7221Case C-137/23, Alsen: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 March 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden – the Netherlands) – X v Staatssecretaris van Finaciën (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Excise duties – Directive 2003/96/EC – Taxation of energy products and electricity – Exemption of energy products used as fuel – Article 14(1)(c) – Navigation within EU waters – Article 15(1)(f) – Navigation on inland waterways – Directive 95/60/EC – Fiscal marking of gas oils and kerosene – Gas oil, to which fiscal marking has not been applied in accordance with EU law, intended for use for the propulsion of a vessel – Refusal to apply the exemption from payment of excise duty – Principle of proportionality)cjeu_case · 13 марта 2025 г.
7222Case C-72/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 March 2025 – Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) v Council of the European Union (Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Combating terrorism – Restrictive measures taken against certain persons and entities – Freezing of funds – Common Position 2001/931/CFSP – Article 1(3), (4) and (6) – Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 – Article 2(3) – Maintenance of an organisation on the list of persons, groups and entities involved in terrorist acts – Applicability to situations of armed conflict – Terrorist group – Nature of, and underlying reasons for, the acts carried out – Distance in time – Ongoing risk of involvement in terrorist activities – Proportionality – Obligation to state reasons)cjeu_case · 13 марта 2025 г.
7223Case C-44/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 March 2025 – Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) v Council of the European Union (Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Combating terrorism – Restrictive measures taken against certain persons and entities – Freezing of funds – Common Position 2001/931/CFSP – Article 1(3), (4) and (6) – Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 – Article 2(3) – Maintenance of an organisation on the list of persons, groups and entities involved in terrorist acts – Applicability to situations of armed conflict – Terrorist group – Nature of, and underlying reasons for, the acts carried out – Distance in time – Ongoing risk of involvement in terrorist activities – Proportionality – Obligation to state reasons)cjeu_case · 13 марта 2025 г.
7224Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 March 2025.#CRRC Qingdao Sifang Co. Ltd and Astra Vagoane Călători SA v Autoritatea pentru Reformă Feroviară and Alstom Ferroviaria SpA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement in the European Union – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 25 – Economic operators of a third country which has not concluded an international agreement with the European Union which guarantees access to public procurement in a reciprocal and equal manner – No right for those economic operators to ‘no less favourable treatment’ – Exclusion of such an economic operator from a public procurement procedure, pursuant to national legislation – Exclusive competence of the Union.#Case C-266/22.cjeu_case · 13 марта 2025 г.
7225Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 March 2025.#CRRC Qingdao Sifang Co. Ltd and Astra Vagoane Călători SA v Autoritatea pentru Reformă Feroviară and Alstom Ferroviaria SpA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement in the European Union – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 25 – Economic operators of a third country which has not concluded an international agreement with the European Union which guarantees access to public procurement in a reciprocal and equal manner – No right for those economic operators to ‘no less favourable treatment’ – Exclusion of such an economic operator from a public procurement procedure, pursuant to national legislation – Exclusive competence of the Union.#Case C-266/22.cjeu_case · 13 марта 2025 г.
7226Case C-266/22, CRRC Qingdao Sifang and Others: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 March 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel București – Romania) – CRRC Qingdao Sifang Co. Ltd, Astra Vagoane Călători SA v Autoritatea pentru Reformă Feroviară, Alstom Ferroviaria SpA (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement in the European Union – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 25 – Economic operators of a third country which has not concluded an international agreement with the European Union which guarantees access to public procurement in a reciprocal and equal manner – No right for those economic operators to no less favourable treatment – Exclusion of such an economic operator from a public procurement procedure, pursuant to national legislation – Exclusive competence of the European Union)cjeu_case · 13 марта 2025 г.
7227Case C-202/25, Tadmur: Request for a preliminary ruling from the rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Roermond (Netherlands) lodged on 12 March 2025 – HG v Minister van Asiel en Migratiecjeu_case · 12 марта 2025 г.
7228Case C-201/25, Ayuntamiento de Murcia: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social n.o 3 de Murcia (Spain) lodged on 12 March 2025 – AOL and PSM v Ayuntamiento de Murciacjeu_case · 12 марта 2025 г.
7229Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 12 March 2025.#Shorts International Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark SHORTS – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-307/24.cjeu_case · 12 марта 2025 г.
7230Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 12 March 2025.#Shorts International Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark SHORTS – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-307/24.cjeu_case · 12 марта 2025 г.
7231Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 12 March 2025.#Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark LavalleGlass – Earlier EU figurative mark LAV – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No likelihood of confusion.#Case T-293/24.cjeu_case · 12 марта 2025 г.
7232Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 12 March 2025.#Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark LavalleGlass – Earlier EU figurative mark LAV – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No likelihood of confusion.#Case T-293/24.cjeu_case · 12 марта 2025 г.
7233Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 12 March 2025.#Lidl Vertriebs GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a LED light bulb – Disclosure of the earlier design not taken into account – Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Requirements – Burden of proof.#Case T-66/24.cjeu_case · 12 марта 2025 г.
7234Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 12 March 2025.#Lidl Vertriebs GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a LED light bulb – Disclosure of the earlier design not taken into account – Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Requirements – Burden of proof.#Case T-66/24.cjeu_case · 12 марта 2025 г.
7235Case T-307/24: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2025 – Shorts International v EUIPO (SHORTS) (EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark SHORTS – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 12 марта 2025 г.
7236Case T-293/24: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2025 – Gürok v EUIPO – Lavalle Martínez (LavalleGlass) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark LavalleGlass – Earlier EU figurative mark LAV – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No likelihood of confusion)cjeu_case · 12 марта 2025 г.
7237Case T-66/24: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2025 – Lidl v EUIPO – Liquidleds Lighting (LED light bulbs) (Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a LED light bulb – Disclosure of the earlier design not taken into account – Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Requirements – Burden of proof)cjeu_case · 12 марта 2025 г.
7238Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 March 2025.#Coopservice soc. coop. p.a v Consip SpA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Public procurement – Exclusion of a tenderer from the award procedure – Enforcement of the provisional security – Automatic application of that penalty – Tenderer having already been awarded a lot of the same call for tenders – Principle of proportionality – Requirement to present the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-285/24.cjeu_case · 12 марта 2025 г.
7239Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 March 2025.#Coopservice soc. coop. p.a v Consip SpA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Public procurement – Exclusion of a tenderer from the award procedure – Enforcement of the provisional security – Automatic application of that penalty – Tenderer having already been awarded a lot of the same call for tenders – Principle of proportionality – Requirement to present the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-285/24.cjeu_case · 12 марта 2025 г.
7240Case C-285/24, Coopservice: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 March 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato – Italy) – Coopservice soc. coop. p.a, acting on its own behalf and as agent of GME constituted with the principals Natuna Srl and XC Srl v Consip SpA (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Public procurement – Exclusion of a tenderer from the award procedure – Enforcement of the provisional security – Automatic application of that penalty – Tenderer having already been awarded a lot of the same call for tenders – Principle of proportionality – Requirement to present the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling – Manifest inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 12 марта 2025 г.