4)(a) – Restriction – Justification – Consumer protection)cjeu_case · 27 февраля 2025 г.
7542Case C-454/23, K.A.M.: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 February 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Dioikitiko Dikastirio Diethnous Prostasias – Cyprus) – Κ.Α.Μ. v Republic of Cyprus (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – International protection – Directive 2011/95/EU – Refugee status – Article 14(4)(a) and (5) – Revocation or refusal to grant refugee status in the event of danger to the security of the host Member State – Conduct and acts prior to the entry of the applicant into the territory of the host Member State – Admissibility – Validity – Article 18 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 78(1) TFEU – Convention relating to the Status of Refugees (Geneva Convention))cjeu_case · 27 февраля 2025 г.
7543Case C-353/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 27 February 2025 – Nouryon Performance Formulations BV, formerly Nouryon Industrial Chemicals BV v European Commission and Others (Appeal – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) – Evaluation of registration dossiers – Request for further studies for the purposes of the evaluation of the registration dossier for dimethyl ether – Decision addressed to the registrant and contested by it before the General Court of the European Union – Subsequent replacement of the registrant at the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) – Appeal brought by the new registrant – Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Appeal brought by an entity which was not a party to the proceedings before the General Court – Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 27 февраля 2025 г.
7544Case C-18/23, Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej (Management form of a UCI): Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 February 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Gliwicach – Poland) – F S.A. v Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 63(1) TFEU – Free movement of capital – Undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities – Corporation tax – Exemption from corporation tax for income received by such an undertaking – Conditions for exemption – External management of that undertaking – Directive 2009/65/EC – Article 29(1) – Applicability)cjeu_case · 27 февраля 2025 г.
7545Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 February 2025.#CK v Dun & Bradstreet Austria GmbH and Magistrat der Stadt Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 15(1)(h) – Automated decision-making, including profiling – Scoring – Assessment of the creditworthiness of a natural person – Access to meaningful information about the logic involved in profiling – Verification of the accuracy of the information provided – Directive (EU) 2016/943 – Point 1 of Article 2 – Trade secret – Personal data of third parties.#Case C-203/22.cjeu_case · 27 февраля 2025 г.
7546Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 February 2025.#CK v Magistrat der Stadt Wien.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 15(1)(h) – Automated decision-making, including profiling – Scoring – Assessment of the creditworthiness of a natural person – Access to meaningful information about the logic involved in profiling – Verification of the accuracy of the information provided – Directive (EU) 2016/943 – Point 1 of Article 2 – Trade secret – Personal data of third parties.#Case C-203/22.cjeu_case · 27 февраля 2025 г.
7547Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 27 February 2025.###cjeu_case · 27 февраля 2025 г.
7548Case C-203/22, Dun & Bradstreet Austria: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 February 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wien – Austria) – CK v Magistrat der Stadt Wien (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 15(1)(h) – Automated decision-making, including profiling – Scoring – Assessment of the creditworthiness of a natural person – Access to meaningful information about the logic involved in profiling – Verification of the accuracy of the information provided – Directive (EU) 2016/943 – Point 1 of Article 2 – Trade secret – Personal data of third parties)cjeu_case · 27 февраля 2025 г.
7549Case T-139/25: Action brought on 26 February 2025 – Qisda Optronics (Suzhou) v Councilcjeu_case · 26 февраля 2025 г.
7550Case T-138/25: Action brought on 26 February 2025 – Hungary v Commissioncjeu_case · 26 февраля 2025 г.
7551Case C-169/25 P: Appeal brought on 26 February 2025 by PV against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 19 June 2024 in Case T-89/20, PV v Commissioncjeu_case · 26 февраля 2025 г.
7552Case C-159/25, Rowicz: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 26 February 2025 – B.Ż, V. sp. z o.o. v T. SA, Ł.W.cjeu_case · 26 февраля 2025 г.
7553Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 26 February 2025.#Maya Tokareva v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintaining the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘benefitting from a leading businessperson operating in Russia’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Error of assessment – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-269/24.cjeu_case · 26 февраля 2025 г.
7554Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 26 February 2025.#Maya Tokareva v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintaining the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘benefitting from a leading businessperson operating in Russia’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Error of assessment – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-269/24.cjeu_case · 26 февраля 2025 г.
7555Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 February 2025.#eBilet Polska sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark eBilet – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive nature – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-197/24.cjeu_case · 26 февраля 2025 г.
7556Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 February 2025.#eBilet Polska sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark eBilet – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive nature – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-197/24.cjeu_case · 26 февраля 2025 г.
7557Arrêt du Tribunal (deuxième chambre) du 26 février 2025.#Instituto dos Vinhos do Douro e do Porto, IP (IVDP) contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure d’opposition – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne verbale PORTSOY – AOP antérieure “Port” – Article 8, paragraphe 6, du règlement (UE) 2017/1001 – Article 103, paragraphe 2, sous a), i) et ii), et sous b), du règlement (UE) no 1308/2013 – Notions d’“utilisation” et d’“évocation” d’une AOP.#Affaire T-40/24.cjeu_case · 26 февраля 2025 г.
7558Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 26 February 2025.#Instituto dos Vinhos do Douro e do Porto, IP (IVDP) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark PORTSOY – Earlier PDO ‘Port’ – Article 8(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 103(2)(a)(i) and (ii) and (b) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Concepts of ‘use’ and ‘evocation’ of a PDO.#Case T-40/24.cjeu_case · 26 февраля 2025 г.
7559Arrêt du Tribunal (deuxième chambre) du 26 février 2025.#Instituto dos Vinhos do Douro e do Porto, IP (IVDP) contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure d’opposition – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne verbale Quevedo Port – AOP antérieure “Porto/Port” – Motif relatif de refus – Article 8, paragraphe 6, du règlement (UE) 2017/1001 – Article 103, paragraphe 2, sous a), ii), et sous b), du règlement (UE) no 1308/2013 – Notions d’“utilisation” et d’“évocation” d’une AOP.#Affaire T-23/24.cjeu_case · 26 февраля 2025 г.
7560Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 26 February 2025.#Instituto dos Vinhos do Douro e do Porto, IP (IVDP) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Quevedo Port – Earlier PDO ‘Porto/Port’ – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 103(2)(a)(ii) and (b) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Concepts of ‘use’ and ‘evocation’ of a PDO.#Case T-23/24.cjeu_case · 26 февраля 2025 г.