Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
7131

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 19 March 2025.#Asaş Alüminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark ASAŞ – Earlier national figurative mark ASSA Asfaltos del Sureste, S.A. – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-172/24.

cjeu_case ·
7132

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 19 March 2025.#Asaş Alüminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark ASAŞ – Earlier national figurative mark ASSA Asfaltos del Sureste, S.A. – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-172/24.

cjeu_case ·
7135

Case T-172/24: Judgment of the General Court of 19 March 2025 – Asaş Alüminyum v EUIPO – Asfaltos del Sureste (ASAŞ) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark ASAŞ – Earlier national figurative mark ASSA Asfaltos del Sureste, S.A. – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
7136

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 19 March 2025.#e-dialog GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark Dialoga – Genuine use of the mark – Point (a) of the second subparagraph of Article 18(1) and Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Determination of independent subcategories of services – Proof of genuine use – Assessment of evidence.#Case T-1075/23.

cjeu_case ·
7137

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 19 March 2025.#e-dialog GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark Dialoga – Genuine use of the mark – Point (a) of the second subparagraph of Article 18(1) and Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Determination of independent subcategories of services – Proof of genuine use – Assessment of evidence.#Case T-1075/23.

cjeu_case ·
7138

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 March 2025.#AAT Byelorussian Steel Works - management company of "Byelorussian Metallurgical Company" holding (BSW - management company of "BMC" holding) v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list – Support for the Lukashenko regime – Benefit derived from the Lukashenko regime – Undertaking belonging to the State – Error of assessment – Right to property – Freedom to conduct a business.#Case T-1042/23.

cjeu_case ·
7139

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 March 2025.#AAT Byelorussian Steel Works - management company of "Byelorussian Metallurgical Company" holding (BSW - management company of "BMC" holding) v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list – Support for the Lukashenko regime – Benefit derived from the Lukashenko regime – Undertaking belonging to the State – Error of assessment – Right to property – Freedom to conduct a business.#Case T-1042/23.

cjeu_case ·