Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
7441

Case T-90/24: Judgment of the General Court of 5 March 2025 – Kapitan Navi Elżbieta Stramek i Waldemar Karpiński v EUIPO – Homann Feinkost (Matjeshappen nach Kolberger Art) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Matjeshappen nach Kolberger Art – Absolute grounds for invalidity – No distinctive character – Descriptive character – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
7442

Case T-89/24: Judgment of the General Court of 5 March 2025 – Kapitan Navi Elżbieta Stramek i Waldemar Karpiński v EUIPO – Homann Feinkost (Matjesfilethappen nach Kolberger Art) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Matjesfilethappen nach Kolberger Art – Absolute grounds for invalidity – No distinctive character – Descriptive character – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
7447

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 March 2025.#Enedo Oyj v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Enedo RESHAPING ELECTRICITY – Earlier EU word mark ENEDIS – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Restriction of the goods and services covered in the trade mark application.#Case T-1144/23.

cjeu_case ·
7448

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 March 2025.#Enedo Oyj v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Enedo RESHAPING ELECTRICITY – Earlier EU word mark ENEDIS – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Restriction of the goods and services covered in the trade mark application.#Case T-1144/23.

cjeu_case ·
7454

Case T-1144/23: Judgment of the General Court of 5 March 2025 – Enedo v EUIPO – Enedis (Enedo RESHAPING ELECTRICITY) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Enedo RESHAPING ELECTRICITY – Earlier EU word mark ENEDIS – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Restriction of the goods and services covered in the trade mark application)

cjeu_case ·
7457

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 5 March 2025.#Alexander Ponomarenko v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or subject to restrictions on admission to the territories of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘supporting, materially or financially Russian decision-makers’ – Article 2(1)(d) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Concept of ‘association’ – Article 2(1), in fine, of Decision 2014/145 – Right to a fair trial – Right to effective judicial protection – Rights of the defence – Duty to state reasons – Proportionality – Right to property – Equal treatment.#Case T-249/22.

cjeu_case ·
7458

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 5 March 2025.#Alexander Ponomarenko v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or subject to restrictions on admission to the territories of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘supporting, materially or financially Russian decision-makers’ – Article 2(1)(d) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Concept of ‘association’ – Article 2(1), in fine, of Decision 2014/145 – Right to a fair trial – Right to effective judicial protection – Rights of the defence – Duty to state reasons – Proportionality – Right to property – Equal treatment.#Case T-249/22.

cjeu_case ·
7459

Case T-249/22: Judgment of the General Court of 5 March 2025 – Ponomarenko v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or subject to restrictions on admission to the territories of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of supporting, materially or financially Russian decision-makers – Article 2(1)(d) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Concept of association – Article 2(1), in fine, of Decision 2014/145 – Right to a fair trial – Right to effective judicial protection – Rights of the defence – Duty to state reasons – Proportionality – Right to property – Equal treatment)

cjeu_case ·